their so called opposition is shamefully struggling to figure out who their leader today is.
This being the context, our intellectuals start advising how we don’t have a robust ‘opposition’ and the importance of having an opposition.
This is the biggest collective delusion.
If judiciary can work without ideology and opposition, then why can’t the Legislature and Executive work without a political process which costs a fortune, forcing parties to be at war constantly?
What is ideology? Why should ideology lead a group of people?
Ideology should be personal. Dangerous if it becomes collective.
Indian Defence system is one of the most patriotic. They sit on arms, secret information, and skills. The leaders of defence don’t work well because there is opposition watching or there is an ideology.
Each humble Jawan who lays his life for the country is doing it for no ideology, but his personal value called patriotism.
The greatest of surgeons don’t operate well because there is an opposition in every hospital, nor an ideology that leads him.
No judge gives a fair judgment because there is opposition bench or ideology.
Our health, our defence, our economy, our justice, our infrastructure, our agriculture – we get medical help, we are protected, we have utilities and facilities, we have food on our plate -
and none of these came with a strong opposition watching. Why then we have the entity that govern all that must be any different?
Can it not be a different process based on meritocracy?
Doesn’t this inherently suggest that the political system lacks complete trust of people,
and therefore, the politicians need to be watched?
In a constituency, a candidate wins if she gets more vote than everyone else. She gets 30% and becomes their representative even though 70% of people opposed her.
Strange that this is sold to us as the system of democracy
that must govern us, and we are also told that this is the best system.
Who decided this is democracy?
This is simply collectivism – a form of transferring power from voter to the representative who becomes superior to common man with that power.
The moment he is elected, he becomes untrustworthy.
So, why at all have this system?
It has failed in every country. If the revolving door, the campaign money, the lobbying of corporatocracy spoilt the great American democracy, the political correctness and Hegelian equation
destroyed policy making of the West resulting in shifting chaos.
Gold, oil, and forest destroyed the stability of African and South American countries and created never ending unrest in the middle east.
Robbed India of our ability to rebuild after the millennium-long invasion
of aliens on our land.
Corruption is the face of the present democratic order of the world.
What inherent weakness led countries succumb to corruption?
It did not even spare a country like Japan before Abe – despite their world-renowned discipline.
What made India’s opposition sing the tunes of our hostile neighbours?
Which Congress frontline worker is happy to do that?
Still they are doing this under the collective hysteria of ideology.
It made a section of our people hate a patriot like Modi whom they have
absolutely no personal conflict with.
Enmity is always personal.
If we feel hatred towards someone we don’t know personally, then that is a conditioned state of mind.
Politics or manmade religions are the tools of conditioning.
It’s like what Jergović compared as the ‘pack of dogs in the park’. He said if a single dog chased you, it’s natural.
But if a pack did it, then they are conditioned.
If I can trust people in every other profession that directly affects my life, then I see nothing wrong in
trusting a leader like Narendramodi.
I say this toxic political system must stop.
We must start thinking what is best for our country and develop a system that works for all.
In Part 3, I analyse the flaws of democracy and suggest an alternative model.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a quick note. I normally do not indulge in poll speculations, but this time, I want to say with reasonable conviction that @AIADMKOfficial (NDA) will come back to power on May 2.
MANUFACTURING Dl55ENT AND MODI'S RESPONSE - AN ANALYSIS
DlS5ENT is allowed in a democracy. Any democratic leader or government will uphold - and MUST uphold its citizens's right to DlS5ENT.
This thread analyses the recent Indian experience.
Some years ago, a western country displayed a movie on India in their visitor centre. Showed @Narendramodi the then Gujarat CM as a devil incarnate drinking the blood of MU5LlM.
A tough battle with the authorities resulted in taking down this video.
Lesson - this obscure country which Modi never visited till date has little to do with Indian politics. Yet, there is this need to stop Modi in his tracks of becoming the future PM by smearing him.
Most of you may have noticed Modi as a potential PM in the last decade.
My short thread on RK was focusing on the challenges RK will face. Key points.
1. I said that if Rajini couldn’t enter the “Rajini” style, hen he won’t enter at all. His announcement yesterday reflects it.
2. His followers are not united by a cause or ideology but by the mutual attraction towards a hero.
This will cause issues going forward as their bond will have to be a continuous guidance and inspiration from their leader who couldn't spare that energy or time due to his health
I had predicted in my first thread in November that Rajini won't form a third front.
So, when RK announced his political entry, I was surprised for two reasons:
1. when he announced his entry in 2017 there was a political vacuum in Tamil Nadu.