Pursued On All Sides By Journalists and Congress, Peter Daszak Seeks Refuge At Science Magazine, via @DisInfoChron disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pursued-on-a…
Enough with silly nonreporting reporting, send the subpoenas /1
Enough with silly nonreporting reporting, send the subpoenas /1
It's become clear that, despite assurances from Tim Appenzeller at Science, that publication won't pursue stories about congressional investigations that make Peter Daszak or the NIH look bad. /2
The latest volley from Science is this odd profile of Peter Daszak that Science's Editor-in-Chief made clear on Twitter was for political purposes to undermine opinions that #originsofcovid could have started in a Wuhan lab. This sort of honesty is called a Kinsley gaffe. /3
The fact that Daszak has blocked @alisonannyoung and avoided hard questions from multiple media outlets, but spent an entire days chatting w/ Science Magazine's Jon Cohen explains quite a bit. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pursued-on-a… /4
Back in 2016, Daszak explained to other scientist about the importance of cultivating reporters to maintain funding for his research. "A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype." @zeynep /5
@zeynep We wouldn't know what we know w/o the help of DRASTIC, @USRightToKnow, and hard work by investigative reporters.
We don't need more glowing profiles of Peter Daszak. We need journalism. We need accountability disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pursued-on-a… /6
We don't need more glowing profiles of Peter Daszak. We need journalism. We need accountability disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pursued-on-a… /6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
