Had a few questions paused to me. As one of the very first on SM to welcome Farmers’ Laws, I am happy to express my take on the repeal.
1. This is a temporary change in the course of this reform. @narendramodi Ji has studied issues for over 20 years.
2. What is so shocking about this repeal? In January this year, GOI agreed to suspend these laws for 18 months until a workable solution is found.
The protestors did not agree. GOI met with the protestors very many times, agreed to change/amend and even revise the terms on MSP.
The protestors did not agree to any proposal from the Govt.
The protestors did not even participate in Supreme Court’s proposal of the panel.
After exhausting all options, Govt decided to repeal. What is there to feel emotional about this?
3. Modi has not promised to repeal laws that are currently in place. Remember, these laws were already suspended by the Supreme Court in January this year.
4. Yes, there will be political benefit in doing this now - especially for the orchestrations in Punjab with the Captain.
But more than that, there is security in question.
Large scale bloodbath and riots and terror acts planned in Punjab and UP under the guise of protesting farmer laws.
In Punjab, mainly targeting Captain who is important to pull the plug on Congress.
5. This is NOT the end of the story. These laws will certainly come back through the committee being set up. Next time it comes, it stays.
6. In a democracy, there is nothing wrong in changing a policy or approach to preserve larger interests of the nation.
Would you have preferred blood bath and terror in UP and Punjab for the next few weeks instead?
7. Modi Ji or BJP has not conceded or defeated if these laws will come back through a new process. This Modi Ji has promised.
8. Finally, stop seeing everything from an emotional angle. Modi is not acting in a thriller movie. Stop seeing everything in binary - 'either or'
It’s more like playing Chess. Some moves are more tactical and important for the win.
Why should you judge Modi based on a single decision?
I mean he had his backbone intact when he abrogated Art 370, and did surgical strikes.
Suddenly his spine has taken a vacation?
Stop watching movies, and start applying critical thinking. You will be alright.
Western countries are better in this sense. They understand political manoeuvres of their governments and support their leaders.
I have known @PMOIndia enough to know every decision he takes is good for my people, and my country.
The competitive game India has been able to play in recent times gives hope not only to our own future, but also to countries that look upon India as a friend, philosopher and guide.
Keeping our civilisational integrity in the world driven by consumerism; and preserving India’s long legacy of being the Culture Guru of the world is a challenge India can only tide over with careful planning beyond the current geopolitics.
• An inherently proud generation to take on the world.
Age and skills do not bring home the demographic dividends. A national pride is needed.
How India can achieve this in the face of manipulative social engineering is a clear challenge for us.
Making Ajit Doval the National Security Advisor was a much-anticipated move.
However, little did the world expect that a country like India would have the craft and dare to define its own terms while
it’s still a developing country.
Narendra Modi’s new style of leadership powered by Subramaniam Jaishankar’s diplomatic orchestrations and Doval’s formidable combination of master strategy and meticulous footwork enabled India to wield a commanding position in the
emerging multi-polar world.
Modi’s swearing in ceremony asserted India’s lead role in the SAARC countries, but it was the Paris summit on climate change that displayed India’s changing geopolitics in the world arena.
It was obvious from the declaration of ‘climate justice’ by
A world order but in India’s terms: emerging Indian geopolitics - Sreevidya Balasubramaniam
In this thread, I unpack @narendramodi Ji's geopolitics from an outside perspective. To show contrast, I am giving a brief of the past diplomacy as part 1.
India’s past foreign policy
Non-alignment was a foreign policy instrument India followed since her independence.
It sat on a pile of post-war assumptions of the emerging world order. Promoting peace made the core of India’s foreign policy as a pre-condition to development.
However, this policy had long become redundant in the face of a ballooning war economy globally.
Like many domestic policies post-independence, non-alignment was also strongly influenced by the socialist ideas in support of the Soviet Union in the protracted bipolar power-
their so called opposition is shamefully struggling to figure out who their leader today is.
This being the context, our intellectuals start advising how we don’t have a robust ‘opposition’ and the importance of having an opposition.
This is the biggest collective delusion.
If judiciary can work without ideology and opposition, then why can’t the Legislature and Executive work without a political process which costs a fortune, forcing parties to be at war constantly?
What is ideology? Why should ideology lead a group of people?