Why are so many willing to let the NHS go under?
I have found a lot of bad assumptions at the heart of those who want to see the NHS fail and a new system take its place. A few tweets to add to the debate.. #YourNHSNeedsYou #SaveOurNHS @NHSMillion @EveryDoctorUK
Some argue that no health system has copied the NHS.
The reality is that most high-income countries have copied the NHS-model and have a very similar model. Few have however, managed to make healthcare provision the sole duty of the state...
Although in 2012, I believe this current government pushed through an amendment to make it NOT the responsibility of the Health Sec. @JolyonMaugham @ChrisCEOHopson
The core 'value' or feature of the NHS is that there is a national health system, NOT a series of completely separate and distinct hospital groups. I can refer to the national hospital for cardiology or neurology. I can and have spoken to the national expert about a patient...
In a US-model, each group tries to be as self-contained as possible. Provide the service to keep the income, of course. It is bad medicine. We do want actual experts; we want to be able to transfer patients to the place that best serves their needs. We want evidenced protocols
While there may be a mixed modelling for payment and even provision of health services in many countries, the core feature is that of the NHS: the national health service is the most dominant and where the expertise can be reliably found.
There should be debate going forward as to what model is best...BUT as it stands now, the way the NHS is being sold off - stealthily and in chunks -, there is a more US-style forming - disparate, with much worse outcomes.
Whatever model exists, the user always pays. In the US they pay twice as much for worse outcomes - cancer, heart, stroke, child mortality, maternal mortality, ...
Indeed, there are other models that have better outcomes for around the same public spend as the UK...
But without the choice...where the greedy, corrupt minority simply gouge themselves on whatever chunks of the NHS this Leadership can covertly break-off, then we simply form the entire system on profit and greed and to benefit a very small minority.
We need the open debate. And please bear in mind, we may chose to fund our health service differently, but we the people should not and need not lose access to all services and all treatment options currently available.
Lets have the debate. Let us all look at the facts and the different models. Sleep-walking into such a major decision without a clear plan, rarely ends well. But, be clear, it is up to the public to demand the open debate...I just work here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More people will die this week from COVID-19 than died of FLU in the whole of 2019.
And just to be clear: if you are in hospital you will be tested for the flu. And excess deaths last week = 1400. That is, 1400 people are no longer here that would be here if we stopped behaving like spoiled children - gov and others included. Norway excess death = -6.
Ok. Just to be very very clear!!!
FLU and COVID are like Ghandi and Boris Johnson….yes, both human but one causes much more damage and destruction.
Thread explaining the ACTUAL facts!!!! Happy to answer any reasonable question
As panic gripped a rudderless nation, worst-case scenarios were being projected and simulations cast doom over the healthcare service’s ability to cope, the relative unknown fatality of this new infection foraging the globe loomed over our heads.
It was March 2020, and within this culture of fear, speculation became an acceptable basis for decision-making. Fear of needing to ration became rationing itself; protecting the NHS became failing to protect the people, and government policy suddenly became 'clinical guidelines’
My Pinned Tweet
I believe we should mitigate against Covid-19 - masks, vaccines, ventilation/filtration, etc.. - and increase BASIC healthcare capacity. This will help prevent death, disability, social restrictions, economy, and the secondary impact on non-Covid diseases.
Mortality is high in the UK.
1 in 400 of all UK citizens have died from Covid.
Most didn't need to.
Enough mitigation strategies to permit access to enough healthcare will allow life to function closer to normal with the least amount of suffering.
This paper was developed from a collaboration between primary, secondary, and public health care specialists. Its aim was to examine and highlight the policies that have led to restricted access to healthcare in the UK.
2/18
It shows: 1. No triage for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases
Despite WHO recommendation to triage all patients with this novel coronavirus, patients are told to NOT contact their GP and instead use an AUTOMATED, online patient-led triage system,... BUT only if concerned...
The public have a right to feel ABANDONED...
...in many ways they were.
But give me a moment to convince you: it was NOT the NHS that abandoned the public...it was our Leadership who abandoned us all.
[RT pls - people need to know].
1/10
2/10
All but the most suggestible would agree: the UK have sh*t the bed with COVID-19. A series of colossal and deadly failures led to the highest mortality rate in Europe,...
3/10
..one of the worst economic declines in the world, and a devastating effect on non-COVID diseases.
At the start of the pandemic The UK Government reduced NHS bed capacity. The further into Winter we get the more catastrophic this failure/decision becomes.