NEW

UK govt has finally published details of its heat & buildings strategy, which will be out in full tomorrow

🎯new gas boiler ban* from 2035
💷£3.9bn funding inc £450m for heat pumps
📜shift levies off electricity bills over 10yrs
🔥decision on hydrogen heat in 2026

THREAD
First, why does this matter?

The UK's way off track against its legally-binding climate goals, inc net-zero by 2050 & the interim carbon budgets for late 2020s onwards

Pink scribble = gap btwn policies vs targets

carbonbrief.org/ccc-uk-will-mi…
We can expect more on how govt expects to close gap tomorrow (?) w publication of delayed UK net-zero strategy

But heat and buildings probably the trickiest area in political terms: it's up close & personal, it could be disruptive – low-carbon heat's currently expensive
Overall, UK has made rapid recent progress thanks to nearly phasing out coal in power sector, but CO2 from homes is actually *increasing* making it the 2nd largest source of emissions after transport

Homes (largely their gas boilers) = 16% of UK GHGs
So what's in this new strategy?

🎯"Ban" on new gas boilers from 2035

Press release wording is loose, saying govt has a "confirmed ambition" that all new heating systems from 2035 will be low carbon

That's…not a ban
What does "confirmed ambition" mean?

Back in the Energy White Paper, govt said it "expected" new heating installs to be low carbon by the mid-2030s

carbonbrief.org/in-depth-qa-ho…
Being a cynic, I'd say "confirmed ambition" is constructively ambiguous enough for all in Cabinet to agree to & to spin as appropriate

So…it's a ban! But also, not a ban!

Given press around this, I'm not surprised.

(+Basically if market/public treats as ban, it's a ban.)
(The press release stresses that "no-one will be forced to remove their existing fossil fuel boilers".

Anyone using the phrase "forced to rip out their boilers" should henceforth put £1 in the naughty jar.)
On to the funding…

💷 £3.9bn is…not anywhere close, even with existing spend, to making up the £9.2bn for home energy efficiency improvements pledged in the Tory manifesto

It'd hardly be 1st pledge to be broken, but still

carbonbrief.org/election-2019-…
There's a lot of ground to make up on energy efficiency, since Cameron "cut the green crap" and ended UK progress in 2013…

Not clear this new money bridges the gap. I await the verdict of @theCCCuk and others.

On heat pumps, the govt strategy stresses they will play a "key role" in all scenarios

That shouldn't be a surprise as it's what CCC, IEA and basically all recent studies have suggested

In terms of funding, £450m over 3yrs –at £5,000 per home– is just 30,000 installations/yr, barely an increase on current rates & WAY short of govt target for 600,000/yr by 2028 (it'd pay for 5% of that)

CCC says we need 100k/yr in existing homes to 2025

theccc.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
But govt making big play on innovation, with £60m to help make heat pumps as cheap as or cheaper than gas boilers by 2030 – with cost reductions of 25-50% "expected" by 2025

*If* that happens, need for grants falls away
(Here's the latest on current heat pump costs from @JennyC_Hill at the CCC)

Another key enabling policy change in the strategy is…

📜shifting env/social levies off electricity bills, which govt says it will decide on next yr, with a view to making the move over 10yrs
Shifting levies off electricity bills would end the current perverse subsidy for fossil gas over cleaner electricity

-Gas boilers currently get a massive subsidy in CO2 terms due to not paying for their emissions

Media reports have suggested govt looking to move levies to gas. Press release silent on that.

Big political risks here & could be v regressive / increase fuel poverty w/out appropriate design

(Energy efficiency would help cut bills)

🔥 on hydrogen…despite all the media hype…

Govt leaving a decision on hydrogen heat until 2026

By then, govt saying heat pumps 50% cheaper + being installed at scale…

Draw your own conclusions 🤷‍♂️
(Don't be surprised if there is nevertheless plenty of coverage around hydrogen heat tomorrow – I've personally received a bunch of press releases touting it as a solution for low-carbon heat.)

Background in our hydrogen Q&A

carbonbrief.org/in-depth-qa-do…
We'll have all the details for you @CarbonBrief once the full strategy document gets published

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Evans

Simon Evans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrSimEvans

5 Oct
Super excited to finally share this updated analysis on the countries most responsible for climate change, now including all sources of CO2:

US 509GtCO2
CN 284
RU 172
BR 113
ID 103
DE 88
IN 86
UK 74
JP 68
CA 65

1/n

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We first published analysis of cumulative historical CO2 in 2019 & I've been talking / thinking about it ever since

Our new article (by me) + animation by @tomoprater tries to answer all the questions we've had over the years – please do read

2/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
We've made 4 big additions:

📅fully updated through 2021
🌲CO2 from land-use change & forestry
🚢analysis of consumption emissions
👪analysis of cumulative CO2 per capita

3/

carbonbrief.org/analysis-which…
Read 11 tweets
21 Jul
How lobbying works Pt 994

Heat & transport are the "two key sectors which appear to have the strongest potential for hydrogen"

Really?

So says Council for Science & Technology, chaired by @uksciencechief to advise UK PM

And who *really* says that?

1/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The line comes from a letter to @beisgovuk secretary of state @KwasiKwarteng, PM & other senior ministers

The letter is billed as advice on decarbonising homes & the development of a hydrogen economy

It's signed by Patrick Vallance @uksciencechief

2/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
But who actually wrote the advice?

"We would like to thank Dervilla Mitchell (Director of Arup) and Paul Stein (Chief Technology Officer, Rolls-Royce plc) for leading the briefing sessions and development of this advice."

3/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Read 11 tweets
6 Jul
Major new @OBR_UK report today on "fiscal risks" to UK has a big chapter on net-zero

OBR estimates net cost of net-zero by 2050 at £321bn

Crucially: "Unmitigated climate change would ultimately have catastrophic economic & fiscal consequences"

THREAD

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
The OBR identifies three "potentially catastrophic" sources of fiscal risk to the UK

These are the pandemic, unmitigated climate change & public sector debt

("the fiscal costs of reducing net emissions to zero…could be significant but not exceptional")

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
On net-zero, the @OBR_UK chapter is a really detailed and nuanced look at the costs, benefits and risks of (not) acting on climate change, over 69 dense pages

I'd encourage you to read it

obr.uk/frr/fiscal-ris…
Read 17 tweets
2 Jul
Today's Times frontpage is reporting govt plans to (consult on & then maybe) include heat & transport fuel in the UK's emissions trading scheme

A few thoughts

1/

thetimes.co.uk/article/gas-an…
We currently only pay for CO2 emissions from electricity generation & industry

This is…bonkers

Domestic gas use gets an effective *subsidy* of ~£100/tCO2

(Air travel is even worse – and look at road vs rail!)

HT @EnergySysCat, scribbles are mine

2/

es.catapult.org.uk/comment/carbon…
So as a matter of principle, it would make sense to have a CO2 price on gas and (all!) transport fuels

(Economists often bang on about harmonised economy-wide carbon pricing for optimum "efficiency")

✅Polluter pays
✅Shift fiscal incentives towards electricity

But…

3/
Read 12 tweets
24 May
In its WEO 2008 the IEA "reference scenario" suggested coal power would reach 12,000TWh by 2020

In reality, coal was 25% lower (-3,000TWh, equiv of overall EU demand)

Solar output was 8x higher than expected
Wind nearly twice as high

What else was different?

1/

HT @KetanJ0
Gas, hydro, wind and solar all significantly outperformed the IEA's reference scenario expectations from 2008, whereas nuclear and coal were lower

Demand overall was lower than expected, too

2/
There are at least two ways to read this

A) yah boo, the IEA got it wrong on renewables (again)
B) the world implemented a lot of new climate policy since 2008, beyond the static view of the 2008 "reference scenario" (pic)

…but really it's (C), a mixture of both

3/
Read 6 tweets
18 May
THREAD

So many remarkable things in today's @IEA net-zero by 2050 report. Here are a few:

⛏️ immediate end to new fossil fuel extraction
🏭 unabated fossil energy plummets

-98% coal
-91% oil
-88% gas

🌞 solar becomes largest energy source

1/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
IEA boss Fatih Birol calls the net-zero scenario "the energy future we all need to focus on"

Not hard to see why:

🌡️ avoids 1.5C
⚡️ universal energy access
😷 2m fewer premature pollution deaths
💵 increases global GDP

2/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
There's one big problem…

The world's currently on track for 2.7C (STEPS)
Even all the net-zero goals mean 2.1C (APC)

…leaving a 22GtCO2 ambition gap in 2050 to stay below 1.5C (NZE)

"[the] gap between rhetoric and action needs to close"

3/

carbonbrief.org/iea-renewables…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(