(Thread alert.) I think a lot about the rise of Nazism, in no small part because my father's Jewish family was persecuted & killed by Nazis, and because my mother's family were ethnic Germans from Ukraine, some of whom served in the Wehrmacht and the SS. This stuff is in my DNA.
So I've long been puzzled by the argument that the Nazis were good for Germany's economy. I heard it at debate tournaments when I was in high school. A generation later, when my daughter was a competitive debater, other teams were still making that tired debate point.
Of course, any defence of Nazis or Nazism is prima facia offensive and stupid. But this particular point? It's also factually incorrect. Because the Nazis destroyed Germany's economy.
It was, for example, a very bad economic plan to exile, chase away, imprison, or straight up murder Jewish scientists, artists, writers, filmmakers, inventors, entrepreneurs and investors. I mean, it was obviously hateful and genocidal. But also bad economics.
It was also - news flash - a terrible economic plan to fight and lose a two-front war, have all your factories destroyed, see your country divided in half, and leave your people to starve.
By 1946, Germany was a hollowed out wreck. My mother, by that point, was a child living in a refugee camp in the American area of occupation. So I grew up on stories of the privation suffered by German civilians, especially women, children and the elderly, in that time period.
So. Any hypothetical social studies curriculum that argued Nazis were great economic managers wouldn't just offend me, as a person of Jewish descent, as obvious Holocaust apologia. It would also offend me as a person of German descent - and a student of history.
My redoubtable Oma, a widow with three young children, fled post-war German for a new life in Canada, because of the ruin wrought by Hitler. She could not forsee the Marshall Plan or the successes of Konrad Adenauer in restoring West Germany.
So. It is long past time to put to rest the argument that the Nazis were great economic managers. It's not just a form of passive-aggressive anti-Semitism. It demeans and diminishes the Germany of today, and all those who fought for its post-war reclamation and redemption.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One week till Albertans go to the polls. A good day, perhaps, to talk about the way Senators come to be Senators in Canada. Senators are appointed, not elected. And there are important historical reasons for that. #abpoli#ableg#cdnpoli#SenCa
In the words of the Supreme Court of Canada, an appointed Senate is part of the fundamental architecture of our Constitution and our Confederation. Here's why. #SenCa#ableg#abpoli#cdnpoli
With our daughter away at university, our Thanksgiving Covid bubble is just my husband, his mum and me. I bought the tiniest turkey. It’s roasting up nicely, though it still has a ways to go.
(Normally, my husband cooks the turkey - and he’s very good at it. But today is his birthday, so he’s relaxing and I am cooking my first ever turkey. Wish me luck - as I wish all of you a happy Thanksgiving.)
A thread. My mother was a smoker. A dedicated, passionate smoker. She wasn’t just an addict. She loved the coolness of smoking. She loved cigarettes as fashion accessories. She loved the conviviality of hanging out with other smokers. And for years, she would not quit.
Nothing would convince her. Her children begged her. Her non-smoking husband cajoled her. She was not a stupid woman. She read the news. She understood the science. But she would not give up smoking. It helped to define her.
Then, her friends & family started dying - in their early 50s - of smoking related diseases. Heart attacks. Strokes. Lung cancer. Her best friend. Her favourite cousin. I thought that might change her mind. It did not.
A difficult moment in the Senate tonight. ISG Senator Mary Jane McCallum, speaking to Bill C-15, held an eagle feather. Conservative leader Don Plett rose on a point of order, asking the Speaker to decide whether the feather was allowed. Debate ensued.. @ISGSenate#SenCa
The Speaker was compelled to break for dinner moment later, at 6 pm EDT. Debate over whether an Indigenous Senator can hold an eagle feather when they speak will likely be debated more then. The Speaker may rule tonight - or may reserve his decision.
For context: props are not allowed in the Senate. No charts. No T-shirts with slogans. But is an eagle feather a prop? Or more akin to a sacred symbol?
There's lots of talk on Twitter today about whether we should take down the Grey Nuns mural in the Grandin LRT station. I talked about that issue of @aaronpaquette last winter, as part of @AlbertaUnbound. Here's an excerpt. #yeg#yegheritage
Here's my whole conversation with Aaron about truth, reconciliation, the intergenerational legacy of residential schools, and how we, as Albertans and Canadians, need to confront (and depict) that history. podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/s2-…@aaronpaquette@AlbertaUnbound
Aaron and I recorded that conversation in December - before the horrible details of the Kamloops burials were known, but with both of us well aware of the horrific legacy of residential schools. But I feel as if last week's news was an epiphany and turning point for many.