1/ Don't celebrate too early.
It has already been a trend that a project ➡️a platform➡️a chain.
Is there such a possibility that limited retention and gameplay cannot support the game itself, thus it figures out a larger narrative to draw people's attention back ?
It has already been a trend that a project ➡️a platform➡️a chain.
Is there such a possibility that limited retention and gameplay cannot support the game itself, thus it figures out a larger narrative to draw people's attention back ?
2/ The situation reminds me of how traditional corporates compete for users:
the amount of users is fixed but projects boom, and those projects without core gameplay can only rely on platforms and chains to increase their exposure.
the amount of users is fixed but projects boom, and those projects without core gameplay can only rely on platforms and chains to increase their exposure.
3/ The consequence of over-hyping "metaverse" and "interoperability" is that people get so excited about the jointing between games and platforms that they forget how an exellent game can stand on its own as a solid and integrated economy.
4/ Perhaps the market for crypto gaming will reach the saturation sooner than we expect but the staggering investment obscures the users' participation.
So dive into development, bring traditional gamers in, and stop making webs with only concept paintings.
So dive into development, bring traditional gamers in, and stop making webs with only concept paintings.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
