@kimberlynicholas.bsky.social Profile picture
Nov 17, 2021 11 tweets 9 min read Read on X
"Talking about #Climate in a Rapidly Changing World"
Fabulous @DrKateMarvel keynote on writing for the public (even if it might hurt your academic career), an Up Goer Five abstract, diversity, poetry & more. THREAD of highlights:

(Env. Research 2021 conference, @IOPPublishing)
Climate discussion in the US has (too) long focused on denial-- not "believing" scientific facts. But we don't just face denial, but also apathy and misunderstanding and helplessness and despair. More data, reports, powerpoints does not change people's minds, says @DrKateMarvel
Some real talk -- climate scientists like @DrKateMarvel face harassment and name calling for clearly communicating science. #scicomm won't help and might hurt your academic career. BUT-- the world needs scientists speaking out, and we should do it anyway. 3/
We need a diverse climate stories, messages, and messengers! To reach @WSJ readers, that's business leaders. And the lack of diversity in science is "not just a problem but an existential threat, we're not asking the right questions and seeking the world's talent" @DrKateMarvel
Scientists, ready to write for the public?

@DrKateMarvel has excellent advice:

READ-- both fiction (expand horizons, power of storytelling) and nonfiction.

WRITE! You can't write without writing. "Keep typing until it turns into writing" (David Carr)
Great writing advice from @DrKateMarvel - "get uncomfortable." Try new forms of writing, like turning a scientific abstract into a simple #UpGoerFive story, or even poetry (not shown by request, but it was excellent and made me LOL).
Scientists writing for the public: remember, you're competing for your reader's attention against EVERY other distraction on Earth. The 1st para is make or break to hook them. Learn from how journalists turn science into a gripping story, like @blkahn @EARTH3R says @DrKateMarvel
Scientists: understand how journalists work, 2-way street, respect their expertise, and go where they are-- which is far too often right here:
"I now don't spend much time on Twitter, but you know who does, more than is good for them: Journalists." -@DrKateMarvel #scicomm
Scientists, if you want to write directly for the public like @DrKateMarvel, you can pitch your own writing to editors. theopennotebook.com has examples of successful pitches. Make sure it covers why this story needs to be written, for this publication, by you.
"There's so much demand for climate knowledge from media, private sector, govts... & so much supply from younger generations ready to speak out. Universities are the bottleneck, which is very silly; they're hard to change, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try." @DrKateMarvel 👏

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with @kimberlynicholas.bsky.social

@kimberlynicholas.bsky.social Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KA_Nicholas

Apr 13, 2023
"Red pill" climate talk from the inimitable @KevinClimate - argues 1.5°C of warming is the upper limit of what can be considered achieving the goal of Paris: avoiding dangerous climate change. Climate just responds to brutal physics, not promises. 1/ ImageImageImage
"'1.5 is dead' is deliberately misleading, or a misunderstanding of science" says @KevinClimate. We'd take the medical treatment with a 1/6 chance; there is still an outside chance. Reductions needed are incredibly rapid, can't see making blue line (50%) but red possible. /2 ImageImageImageImage
Divide the carbon pie (budget) wrt equity, developed countries lead: blue = developed countries, must get to zero emissions ca. 2031. Only 18% world lives in blue; more onerous per cap on developing countries. For 2°C, C budget ca 2x that for 1.5, still small! @KevinClimate /3 ImageImageImage
Read 15 tweets
Mar 20, 2023
Now live-tweeting the #IPCC #ClimateReport press conference, sharing results from the largest scientific effort to analyze the #ClimateAction needed for a livable future for all.
Follow here and in this THREAD:
1/
"The pace and scale of what has been done, and current plans, are insufficient to tackle climate change. We are walking when we should be sprinting. Impacts include illness and death, damage global economy, threaten our life support system." H-S Lee, #IPCC #ClimateReport /2
Effective, equitable action now can lead to more sustainable, just world; benefits for people and nature. Many feasible and effective options. Must cut global GHG emissions by almost half by 2030 "if we want a chance to stay at/below 1.5°C" H-S Lee #IPCC #ClimateReport /3
Read 24 tweets
Mar 16, 2023
Scientists, don't separate activism and research, urges @JKSteinberger. We need ongoing critical reflection; only way to understand a system is try to change it. Activism critical to system change.
1/
Relatively little social science studies effectiveness of less powerful groups in making system change. @JKSteinberger shares lessons from THIS IS AN UPRISING on non-violent civil disobedience. Focus on disruption, decentralized, shift debate to your terms, choose moral sides /2
Traditional appeals to power (e.g., @GretaThunberg outside Parliament) risks surface responses like declaring climate emergency w/o real action; then must fight portrayal of action in media. @JKSteinberger uses her power (as a citizen & scientist), shares lessons learned. /3
Read 13 tweets
Oct 27, 2022
The logic of "overshoot": dominant approach (scientific, corporate, gov't) is now to temporarily exceed 1.5 or 2°C warming, then bring temperatures down using carbon removal, + maybe solar geoengineering; argument is this "buys time to finally get rid of fossils." @wim_carton
Overshoot narrative relies on "rational optimism"- assumes carbon removal, solar geoengineering can be governed smoothly + responsibly. This assumption is "Rather problematic... if capitalism was rational & responsible, we wouldn't face overshoot in the 1st place!" -@wim_carton
Unpacking assumptions behind "overshoot" of climate targets:
1. Reversibility (what about tipping points, risks @ extremes? Even if temp reversible, sea level rise, permafrost, ice, species, ocean acidification,... are not)
-@wim_carton
Read 5 tweets
Oct 14, 2022
As the climate scientist who led the independent @ResearchersDesk analysis of Sweden's political parties' climate policies, I'm infuriated to read the new government's agreement claim "politics must be in line with research and based on facts," then do the opposite. THREAD Image
For example, @kdriks leader @BuschEbba told @dagensnyheter @linalund “Sweden will manage the climate transformation and meet our share of the Paris Agreement.” But our @ResearchersDesk analysis found proposals by the parties now in power will NOT meet the Paris Agreement. 2/n
KD and SD placed heavy emphasis on nuclear power before the election, and nuclear is a (the?) main plank of the agreement released today. However, our analysis showed nuclear is unlikely to reduce emissions before 2030, thus wasting our chance at avoiding climate catastrophe. 3/n
Read 10 tweets
Jun 7, 2022
Large-scale land acquisitions (foreign interests buy/lease land) often claim to support #foodsecurity.

But our study in @WorldDevJournal w/ @A_Mechiche & @Jiyagbi found deals are likely to benefit food security in only 7 African countries. 1/n🧵
sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Map of African countries studied for their food security ben
Food security = available + access + utilisation + stability (@FAOKnowledge). We developed indicators of each for African countries in our study; found food insecurity across Africa decreased since 2000 (good!), but only 3 countries were relatively food secure in 2017 (bad) 2/n
Instead of providing food security, we found the best lands are allocated to flex crops; food is produced only on marginal lands. 83% of land deals are located where they risk increasing land pressure, conflicts, or deforestation. 3/n
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(