Share this page!

Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
Twitter logo
15 Nov, 4 tweets, 1 min read
Could the media pls stop the hyper-criticism of Biden? It’s stupid and insulting to the intelligence. He’s been in office for 10 months. He successfully passed #Covid relief & infrastructure bills. These are huge accomplishments. Is he the “bestest” POTUS ever? No. 1/
Is he the worst? No. Is he 10 billion times better than Trump? Yes. Will inflation continue to plague us after supply disruptions resolve? Perhaps. Today’s media appears to thrive on chaos and dissension. Profitable? Yes. Healthy for our Republic? No. Our nation 2/
requires a base line for all media to report above. The fairness doctrine won’t work due to the advent and proliferation of social media. We require a modern version which disallows intentional distortion of facts and the manufacturing of false narratives which aim to 3/
undermine truth and reality. X

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Andrew C Laufer, Esq

Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lauferlaw

Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
13 Oct
So it appears that the @January6thCmte subpoenas for records have not been complied with. The production of these documents are necessary for the committee to both conduct and enhance their ability to question witnesses under oath. Without them, it /1
it will be much more difficult to conduct questioning since these key documents weren’t produced. Bannon and Patel have be subpoenaed to appear tmr while Meadows and Scavino are to appear on Thursday. The committee claims they’re engaged w Patel & Meadows. Usually that means 2/
the parties are negotiating what documents are subject to the subpoena & when they will testify. In the present instance, I believe this type of negotiation to be a mistake. The Committee should demand production of what they deem necessary to conduct their investigation 3/
Read 13 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
12 Oct
After taking some time to consider what @AdamKinzinger stated regarding the criminal referral of non-compliant subpoenaed persons to DOJ, I’ve determined that this the wrong way to proceed. Congress needs to hold these individuals in inherent contempt if they do not comply w 1/
the #January6thCommittee subpoenas. They need to be taken into custody & imprisoned until compliance. Just like a judge presiding over a Grand Jury, Congress has the power to imprison individuals until documents are produced and testimony is garnered. 2/
If you allow DOJ and the Courts to do Congress’s job, you’re ceding your authority to the other branches. If the House flips during the midterms, these putative witnesses will run out the clock until the new Congress is seated. If you’re worried about opening 3/
Read 8 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
11 Sep
If I can make one request this 9/11 anniversary, it would be to stop politicizing the attacks. Al Qaeda’s assault wasn’t only against democrats, republicans, or independents. They attacked all of us. They attacked what we stand for. They attacked our freedom and democracy. 1/
They attacked America. When the list of the victims is read, I don’t hear what political party they belonged to. I hear their names and the pain their deaths brought to all of us. I am also reminded of the thousands of deaths that are still occurring decades after 2/
due to the toxins first responders, volunteers, and those who worked and lived downtown were exposed to. That’s what 9/11 is about. The victims memories and how we all came together to morn the loss and confront those responsible for the heinous attacks. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
15 Jul
Our enemies want us to believe that the only choice for America is between Trumpist autocracy and Marxist-Leninist - Communism. They want us thinking in a binary manner, driven by emotion, into choosing one or the other. Balkanizing into diametrically opposed camps 1/
with bloodshed not far behind. It is imperative that we continue to keep our eye on the ball using rational thought and logic. Trump has been defeated but not Trumpism. It’s easy for us to fall back into comfortable old habits. Being lazy and politically ambivalent. 2/
That’s the last thing we should do. We can still lose our Republic. If we fail in our vigilance, a smarter Trump or a savvy extremist from the left could still come to power. Same goal, different methods. Social and political upheaval shredding the fabric of America. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
7 Jun
Thread re: #CryinMo , Service of Process, and Insurance coverage.

We see here Mo cryin’ like a colicky baby. Why is that? The reason is his wife was just served with process - a lawsuit - righteously instituted by @RepSwalwell for #CryinMo ‘s antics inciting an insurrection 1/
on January 6th. Now you may ask, but they didn’t serve him. Don’t they have to do that in order to have “good” or proper service? No. A process server - plaintiff hires a company - can serve a person “of suitable age and discretion.” In this case, it’s #CryinMo ‘s wife. 2/
She’s someone who resides with him, over 18 years of age, and not active duty military - can be called away at a moments notice and unable to inform service target of the lawsuit - so she fits the criteria for someone being of “suitable age and discretion.” Now #CryinMo can 3/
Read 9 tweets
Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture
11 Apr
I watch the entire footage that’s been made public. The officers had probable cause for a traffic stop to check on his temp tags. However, the did not have PC to deploy this type of force against Lt. Nazario, a member of the National Guard. PC to detain and force are two 1/
separate things. LEOs require PC in each instance. There’s a claim by the apprehending officers that there was a 90 second delay between the direction to stop and when Nazario pulled over. Has this been substantiated? And if so, by whom? If true, it still doesn’t justify 2/
the force deployed against him. The officers did not have probable cause to search him or the vehicle. Hence, excessive force. Whoever deployed pepper spray and assaulted Nazario should be fired and charged. If he improperly displayed his temp tags, give him a summons 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @lauferlaw has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @lauferlaw!

Read all threads by @lauferlaw

:(