My interview w/ author Elaine Dewar on her latest book "On the Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years” about her journey investigating #OriginsOfCovid disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… /1
Elaine Dewar on scientific publishers, "Some—Nature, The Lancet, eMI—turned themselves into platforms for the science equivalent of propaganda." All to stay on the good side of China. #originsofcovid disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… /2
In her book, Dewar notes: in January 2020, Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology submitted a study to @Nature and another study to a different journal that contradicted the Nature paper. Neither have been corrected. (Who peer reviews Nature studies?) #originsofcovid /3
After examining Shi Zhengli, Elaine Dewar asks if she lies: "I had no idea, but I no longer had reason to trust her.” disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con…
QUESTION: Why do science writers trust Shi Zhengli? #originsofcovid /4
Last year, @janeqiuchina wrote a puff piece on Shi Zhengli for @sciam_cn
Elaine Dewar: "Her article on Shi was true to National Geographic’s preferred story form. It was organized around dramatic moments and utterly free of investigative techniques" /5
Canada faced an incredible scandal during #originsofcovid when a Chinese couple working at the NML were caught coordinating dangerous pathogen research with a Chinese major general. That couple has vanished. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… /6
Elaine Dewar spot on about DRASTIC: It did not speak well for the independence and objectivity of establishment science publications like Nature, The Lancet, and even Science that most of this important new information had not been published by them. disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… /7
Elaine Dewar is mostly dismissive of science writers because they explain science but don't investigate. However, she praises @rowanjacobsen and Newsweek, @alisonannyoung and Nicholas Wade in @BulletinAtomic FYI: @meckdevil
disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… /8
One thing Dewar uncovers is that China pays researchers huge sums to publish in Nature. She says this financial incentive has likely has led to many errors and problems in publishing today. @MicrobiomDigest

ELAINE DEWAR: @DisInfoChron INTERVIEW disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/a-candid-con… /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul D. Thacker

Paul D. Thacker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thackerpd

13 Feb
Read my @DisInfoChron interview w/ Harvard Professor Naomi Oreskes, who exposed the scientists who engaged in tobacco & #climatedenial

NAOMI ORESKES: DICHRON INTERVIEW disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/naomi-oreske…. /1
@DisInfoChron We discuss @JunkScience who I caught in the @industrydocs flacking for tobacco, while he was a science columnist at Fox News disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/naomi-oreske…
Milloy, you still taking tobacco money?! /2
@DisInfoChron @JunkScience @industrydocs Dr. Fred Seitz was President of Rockefeller University and was head National Academies of Science. He was also a tobacco consultant and climate denialist.
disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/naomi-oreske…
Here's tobacco consultants discussed how elderly he was in early 1989. /3
Read 5 tweets
7 Aug 20
@VivaLaChang @LizBorkowski @thatshaycrayy It's way past time for @UCSUSA & @kenkimmell to get their act together.

Some years back, @cgseife & I identified serious program problems w/ them attacking #FOIA

Why it’s OK for taxpayers to ‘snoop’ on scientists latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/… /1
@VivaLaChang @LizBorkowski @thatshaycrayy @UCSUSA @kenkimmell @cgseife The response by @UCSUSA & @halpsci was to start lying about us and transparency activists. I was then invited to write about this for the NY Times

Scientists, Give Up Your Emails nytimes.com/2016/01/10/opi… /2
@VivaLaChang @LizBorkowski @thatshaycrayy @UCSUSA @kenkimmell @cgseife @halpsci Instead of learning from this, @halpsci doubled down, and launched some ridiculous anti-#FOIA bill in California, which @cgseife wrote about.

Scientists have #MeToo issues too. Don't exempt them
latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/… /3
Read 6 tweets
6 Sep 19
1/4 Researcher Selim Cetiner of @sabanciu in Turkey sure seems flipped out that @GMWatch ran this clip by @corinnelepage defending Seralini's research finding harm from GMO corn.

Cetiner complains it undermines his discussions w/ reporters.

Email here: documentcloud.org/documents/6382…
@sabanciu @GMWatch @corinnelepage 2/4 Selim Cetiner email goes to the AgBioChatter list for help in attack @corinnelepage who defended the Seralini study finding harm from #GMO corn.

See LePage piece posted at @GMWatch in English, here: gmwatch.org/en/latest-list…

At the time, LePage was MEP repping 450 million
@sabanciu @GMWatch @corinnelepage 3/4 Like magic, Selim Cetiner email to AgBioChatter is forwarded to . . . . #Monsanto

SURPRISE!!!

#Monsanto execs then get to work, apparently to hand off #GMO info to Cetiner so he can undermine LePage.

"This is urgent," Sachs writes.

documentcloud.org/documents/6382…
#ThirdParty
Read 6 tweets
6 Feb 19
If you ever worried that science was being warped by corporate interests, this backpedal by AAAS in giving an award to pesticide researcher should lay that to rest.

Answer seems to be "yes."

@dannyhakim @EricLiptonNYT @lizabio @cgseife @sfoucart @JeanneLenzer1 @mara
@fastlerner
@dannyhakim @EricLiptonNYT @lizabio @cgseife @sfoucart @JeanneLenzer1 @mara @fastlerner Nina Federoff is the former President of AAAS. She is now an advisor to a law firm that lobbies for the agrochemical industry and a critic of #GMO reporting "Flacking for GMOs: How the Biotech Industry Cultivates Positive Media—and Discourages Criticism" progressive.org/magazine/how-t…
@dannyhakim @EricLiptonNYT @lizabio @cgseife @sfoucart @JeanneLenzer1 @mara @fastlerner Nina Federoff also appeared at the release of the "junk science" book by the American Council on Science and Health, a front group for the chemical industry and #Monsanto acsh.org/news/2017/06/2…
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan 19
1/6 Emails shows #Monsanto orchestrated a behind the scenes retraction of Seralini's paper on #GMOs.

David Saltimiras w/ #Monsanto started "the last rites of Seralini" with an email to Sir Colin Berry.

@NaomiOreskes @sejorg @TimothyAWise @industrydocs @sfoucart @fastlerner
@NaomiOreskes @sejorg @TimothyAWise @industrydocs @sfoucart @fastlerner 2/6 The campaign to get the paper retracted ran for months. Saltimiras then writes his #Monsanto colleagues that the journal editor can't do anything w/ blog and web postings and needs "formal letters to the Editor."

Guess what Monsanto did? Wild guess....
@NaomiOreskes @sejorg @TimothyAWise @industrydocs @sfoucart @fastlerner 3/6 BTW, let's pause for a moment to see how the "science media" covered this retraction.

Story at NBC news gives you a taste of the pile on against Seralini w/o any mention that this was a corporate orchestrated hit on a scientist. nbcnews.com/science/journa…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(