Behind the scenes I've worked with journalists for a fair few large broadcasters and papers, not just in the UK
The issue is there is an asymmetric battle over the truth
These grifters get platformed by friendly media to spead disinformation, can come out with almost any crap
Yet try and challenge these individuals, their links, money made/raised and its incredible how many hoops must be jumped through, how many barriers are put in the way of those who just want to report the truth.
Editors are very wary
These "grassroot" groups are lawyered up, its cover in the HART leaks that the tactic for any criticism, any attempt to expose them will be hit with heavy handed legal threats.
Us For Them and HART have done this with broadcasters and publishers
Some editors have completely dropped stories, others have demanded stories be watered down massively losing their impact, just seen an example of this occurring in the US around an in depth report on a minimiser hitting a quagmire
This is a regular occurrence, and its infuriating, its why there's so little of this appearing in the news.
If it wasn't so serious it would be funny that the RW commentators responsible for disinformation also bang on about cancel culture all the time
Opaquely funded think tanks linked to those supporting the opaquely funded disinformation groups release reports about the dangers of cancel culture of the importance of freedom of speech while the speech of their opponents is muted
On social media they are quick to block any opposing views, and disagreement, and then attack their critics as alarmist, fanatics etc
They talk of democracy, warn about Big Pharma and orchistrated plans while advancing the coordinated agendas of unelected foreign billionaire
They are the greatest of hypocrites, like saying vaccination should be a choice while trying to deprive parents of the choice of having their children vaccinated.
They try to shut down opposing accounts by triggering the troll pile ons while playing the victim when asked ..
About the validity of their arguments.
Its asymmetric, we dont see masses of dodgy zero covid accounts but there are huge numbers of pro infection troll/bit networks.
Too many editors have been scared off with threats of heavy handed litigation, the lawyers have challenged lockdown, masks in classrooms, vaccination for 12-15, legal threats get sent to schools
Where are the counter challenges, for years ive argued unions should be calling out
The likes of the #TuftonStreetHydra
and I've said the same about the Covid disinformation groups. I've also written to Labour front bench in particular @KateGreenSU regarding schools policy and recieved no reply from her, despite providing hard evidence
However @BylineTimes have been fearless, and you know what?
No court cases, no legal action, because at the end of the day its hollow threats, because the evidence is there.
🧵LibertAryans🧵
Many have mused about the motivations behind the pro-infection herd immunity lobby, many have suggested the attitude behind this has more than a whiff of a eugenics mentality, afteral we know letting it rip hits certain communities harder than others
2/ We can't know the motivations of all those pushing this, there will be a range, but let's focus on those at the top, the rich funders, academics, policy makers and media types from elite institutions.
How much does "covid wont effect me, its other people's problem" play?
3/ In the UK the pandemic started with herd immunity fans arguing that 250k dead elderly and vulnerable was a price worth paying for everyone else to have their "freedom"
The same ppl who argued for essentially a cull then argued for letting it rip but with "focused protection"
🧵Nawaz on @lbc
"Just like WW2 against the M
Nazis, England stands alone as authoritarianism takes hold of europe. But we have hope, the resistance has begun with a new APPG"
As predicted the APPG will mainstream disinformation
Nawaz talks about Big Pharma lobbying, doesn't mention the new APPG is funded and resourced by Collateral Global, a disinformation group which doesn't disclose its funding, but has members linked to AIER/Koch Foundation
Nawaz has David Paton as guest who will be a special witness for the APPGs investigative hearing into pandemic response and recovery
Paton is a member of antivax conspiracy group HART,also quoted by UsForThem and MPs in Westminster Hall opposing 12-15 vax
This is why the UK Statistics Authority wrote to the Tory Party during the 2019GE to reprimand them for claiming "more students are now in outstanding schools than in 2010"
Also reprimanded over funding claims
4 times I believe #edutwitter
This is how UK politics works, policies are designed to produce metrics that can be lauded at elections, the reality on the ground, the impact on real lives isn't important,they just need a stat they can quote and hide behind in the face of questioning. Policies 4 slogans not ppl
Below inflation increases for education, wages and other services allowed them to claim "more money than ever before" while funding" while in real terms we saw an 8% decrease per pupil, lost 15k support staff, reduction in teaching numbers and workload increases
But they already have this power via the covid bill, they've used it several times, Greenwich and to several schools who tried to break up for half term
So @halfon4harlowMP is doing this just for UsForThem/CRG brownie points
Article then gives a platform to people who have been constantly wrong, including GBDs Livermore, and goes on to try and create concern for 5+ vaccines