Share this page!

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture
Twitter logo
23 Nov, 5 tweets, 3 min read
I sat on this for a day before publishing.

The letter from 86 NGOs misrepresents what’s happening in the WTO so badly that perhaps it’s better to just ignore it.

But it is sponsored by some big names (@amnesty, @Oxfam) and is attracting attention.

1/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…
What did the letter get wrong?

Apart from the absurd hyperbole:

1. The two strands of WTO work on trade and the pandemic are not mutually exclusive. The letter says ditch one in favour of the other. That’s not what most developing countries want

2/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…
2. Those 2 strands (compiling views on trade issues; waiving intellectual property rules) are not equivalent

One is about compiling views (easier). The other is rule-making, affecting legal rights and obligations (much more difficult)

3/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…
3. The part on #WTOreform follows the line of the India-South Africa paper slamming plurilaterals (talks among part of the membership), increasingly a minority view in the WTO.

Over 140 members are participating in plurilaterals

4/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…
The part on #WTOreform also omits completely anything on dispute settlement.

Do the 80+ NGOs, including @amnesty and @Oxfam really think reforming WTO dispute settlement is irrelevant?

Did they read the letter before signing it?

5/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Peter Ungphakorn

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CoppetainPU

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture
24 Nov
THIS SUNDAY—ANOTHER 🇨🇭 vote

4th of the year. 3 issues:

1. Covid-19 law (referendum)
2. Better pay and conditions for nurses (initiative)
3. Federal judges to be chosen by drawing lots (initiative)

The Swiss broadcaster’s final opinion poll is out

1/8 swissinfo.ch/eng/covid-cert…
1. The vote on the Covid law is a proper 🇨🇭 #referendum (law or constitutional change referred to a public vote)

This is the 2nd vote on the law. The first was in June

It’s about a range of powers but the Covid certificate is the focus of attention

2/8 swissinfo.ch/eng/fate-of-co…
What is a 🇨🇭 referendum?

A nationwide vote called to challenge legislation already approved by parliament:

• if 50,000 signatures collected within 100-day deadline
• mandatory for constitutional amendments or major international agreements.

3/8 swissinfo.ch/eng/direct-dem…
Read 8 tweets
Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture
21 Nov
We can tell the tension's rising when weird stories like this appear

Fact: 🇳🇿 Amb David Walker has been working on trade and COVID-19 issues but *not* on the #TRIPSwaiver

Why? Because that is done in the TRIPS Council by chair 🇳🇴 Amb Dagfinn Sørli

1/3 thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/…
This ⬇️ is the latest on the intellectual property (TRIPS) waiver in the TRIPS Council

WTO members are deadlocked on the waiver. No consensus in sight

So the question is: if agreement on this is not possible, should all other work be blocked too?

2/3 wto.org/english/news_e…
More specifically should all other WTO work on COVID-19 and trade, for the Ministerial Conference, be blocked?

The latest from the General Council on these issues: wto.org/english/news_e…

The decision to set up the Walker discussions: wto.org/english/news_e…

3/3
Read 4 tweets
Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture
19 Nov
WTO AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS

A bit behind on this one. But despite lots of meetings nothing much seems to have changed.

Info from trade sources:

Chair @GloriaAbrahamP told ambassadors on Monday she will circulate a revised draft (first: July 29)

1/8 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/07/30/agr…
She said huge gaps remain on several issues:

1. Trade-distorting domestic support—go for a numerical target or try to agree on words; a timetable for reducing the support; special treatment for developing countries.

Forget market access.

Draft: tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2-domestic-sup…

2/8
2. Improving information shared among the membership (notifications)—eg, on shipments en route; notifying export restrictions in advance.

This is seen as something that could be delivered at the Ministerial Conference, but differences remain.

Draft: tradebetablog.wordpress.com/9-transparency…

3/8
Read 8 tweets
Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture
16 Nov
Oh dear. Trade geekery needs an upgrade 😉

A whopping 86% of you GOT THIS WRONG!

The correct answer is … 154

That’s all 164 @wto members EXCEPT the 10 that have not ratified the agreement.

Why? Does it matter?

Maybe.

Cc: @craigaatkinson @maheenhassan3 @AllieRenison

1/11
The #TradeFacilitationAgreement is multilateral, the whole WTO membership (164) agreeing by consensus.

But to add it in the WTO’s rule book, WTO members had to insert it in the package of agreements—by amending Annex 1 of the WTO Agreement.

2/11 wto.org/english/docs_e…
So rules on amendments apply—WTO Agreement, Art.10, Par.3:

“Amendments … shall take effect for the Members that have accepted them upon acceptance by two thirds of the Members and thereafter for each other Member upon acceptance by it.”

3/11 wto.org/english/docs_e…
Read 12 tweets
Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture
12 Nov
18 days until the WTO Ministerial Conference starts, a slew of new/revised drafts have arrived.

1. TRANSPARENCY IN ROUTINE WTO WORK—notifications and discussion in the committees.

A proposed General Council decision but it comes under “WTO reform”

1/7 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
The proposal: improve transparency to help the system work better

New—Iceland, Paraguay now in; minor changes

Consensus seems unlikely for now. China, India, most developing countries are not on board, many complaining they are already over-burdened

2/7 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S…
If ministers agree to set up a working group to look at #WTOreform, then this would be part of the discussion.

The EU has proposed setting one up.

USTR @AmbassadorTai has called for discussions at the ministerial conference and after

3/7 insidetrade.com/share/172631
Read 7 tweets
Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture
5 Nov
Thump!

A plain package has landed on my doorstep.

Inside I find …

1/n
… I find … the secret text of the “Trade and environmental sustainability structured discussions (#TESSD)”

1/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/tessd-october-…
What does it say?

1. The statement will only be issued by some members (about two thirds of the membership are not on board, although China and the US are reported to have joined the EU, Canada, Japan and others but not Brazil, India, SAfrica, etc

2/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/05/wto…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @CoppetainPU has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @CoppetainPU!

Read all threads by @CoppetainPU

:(