The bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act which passed November 6th is the largest investment in clean energy innovation since the Carter Administration. Maybe even bigger than that. (Someone do some inflation adjusted math please). This is way under appreciated!!
And while R&D budgets get a smaller boost (and are trending upwards in regular appropriations budgets), most of this new funding is for demonstration and deployment: hydrogen & air capture hubs, energy storage, nuclear & CCS demos CO2 pipelines & storage, grid investment & more.
There's also significant funding for energy efficiency and weatherization and for supporting US clean energy supply chains and critical materials, especially for batteries.
These programs represent a major, historic expansion of DOE's mission into critical areas beyond R&D, & they passed w/bipartisan support. If enacted well and if they endure, these programs will become a veritable Clean Energy Deployment Administration like we've never had before!
For more details on what's in the Infrastructure Bill for clean energy innovation, see the REPEAT Project summary of programs at bit.ly/REPEAT-Policies
PS, while these energy innovation programs are critical & historic, they focus on the techs we need for the 2030s/40s to get to net-zero. The Infrastructure Bill wont drive big emissions reductions this decade. For that we need to pass Build Back Better. repeatproject.org/docs/REPEAT_Pr…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
REPEAT Project update: Since 10/20 release of our Preliminary Report, the House passed the Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act on 11/6 + introduced a new version of Build Back Better on 11/3.
There are a significant number of changes to the Build Back Better Act, which the REPEAT Project has carefully documented along with a thorough catalog of all climate and clean energy provisions in the final Infrastructure Bill at bit.ly/REPEAT-Policies.
This new Addendum compiles emissions results from our original analysis of ‘BBB 1.0’ (from 9/27) WITHOUT the Clean Electricity Performance Program (the most substantive single change from BBB 1.0 to BBB 2.0) + our initial analysis of the Infrastructure Bill impacts.
I've seen a lot of reporting on my area of expertise that makes me cringe or yell at the screen, while prompting skepticism about how well the outlet covers other topics I dont know much about. Not so in this case! Very accurate and, just a TAD more entertaining than my lectures.
How many EVs does each state need on the road in 2030? How much land will solar or wind need? How large will the energy workforce be? @Princeton Net-Zero America study FINAL REPORT is out & our state-level data viewer can answer these and other questions netzeroamerica.princeton.edu
Also NEW in the Net-Zero America final report: 1. A summay report excerpting key findings from the 348 slide full report.
2. Dozens of new sensitivity cases to explore the impact of key uncertainties (see Annex B for detailed info).
3. Detailed mapping or "downscaling" of wind, solar & transmission build-out for more pathways (plus an updated city-to-city transmission planning optimization method).
Caveat emptor: Any errors in interpretation or reading of the legislative text are our own.
Here's a run-down of some key changes as the bill has evolved from "BBB 1.0" -- the $3.5 trillion dollar package introduced in Sept. which we modeled previously at repeatproject.org -- to this $1.85 trillion version moving towards a vote potentially later today... 🧵
The @AndlingerCenter@Princeton is searching for TWO new assistant professors to join our multidisciplinary faculty and work on the biggest challenges in sustainable energy production & use. #AcademicJobs#EnergyTwitter:
The 1st search (puwebp.princeton.edu/AcadHire/apply…) in the field of sustainable energy and environmental science, engineering and technology is focused on researchers with expertise in decarbonizing industries, such as in chemicals, fuels, materials, and water beyond the power sector.
The 2nd search (puwebp.princeton.edu/AcadHire/apply…) is focused on candidates with expertise in energy economics, energy finance, decision & behavioral sciences, or law related to energy technology & the env. incl. policy and technology adoption related to energy transitionss & GHG reduction
It's been fast & furious around here, so I've not had time to share some fun news: as of this month, I've joined the Advisory Board of @Eavor, developer of advanced closed-loop geothermal energy technology. Clean, firm, flexible power, widely available. eavor.com
My research has consistently illustrated the value of 'clean firm power' -- available any time of the year, as long as needed -- as critical complement to 'fuel saving' variable renewables & energy-limited 'fast burst' batteries or demand flexibility. eg: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Furthermore, we find that FLEXIBLE firm resources are more valuable than those that operate constantly as always-on "baseload" generation. When prices are zero much of the time, producing flat out all the time isn't as valuable as shifting your output to the most vaulable times.