The UK published all cause death data from 1/2/21-9/24/21 split out by vaccination status/age group: ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…

In young (10-59yr), all cause deaths in 2 dose group are ~2x higher than unvaccinated.

Does this mean the vaccines are "killing more than they save?"
As I will show in this thread, this conclusion is erroneous, an artifact of Simpson's paradox, since the 10-59yr is far too wide an age range, and vaccination rate and death risk vary substantially from the younger to older end of the age range.
To investigate this, I pulled some public data to try to adjust for the hidden age effects within the 10-59yr age group

First, note how widely the annual death rate per 1000 varies significantly from the young end to older end of the 10yr-59yr age group
ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-…
Here we put it in a table we will use to do the relevant calculations.
Next, consider the variability in vaccination proportion over time across the various age groups, with the younger end of the 10yr-59yr age group having far lower vaccination rates than the older:

coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccin…
Here, I will focus on August 1, which is the end of week 30 with the annotated 1.82x ratio.
Note the extreme variability in vaccination rate, with those in their 40's and 50's much higher vaccination rates than 20's and 30's, and with few teens vaccinated as of 8/1/21.
Also, note the population size of each semi-decade group is not the same, so we also consider the proportion of total UK population within each age group, here for UK from 2019:
populationpyramid.net/united-kingdom…
Here we add it to our spreadsheet with the other data.
Since we are only looking at the 10-59yr population, I normalize the proportions of each semi-decade age group, to yield the age distribution within the 10-59yr cohort.
If we multiply the % vaccinated by % in that age group, we can get the proportion of the 10-59yr population the are (1) vaccinated and (2) in that age group.
By subtracting from 1, we get the proportion of the 10-59yr population that are (1) unvaccinated (haven't gotten 2 doses) within each age group. (This is sufficient for our purposes -- later I will include more nuanced analysis incorporating single-dose vaccinated)
Next, we will normalize each of those two columns by dividing by the respective sums (62.2% and 37.8%) to get the age distribution within the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts in the 10-59yr cohort.
To make easier to see, I plot these age distributions.

Note that the vaccinated in the combined 10-59yr cohort are MUCH older than the unvaccinated.
Here I add in the annual mortality rate per 1k for each age group.

It is not hard to image why we would expect the combined 10-59yr vaccinated cohort to have higher all cause mortality rates than the combined unvaccinated 10-59yr cohort.
To compute the annual death rate per 100k in vaccinated/unvaccinated given their respective age distributions, we use a weighted average: multiplying the age-specific annual death rate and the % of the respective (vaccinated or unvaccinated) cohort in that age group.
We add these numbers to our figure to include the expected annual number of deaths per 100k in each age group.

They are not too different from the 10yr-39yr age groups, but note the major differences in the 40-59yr groups driven by higher vaccination rates and mortality risk.
If we sum across all age groups, we see from the weighted average that the expected combined annual mortality rate for the vaccinated 10-59yr cohort is 184.3, and for the unvaccinated 10-59yr cohort is 75.5.
Here we put the total numbers in our table.

The expected ratio of all cause deaths in the vaccinated to unvaccinated 10-59yr cohort is 184.3/75.6 = 2.44, driven by the extreme variability in age distribution in these cohorts, 2.44/1.82=1.34x higher than what was observed.
Thus, the observed results are not surprising, even lower than expected given the dramatically different age distribution in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts in the 10-59yr age cohort.

Thus, it is a result of Simpson's paradox, and not indicative of vaccine-caused deaths
The older age groups are decade groups with reasonably consistent vaccination rates/death risks within them, so do not suffer such an effect. And all 3 other age groups have all cause death rate ~2x higher in unvaccinated than fully vaccinated (2 doses).

Here is 60-69yr
The older age groups are decade groups with reasonably consistent vaccination rates/death risks within them, so do not suffer such an effect. And all 3 other age groups have all cause death rate ~2x higher in unvaccinated than fully vaccinated (2 doses).

Here is 60-69yr
Here is age 70-79
Here is 80+
There are wonky results for the 1-dose vaccinated in these data, but I save this for a future thread ...
There might be some confusion about the tables I put together above

They are NOT plots of the all cause deaths in vaccinated and unvaccinated from the UK data set

They are calculations of expected death rates of vaccinated/unvaccinated based on their different age distributions
That is, if vaccines did not affect all cause death risk at all, either positively or negatively, the numbers in the table are what we would expect in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups as a result of their (very different) age distributions.
And thus, we would expect based on the difference in age distributions, in week 30, the "vaccinated" subset of 10-59yr should have 2.44x higher all cause death rates than the "uvaccinated" subset 10-59yr even if vaccines did not have any effect on deaths.
Since what was observed was 1.82x, 1.33x lower than expected 2.44x, if anything these data suggest that vaccines are overall reducing all cause death rate within these age groups.

If we could stratify the 10-59yr by decade groups, we would see the unvaccinated death rates higher
oh crap you are right -- I colored the legend backwards. Sorry about that :)
Here is a blog post going into more details on these data:
covid-datascience.com/post/what-do-u…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Jeffrey S Morris

Prof Jeffrey S Morris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jsm2334

23 Nov
Is watching the 1984 Ghostbusters movie killing people?

Recent data show death rate of 10-59yr olds who have watched the 1984 Ghostbuster Movie is 2x higher than those who have watched the 2021 Ghostbuster movie

I don't know how to explain this other than movie-caused mortality Image
I was told by everyone that the 1984 Ghostbusters movie was safe and amusing, and never anticipated it could be so dangerous to young people!

It appears the 2021 film is MUCH safer, and strongly preferred, but this fact has been hidden by conspiracy ImageImage
Digging further, I noticed the probability of seeing 1984 film is higher for those older in the spectrum, while demographic of those watching the 2021 film is much younger.

I guess that makes sense, since for GenX'ers the 1984 movie came out in their childhood and teen years. Image
Read 11 tweets
17 Nov
@surfernan put up the most recent episode of her VAX Files @thevaxfiles, this one dealing with boosters and mandates.

I contributed to the discussion on mandates, discussing evidence for immune protection from previous infection & implication on mandates

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/14-…
Besides me, the other experts interviewed included
Dr. Monica Gahdni @MonicaGandhi9
Dr. Nikolai Petrovsky @vaxine_news
Dr. Nadia Sam-Agudu @NASAdoc
Dr. Miguel O'Ryan @MiguelORyan1
Dr. Andrew Reed
This podcast is exceptionally well put together with tremendous professionalism and polish, providing a clear, balanced, and insightful discussion of boosters and mandates.
Read 10 tweets
17 Nov
Co-author of paper claiming COVID-19 vaccines linked to miscarriage says he’s retracting it – Retraction Watch retractionwatch.com/2021/11/16/co-…
This paper was really embarrassingly ignorant — they purported 91% miscarriage rate from reanalysis of NEJM suggesting miscarriage rate was not high after vaccination.

They take subset of first trimester “completed pregnancies” and noted nearly all ended in miscarriage …
But ignored the fact that given the timing of the study there was no way for the women vaccinated in first trimester to have delivered a full term baby yet, so of course the “completed pregnancies” were the miscarriages.
Read 7 tweets
9 Nov
Just peeked at Israeli MOH 11/9 data on current infection/serious infection rates split out by unvaccinated, boosted, & vax/not boosted.

We see boosted strongly protected vs. infection, and vaccinated/boosted show evidence of waning effectiveness, but still 50-70% VE_infection
For serious disease, again boosted are strongly protected. But even vaccinated/not boosted have much lower severe disease rates than unvaccinated.
Remember, these are CURRENTLY active cases, so only a snapshot, but show (1) strong protection of boosters and (2) Even unboosted vaccinated subpopulation seem to have substantial protection vs. severe disease, at all age groups.
Read 9 tweets
7 Oct
What do currently active cases on Israeli MoH dashboard say about vaccine effectiveness vs. infection/severe disease for those vaccinated and with/without booster?

Here are the current data as of October 7, 2021 after roughly 2 months of delivery of boosters:
These data come from the Israel MoH dashboard from October 7, 2021 (datadashboard.health.gov.il/COVID-19/gener…) and include counts of currently active infections and severe infections by age group, split out by vaccination status (unvaccinated, boosters, or vaccinated but no boosters).
I simply computed "vaccine effectiveness" for vaccine (or booster) as the 1 minus the ratio of the infection (or serious infection) rate for the vaccinated (or boosted) group and the unvaccinated group.

Note that this is only a snapshot of current cases.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(