"Talking about #Climate in a Rapidly Changing World"
Fabulous @DrKateMarvel keynote on writing for the public (even if it might hurt your academic career), an Up Goer Five abstract, diversity, poetry & more. THREAD of highlights:
Climate discussion in the US has (too) long focused on denial-- not "believing" scientific facts. But we don't just face denial, but also apathy and misunderstanding and helplessness and despair. More data, reports, powerpoints does not change people's minds, says @DrKateMarvel
Some real talk -- climate scientists like @DrKateMarvel face harassment and name calling for clearly communicating science. #scicomm won't help and might hurt your academic career. BUT-- the world needs scientists speaking out, and we should do it anyway. 3/
We need a diverse climate stories, messages, and messengers! To reach @WSJ readers, that's business leaders. And the lack of diversity in science is "not just a problem but an existential threat, we're not asking the right questions and seeking the world's talent" @DrKateMarvel
READ-- both fiction (expand horizons, power of storytelling) and nonfiction.
WRITE! You can't write without writing. "Keep typing until it turns into writing" (David Carr)
Great writing advice from @DrKateMarvel - "get uncomfortable." Try new forms of writing, like turning a scientific abstract into a simple #UpGoerFive story, or even poetry (not shown by request, but it was excellent and made me LOL).
Scientists writing for the public: remember, you're competing for your reader's attention against EVERY other distraction on Earth. The 1st para is make or break to hook them. Learn from how journalists turn science into a gripping story, like @blkahn@EARTH3R says @DrKateMarvel
Scientists: understand how journalists work, 2-way street, respect their expertise, and go where they are-- which is far too often right here:
"I now don't spend much time on Twitter, but you know who does, more than is good for them: Journalists." -@DrKateMarvel#scicomm
Scientists, if you want to write directly for the public like @DrKateMarvel, you can pitch your own writing to editors. theopennotebook.com has examples of successful pitches. Make sure it covers why this story needs to be written, for this publication, by you.
"There's so much demand for climate knowledge from media, private sector, govts... & so much supply from younger generations ready to speak out. Universities are the bottleneck, which is very silly; they're hard to change, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try." @DrKateMarvel 👏
"Red pill" climate talk from the inimitable @KevinClimate - argues 1.5°C of warming is the upper limit of what can be considered achieving the goal of Paris: avoiding dangerous climate change. Climate just responds to brutal physics, not promises. 1/
"'1.5 is dead' is deliberately misleading, or a misunderstanding of science" says @KevinClimate. We'd take the medical treatment with a 1/6 chance; there is still an outside chance. Reductions needed are incredibly rapid, can't see making blue line (50%) but red possible. /2
Divide the carbon pie (budget) wrt equity, developed countries lead: blue = developed countries, must get to zero emissions ca. 2031. Only 18% world lives in blue; more onerous per cap on developing countries. For 2°C, C budget ca 2x that for 1.5, still small! @KevinClimate /3
Now live-tweeting the #IPCC#ClimateReport press conference, sharing results from the largest scientific effort to analyze the #ClimateAction needed for a livable future for all.
Follow here and in this THREAD:
1/
"The pace and scale of what has been done, and current plans, are insufficient to tackle climate change. We are walking when we should be sprinting. Impacts include illness and death, damage global economy, threaten our life support system." H-S Lee, #IPCC#ClimateReport /2
Effective, equitable action now can lead to more sustainable, just world; benefits for people and nature. Many feasible and effective options. Must cut global GHG emissions by almost half by 2030 "if we want a chance to stay at/below 1.5°C" H-S Lee #IPCC#ClimateReport /3
Scientists, don't separate activism and research, urges @JKSteinberger. We need ongoing critical reflection; only way to understand a system is try to change it. Activism critical to system change. 1/
Relatively little social science studies effectiveness of less powerful groups in making system change. @JKSteinberger shares lessons from THIS IS AN UPRISING on non-violent civil disobedience. Focus on disruption, decentralized, shift debate to your terms, choose moral sides /2
Traditional appeals to power (e.g., @GretaThunberg outside Parliament) risks surface responses like declaring climate emergency w/o real action; then must fight portrayal of action in media. @JKSteinberger uses her power (as a citizen & scientist), shares lessons learned. /3
The logic of "overshoot": dominant approach (scientific, corporate, gov't) is now to temporarily exceed 1.5 or 2°C warming, then bring temperatures down using carbon removal, + maybe solar geoengineering; argument is this "buys time to finally get rid of fossils." @wim_carton
Overshoot narrative relies on "rational optimism"- assumes carbon removal, solar geoengineering can be governed smoothly + responsibly. This assumption is "Rather problematic... if capitalism was rational & responsible, we wouldn't face overshoot in the 1st place!" -@wim_carton
Unpacking assumptions behind "overshoot" of climate targets: 1. Reversibility (what about tipping points, risks @ extremes? Even if temp reversible, sea level rise, permafrost, ice, species, ocean acidification,... are not)
-@wim_carton
As the climate scientist who led the independent @ResearchersDesk analysis of Sweden's political parties' climate policies, I'm infuriated to read the new government's agreement claim "politics must be in line with research and based on facts," then do the opposite. THREAD
For example, @kdriks leader @BuschEbba told @dagensnyheter@linalund “Sweden will manage the climate transformation and meet our share of the Paris Agreement.” But our @ResearchersDesk analysis found proposals by the parties now in power will NOT meet the Paris Agreement. 2/n
KD and SD placed heavy emphasis on nuclear power before the election, and nuclear is a (the?) main plank of the agreement released today. However, our analysis showed nuclear is unlikely to reduce emissions before 2030, thus wasting our chance at avoiding climate catastrophe. 3/n
Food security = available + access + utilisation + stability (@FAOKnowledge). We developed indicators of each for African countries in our study; found food insecurity across Africa decreased since 2000 (good!), but only 3 countries were relatively food secure in 2017 (bad) 2/n
Instead of providing food security, we found the best lands are allocated to flex crops; food is produced only on marginal lands. 83% of land deals are located where they risk increasing land pressure, conflicts, or deforestation. 3/n