#Stablecoins are subject to the same barriers and constraints as pre-existing financial options (or higher barriers in some cases, e.g. need for internet and smartphones). They can also introduce important risks on economic and technical levels.
One must closely consider the specific barriers to #financialinclusion that exist in a region and how #stablecoins or other options might address them. Regional context is imperative to addressing the complex challenges with inclusion.
In terms of #DeFi (in which #stablecoins are often used), it doesn't address the financial needs identified. Access is not easy, and value-add relative centralized options is unclear. If we look at #lending, loans are typically over-collateralized and interest rates non-trivial.
There has been a lot of engagement on this tweet. I highly encourage those interested to read the report as it provides much more detail on the complex challenge of financial inclusion than can be communicated on Twitter!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Second-layer solutions (eg LN) reduce transaction validation costs but at the expense of technical resilience (certain nodes need to remain online), locked-up capital, and decentralization. Certain trade-offs are unavoidable. See p. 20 of @RaphAuerbis.org/publ/work765.p…
Permissioned blockchains similarly greatly improve scalability and transaction costs, but at the expense of requiring greater trust and technical resilience among a much smaller set of nodes (again, the solution becomes higher centralization).