Taking a break from COVID and climate change ππ A few updates on various names I've been tweeting about on and off over last few months...in no particular order. May add thoughts ad hoc to this thread later.
As always, I have positions here, DYODD.
ππ
1) Hunter Douglas $HDG.NA. Stock is off a bit post (v strong) earnings, no real change in thesis or biz. 4.5x VY EV/EBITDA, zero debt, insane discount to comps, somewhat illiquid, no-one wants to own.
Still believe Sonnenberg comes back next April to clean up w/ another bid....
Fair value somewhere between 190-240 EUR. Stock is 99 EUR. Acceptable bid? TBD but unlikely south of 140 EUR imo. Frustrating/boring but still a core holding.
2) Amerigo $ARG.TO. Stock is mid 1.30s, 2.5x EV/EBITDA, maybe 3-4x EV/FCF and paying it all out...
...and response to recent tender (just 7-8mm shs tendered at 1.3) suggests its going higher. BUT - I cut my position in mid-1.40s. Not about the valn (obvi still v cheap), but there are major drought issues that could limit production from late next yr....
...excellent co and strong operators. But hard to see it re-rating w/ drought issues, and competing for capital against other commod names trading at similar or low multiples w/out this kind of idiosyncratic risk.
3) Michael Hill $MHJ.AX. Stock now up to ~5x EV/EBIT, w a strong rerate likely as Aus/NZ opens up. Near-term financial perf has been excellent (in context of lockdowns) and stock is still cheap.
That said at >$1.2 it is not the no-brainer it was at 80c when I first discussed...
Still think this is a >$1.5 stock by mid-next yr. That said I have lightened up a bit in recent days, still involved, still like it.
4) Galaxy Gaming $GLXZ. Hardly the axe here (check @MaldenDriveCap@OtterMarket ) but thesis pretty clear and more intact now given the debt...
...funding to take out Triangulum was minimally dilutive and can be called at yr1 or yr 2 w/ no penalty (meaning cost of financing much lower than i anticipated). Stock at ~10x EV/EBITDA w tailwinds from global reopening and obvious takeout target to anyone in igaming content.
I would have a bigger position if IB would let me trade the stock more actively (they've decided I'm an 'affiliate' somehow??). I still like it, prob wake up and they'll be sold to $EVO at $8 a share sometime in the next 2yrs.
5) The Works $WRKS.LN. Prob worthy of a longer thread. Still involved and adding shares. Prob one of the more mispriced smallcaps I cover. 1.7x EV/EBITDA for a biz growing comps double digits. Ecom now ~30% of revs. This seems wild, mgmt not at all promotional, I get it...
...but I think rerate is coming in face of superior financials and barring further UK lockdowns this could easily multibag.
OK thats enough for now, will do a few more later maybe ππ
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We are adding a few more updates on other names. As always, we find these compelling π€ͺ but DYODD.
6) $BWMX. Obvi v frustrating year. I often think if this biz had grown 15-20% in 2020 and then this year it would trade at a higher price than having grown 200% then stoppedβ¦
β¦there are a cpl of issues here re poor IR, lack of management communication, but ultimately this has rerated from high teens P/E to 8x when growth went to near zero. Incredible derate.
If you think they can return to teens growth - something management seems adamant onβ¦
β¦then itβs a crazy bargain. They wonβt get credit for it for at least one more qtr as 4Q will be weak, but Iβve been adding here and there. Stock just far too cheap, v yieldy while we wait.
7) Simonds $SIO.AX. Total dud so far (-20%) and I am bagholding. Maybe 2x EV/ebitda now.
People seem to want my opinion on the Stanmore $SMR.AX BHP coal deal so I will give it.
I hate this transaction for a junior name like SMR.
1) SMR gets no benefit from crazy high current prices (ownership passes at closing). Diff than GLEN.LN deal for Cerrajon, etc....
...so low multiple on current earnings power (2x run-rate EV/EBITDA) is illusory. Multiple is more like 4x+ avg EBITDA. Not cheap (for coal) and certainly a lot richer than $SMR.AX equity...
2) they are levering this w/ $625mm of debt against the asset. Maybe 2x normal EBITDA...
...which given the Indo topco owners, prob won't be cheap. 8% cost of debt? pretty decent chunk of normalized EBITDA less capex (say <$300mm)
3) FIRB review: this may be significant given Indo owners. If $SMR.AX can't close, seems like theres a break fee (undisclosed) but...
Why is this current coal opportunity different than the tanker opportunity (in my view)?
Many names are nowhere near as levered going in and will be clean cap structures by yr end (no matter what happens to spot pxes in the meantime).
Let's look at $RE4.SI one more time...
$RE4.SI last traed 33.5c SGD, putting it on a $470mm SGD mkt cap, or $345mm in USD (their reporting ccy).
They disclosed $62mm net cash as of early-Oct (when they repaid all their bonds).
So all-in EV today is ~$283mm (disregarding Oct-Dec FCF).
Now lets keep in mind a few things. In 1H this yr, when ICI4 (their benchmark) was in the high-$40s, they did $78mm of EBITDA (on lower volumes) and ~$50mm of net income.
Current ICI4 is still well north of $100/t today (who knows how long)...
$690.DE $6690.HK UPDATE - I am giving up on the spread trade (last ~49% discount on the D-share).
Obvi this is a v disappointing outcome as the discount never closed to the levels I thought appropriate (20%).
I will try to unpack a little my thought process...maybe useful πββοΈ
When I wrote it up I expected two things to happen over the course of the year:
1) some less liquidity-sensitive portion of the natural HK/Asian shareholder base to gravitate towards the German line, and exchange liquidity for cheapness; and
2) some progress to be made from..
...the company towards closing the discount (via accretive buybacks/purchase by the parent Haier topco/maybe even the allowal of fungibility).
Looking back on it, I suppose it was perhaps presumptive to conclude the company/Haier topco would care about the discount...
One way to think about what the 'reasonable' valn is for any name w/ idiosyncratic risk like this (Indo tycoon taking away your assets, etc), is benchmark the asset against itself. Ie what have ppl been willing to pay in the past?
Then think, is the same company better or worse (credit, cap allocation, cap returns, governance, etc) versus the average past?
$RE4.SI traded at ~3.8x LTM EV/EBITDA in early 2021 on the basis of FY20 numbers. Last yr they still put up $57mm of EBITDA but no real net earnings...
...and they still carried a bit of gross USD debt ($60mm) - a decent risk for a small-cap Indo co.
Simply using TIKR data, it looks like this shitco has generally traded 2.5-4x EV/EBITDA, on a LTM trailing basis. Avg looks like ~3-3.5x EV/EBITDA: