On way into stocktaking plenary #COP26

First big test for the formal talks…
Reminder on things they'll be discussing:

Glasgow "cover decision"

And of course the rest of the negotiations, including Article 6 cooperation including carbon markets

#COP26 president Sharma opening the plenary by expressing his thanks and asking for applause

1. update from SBI/SBSTA chairs
2. UK lead negotiator Archie Young
3. Sharma on week 2
Tosi Mpanu Mpanu SBSTA chair

talks covered 19 items

listing various things concluded on Saturday including stocktake, periodic review etc etc

Some outstanding issues require further tech work & political guidance inc Article 6

"determination to find solutions and compromises"
SBSTA chair continues on Article 6

"limited number of remaining difficult issues"
"mood and tone in the room has been very constructive"
SBSTA chair on transparency

3 main issues remain:
* application of flexibility and how reelected
* structured summary format
* programme of support for developing

many d'ping indicated no deal without support
SBSTA chair on adaptation c'tee

"parties made good progress but could not resolve all issues"

(similar on "response measures")
Marianne Karlsen, SBI chair

"parties worked until compromises could be found"
thanks delegates for their "relentless work"

on ACE, recommended 10yr work prog
on gender, took stock of progress

"work advanced well" on Koronivia joint work on agriculture
SBI chair

2nd periodic review, parties noted 3rd meeting of "structured expert dialogue" next year

a few issues brought fwd to this week:

"common timeframes" – 9 options remain, which parties have been working on since 2017

"it is now time to consolidate these options"
SBI chair

believe parties are now ready to find a solution on common timeframes

parties did not agree on membership of Adaptation Committee

on "response measures", parties were "quite close to a resolution" but ran out of time "would benefit from a few more hours together
SBI chair

"I am confident that you will find a way forward"

thanks presidency, SBSTA chair etc etc
UK chief negotiator Archie Young for presidency

"good progress" on finance last week
look fwd to work continuing today/tomorrow

"very good progress" on technology / CTCN
Archie Young

"we have a lot of work to do across all issues that remain and we will need to work at pace"

"presidency has been working with secretariat to facilitate late night working this week…"
Sharma

must now shift gear to finish on Friday [no-one believes we will finish then]

3 tracks
* continued technical negs
* presidency consultations inc "cover decision"
* ministerial consultations on key outstanding political issues
Sharma

"it is my expectation that the majority of technical work will be concluded by Wednesday"

some issues where no agreement:
* transparency of action and support: asked cofacs to continue to lead discussions
* Article 6: asked SBSTA chair to lead discussions on tech issues
Sharma

* adaptation: asked SBI chair to lead discussions on outstanding tech issues inc adaptation committee reports + global goal on adaptation

calls for this to conclude by Tuesday PM
Sharma

* on WIM, parties need more time on functions of Santiago network: asked cofacs to continue to lead and report back Tuesday morning
* adaptation committee: will ask senior member of UK delegation to lead on this
* response measures: will confirm who to lead ASAP
Sharma

* HOD meeting today on "cover decision", informed by his "non-paper" published yday

Pairs of ministers to lead key challenges, in keeping with UNFCCC tradition. Aimed to keep balance of countries, gender
A6: Norway/Singapore on SoP, double counting outside NDCs and Kyoto carryover

Timeframes: missed but focus will be if there should be a single timeframe or not (!)

Transparency: NZ/Antigua+Barbuda
Mitigation: Grenada/Denmark to lead, with particular focus on tangible actions required from parties this decade and beyond to keep 1.5C in reach

Loss & damage: good progress but some feel importance transcends tech discussions so Lux/Jamaica to lead consultations
Finance: large number of outstanding issues so Egypt / Sweden to lead. Beginning with ministerial this afternoon and informal dialogue.

costa rica to support ministers and Sharma to coordinate negotiations across all items

ministers have authority to issue texts
Sharma

"My hope and expectation is that most first texts will emerge this evening"

regular stocktaking meetings to update parties
status updates to be published

"the presidency's door and indeed my door in particular remains open"
keeps reiterating Friday close of #COP26

"I expect only very few issues to remain open on Wednesday"

priority for Thu to resolve outstanding issues
requests parties to refrain from general remarks
Guinea for G77+China

"during the past week we have tried to move our work fwd under severe constraints on access due to Covid"

many continued challenges

"on finance, a COP w/out a concrete outcome on finance can never be successful"
Guinea

disappointed that developed countries unwilling to discuss progress on 100bn

"in reality, it is an empty commitment"
Guinea

transparency: wish to see an outcome where requirements are matched with adequate support; also wants linkage with Article 6
Guinea

stocktake: appreciate willingness and flex shown by all parties; looking fwd to stocktake so we have better understanding on how we got here, where we are and where we want to go to meet goals of Convention
Guinea

Loss and damage: more work needs to be done on function of Santiago network; on finance, needs must be fairly reflected; concerned developed countries attempting to narrow scope
Antigua & Barbuda for AOSIS

flurry of pledges and announcements last week
welcomes but b4 we congratulate ourselves, let's make sure they're in line with 1.5C
cites UNFCCC synthesis report showing "huge ambition gap"
A&B

"failure to deliver 100bn is a missing rung in the PA ratchet up mechanism"
calls for adaptaion finance to be doubled
recognises cover decision idea for adaptation finance to be in balance with mitigation
need new and additional loss and damage finance
A&B

need loss and damage in new post-2025 finance goal
raises "trillions of dollars" in fossil fuel subsidies
"G20 members agreed in 2009 to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies"
must reflect this in UNFCCC progress
A&B

"let us stop paying lip service on access to finance"
"I voice my group's concern that no less than 4 negotiation sessions started without AOSIS in the room"
Bhutan for LDCs

concern over disconnect between ambition of public statements and what is happening in negotiations

emissions still expected to increase to 2030, rather than 45% reduction needed for 1.5C
Bhutan

compromise on 1.5C means compromising the lives of billions
call for enhanced NDCs by next year – must see that in cover decision
100bn needs to be fulfilled; post-2025 finance goal must include loss and damage
Bhutan

Article 6: concerned still hearing opposition to Share of Proceeds for Adaptation Fund

Transparency: flexibility remains key for LDCs but should not be used by others to justify inaction
Bhutan

Common timeframes: disappointing progress; unable to streamline after four years; extremely difficult to resolve this week
Peru for AILAC

encourages presidency to be bold and aim for a meaningful outcome
balanced outcome at COP must include progress on all issues including adaptation – global goal on A
need to close 2030 ambition gap for 1.5C
[Sharma asking parties to be brief]

Gabon for AGN

expect developed countries with higher emissions to provide ambitious NDCs
request synthesis report to provide for differentiated peaking under Article 4 of Paris
"unfortunate" re pre-2020 gap, which should be closed
Gabon

"Adaptation is a core and fundamental element of the Paris Agreement"
raises importance global goal on adaptation
"key priority of AGN is finance" - wants agreement on long-term finance
Gabon

concerned that annex I parties haven't met legally binding obligations
on post-2025 finance goal needs to take into account needs of developing countries
calls for minimum $1.3tn per year by 2030 on grant basis with balance btwn adaptation/mitigation
Switzerland for EIG

important to ensure inclusive and transparent process
eager to conclude successful COP on Friday
wants "ambitious and tangible outcomes"
Switzerland

Article 6: an agreement will only be a success if our rules send a clear signal that double counting and double claiming must be avoided at all times

this will be a criteria of success for Article 6
Switzerland

retains position from Katowice: all parties must report all reporting tables; support will be critical

finance: post-2025 finance talks key goal of COP26

urge to strive for highest common denominator
Bolivia for LMDC

all we hear in negotiating rooms, corridors etc is ambition, ambition, ambition

but does not seem to be any appetite from partners to unleash ambition on decisions at COP26

* partners don't want to define finance
* don't want discussion of pre-2020
etc
Bolivia

"if we don't learn from history, we are bound to repeat mistakes"

"there is a history of broken promises and unfulfilled commitments from developed countries"

cannot ignore the past
Bolivia

"principles of equity and CBDR are non-negotiable for us"

must stick to mandates; urge developed country parties not to be a roadblock
Bolivia

technical negs should be allowed to continue b4 issues sent to ministers…

cannot afford to risk health of negotiators by making them work late at night…
Saudi Arabia for Arab Group

not all parties negotiating in good faith in wk1 "we know who they are"

calls for "party driven" process [code for opposition to presidency-led consultations?]
India for BASIC

"access to the venue remains challenging"

congrats on "very successful world leaders summit"

doesn't want enhanced ambition to meet same fate as pre-2020 finance target (100bn)

require "significantly enhanced climate finance"
India

calls for structured process towards post-2025 finance target; lack of serious approach to this will jeopardise enhanced ambition

wants mandate for Standing Committee on Finance to continue work

finance responsibility remains for developed countries
India

Article 6: wants to see deal on transition of Kyoto credits, share of proceeds for adaptation

Transparency: d'ping need adequate financial support; ETF talks cannot be successful w/out this support

**against more frequent NDC ratchet
PNG

need to think landing zones…

finance has to be sustainable and drives ambition for d'ping countries; need to leave with global stocktake focus on emissions AND finance; need roadmap for NDCs and finance to reach goal
PNG

Article 6 "reckless" to rely on Share of Proceeds for adaptation finance

pre-2020 best financed outside of Article 6 [ref to CDM carryover?]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Evans

Simon Evans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrSimEvans

5 Nov
Long train journey so some reflections on current draft #COP26 texts

Are they close to a deal?

TL;DR very very long way to go in key areas including transparency, Article 6, common timeframes etc
In Article 6, latest texts include multiple refs to human rights, recalling the Paris text

(but NB non binding "should"…)
(See our Article 6 primer for background

carbonbrief.org/in-depth-q-and… )
Read 12 tweets
5 Nov
NEW

Overnight at #COP26 we've had new texts on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, covering cooperation including carbon markets

At first glance they've made slow progress, only getting down to 296 [bracketed / disputed] bits of text vs 378 at the start of the week
The texts are a little tidier and easier to read, but eg here on the transition of Kyoto credits into Article 6 there are additional options

L: 2 Nov
R: 5 Nov

(5 Nov expclicitly includes "CERs shall not be used")
Here are the texts

Article 6.2 unfccc.int/sites/default/…
Article 6.4 unfccc.int/sites/default/…
Article 6.8 unfccc.int/sites/default/…
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
NEW

UK govt has finally published details of its heat & buildings strategy, which will be out in full tomorrow

🎯new gas boiler ban* from 2035
💷£3.9bn funding inc £450m for heat pumps
📜shift levies off electricity bills over 10yrs
🔥decision on hydrogen heat in 2026

THREAD
First, why does this matter?

The UK's way off track against its legally-binding climate goals, inc net-zero by 2050 & the interim carbon budgets for late 2020s onwards

Pink scribble = gap btwn policies vs targets

carbonbrief.org/ccc-uk-will-mi…
We can expect more on how govt expects to close gap tomorrow (?) w publication of delayed UK net-zero strategy

But heat and buildings probably the trickiest area in political terms: it's up close & personal, it could be disruptive – low-carbon heat's currently expensive
Read 21 tweets
5 Oct
Super excited to finally share this updated analysis on the countries most responsible for climate change, now including all sources of CO2:

US 509GtCO2
CN 284
RU 172
BR 113
ID 103
DE 88
IN 86
UK 74
JP 68
CA 65

1/n

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We first published analysis of cumulative historical CO2 in 2019 & I've been talking / thinking about it ever since

Our new article (by me) + animation by @tomoprater tries to answer all the questions we've had over the years – please do read

2/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We've made 4 big additions:

📅fully updated through 2021
🌲CO2 from land-use change & forestry
🚢analysis of consumption emissions
👪analysis of cumulative CO2 per capita

3/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Read 11 tweets
21 Jul
How lobbying works Pt 994

Heat & transport are the "two key sectors which appear to have the strongest potential for hydrogen"

Really?

So says Council for Science & Technology, chaired by @uksciencechief to advise UK PM

And who *really* says that?

1/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The line comes from a letter to @beisgovuk secretary of state @KwasiKwarteng, PM & other senior ministers

The letter is billed as advice on decarbonising homes & the development of a hydrogen economy

It's signed by Patrick Vallance @uksciencechief

2/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
But who actually wrote the advice?

"We would like to thank Dervilla Mitchell (Director of Arup) and Paul Stein (Chief Technology Officer, Rolls-Royce plc) for leading the briefing sessions and development of this advice."

3/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Read 11 tweets
6 Jul
Major new @OBR_UK report today on "fiscal risks" to UK has a big chapter on net-zero

OBR estimates net cost of net-zero by 2050 at £321bn

Crucially: "Unmitigated climate change would ultimately have catastrophic economic & fiscal consequences"

THREAD

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
The OBR identifies three "potentially catastrophic" sources of fiscal risk to the UK

These are the pandemic, unmitigated climate change & public sector debt

("the fiscal costs of reducing net emissions to zero…could be significant but not exceptional")

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
On net-zero, the @OBR_UK chapter is a really detailed and nuanced look at the costs, benefits and risks of (not) acting on climate change, over 69 dense pages

I'd encourage you to read it

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(