The directly comparable age ranges we have are 0-14 years from ONS and from the paper.
The authors found 16 deaths in 0-14 yr olds from 1 March 2020 - 28 Feb 2021.
For same period, ONS reported 12 deaths. Note that all ONS child deaths in that year were in England. 3/10
So if anything ONS was an underestimate in 1st year.
This could be because in the early months, the late Covid complication of Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS-TS) was not well recognised?
So how reassuring are these low numbers in year 1? 4/10
Well, during year 1, many public health measures were in place in and out of schools, inc 3 lockdowns. Schools were often shut.
This was a pre-Delta era, when Covid was less infectious.
Now restrictions have mostly gone. Schools are open with hardly any mitigations. 5/10
And the consequences are clear to see from ONS registrations.
Since 1 Mar 2021, ONS recorded another 19 0-14 yr old deaths from Covid (inc 1 in Wales).
Most recent week will be an underestimate as death certification can take a while. It is already highest week so far. 6/10
So yes, children are much much less likely to die from Covid than adults. But tragically, it can still happen.
From comparison with the paper, we know ONS is accurate & not an overestimate.
The situation pre Mar 2021 has very little in common with situation *now*. 7/10
Covid is rampaging through schools & is taking its toll in children - in 1000s new cases of long covid, in over 6,000 hospital admissions with Covid in under 18s since March & 19 deaths in 0-14 yr olds.
SAGE reported that 80% of child admissions with Covid are due to Covid. 8/10
We should *not* be taking the Nature Medicines paper as licence to let Covid infect children freely - especially not with vax for 12+ & close (maybe!) in 5-11 yr olds.
Schools must be open but with quicker vax, masks in secondary schools, CO2 monitors & HEPA filters etc
9/10
Finally, media focus on "healthy child" deaths is just wrong as if deaths in vulnerable kids matter less.
Deaths also more likely in non-white children.
Vulnerable kids are in school & can't shield. Lower transmission rates *protect them*. We should be demanding it. 10/10
🧵The line from Boris Johnson that Europe's Covid wave might come here is *arrant nonsense* - just convenient cover if cases climb this winter.
We've been having this wave ever since end of June.
It's driven here - as elsewhere in Europe - by local context not importation 1/5
National Covid trajectory is determined by combo of: 1. public health measures (masks, ventilation, which venues are open, vax passports, testing, isolation etc) & behaviours, 2. vax rates (inc boosters) 3. levels of prev immunity
If it's spreading, combo not enough. 2/5
England relied basically on 2 since June and it's not been enough. We've now got 2 and (sadly!) 3 & it's still not bring cases down.
E Europe has nowhere near enough 2 (hence high deaths too).
Germany & Austria are lower on 2 and 3. NL, Belgium stopped 1 (esp in schools). 3/5
Quick THREAD on cases & admissions in England & schools...
Cases fell in England for about 2 weeks but started going up again last week.
Some of this increase will reflect more testing again since half term (and positivity rates have fallen a little). 1/9
Reductions were driven by steep drops in school age kids (esp 10-14 yrs), which started week before half term.
Apart from less testing, chains of transmission were broken with continued fall week after half term.
Recent uptick tho, esp 5-9 unvaxxed.
60+ fall, boosters? 2/9
Plausible that 10 days is approx the time it takes for new chains of transmission in school to take hold & drive cases up again. Despite high prev infections.
Leicestershire schools had term & half term week earlier & they are seeing sustained increases in school kids again 3/9
The report looked at learning loss in Primary (yrs 4-6) and Secondary (yrs 7-9) school students during pandemic in Reading and Maths (Primary only) using the standardised Star Assessment method which accounts for age.
What did it find? 2/11
Firstly, they assessed loss in Oct 2020 after initial long lockdown & again in July 2021. There was a lot of lost learning initially - and some catch up since so things are better by summer 2021 than they were, but kids have *not* caught up (which would be zero lost months). 3/11
Short THREAD:
In the JCVI minutes from 29 June, the committe had modelling evidence from TWO groups showing significant benefit in vaccinating teens - including preventing deaths.
They dismissed it.
Two models from Warwick and PHE showed "substantial reduction in hospitalisations of 12-17 year olds". Both models estimated vax would prevent 3 deaths per million kids vaxxed. (2/million in prev healthy children).
Warwick also showed LARGE REDUCTION in INFECTIONS.
The JCVI remained unmoved. They thought opportunity costs (affecting school vax progs) & potential harms from vax (although they earlier acknowledged vax myocarditis was q mild) outweighed benefit (but no numbers to support).
They also touted natural infection as better *again*