Thoughts: Yes, this variant has a high # of spike mutations, & a few known to cause changes. But, we've seen previous variants that looked worrying & never took off. We should watch & wait for more data to estimate how concerning this is.
As a catch-up for those who haven't seen said headlines, I think this @guardian article on it gives a fair summary, with some level-headed quotes from scientists. theguardian.com/world/2021/nov…
We got some additional information this afternoon from a press conference with @Tuliodna & @rjlessells. You can watch it below. A brief touch on some of the new information.
- There are more cases detected now, & over 80 with genomes
- Some mutations in spike mean the variant can be detected through S-gene dropout by PCR
- Likely cases have been detected in provinces outside of Gauteng, where originally detected
You might remember 'S-drop-out' (also called SGTF) from other variants, particularly Alpha. This means that some PCR tests fail to detect one of their targets (they use more than 1, so the test doesn't fail overall), which can be used to quickly ID the variant.
This means even in areas where there aren't sequences, you have a proxy by which you can track the variant. Here, we can see S-drop-out across provinces in SA, with a recent increase noticeable for many of them.
This implies B.1.1.529 may be more widespread than 1st thought in SA
What do we know about the mutations we see in this variant? We know about some of them from previous variants & prev studies. However, important to keep in mind that mutations often work together - we can't perfectly predict what this combination may mean. Wait for lab work.
South Africa has had fairly low case numbers recently, but there's a very recent spike. This may be associated with the new B.1.1.529 variant.
Important thing to keep in mind:
- We cannot perfectly predict virus behaviour from mutations. Even lab work doesn't perfectly mirror what happens in complex, whole-body real-life. Other, alarming variants have failed to spread very far in the past. We need more data.
Important thing to keep in mind:
- SA has recently had relatively low cases - this may leave a void which a new variant can spread into more easily - it likely hasn't had to compete with Delta. In other places, where Delta rages, it may not be as fit.
Important thing to keep in mind:
- We don't know what other factors may be helping spread, for example, an event or recent behaviour change
- SA has a low vax rate - 28% 1dose, 24% 2dose. Immune evasion may not be needed to spread. Fitness could differ in higher-vax countries.
The additional information today helps us: we can track this variant with PCR tests, & we know how to look for it. We can step up monitoring, & we should.
However, what fitness advantage(s) it may have are still unclear, esp outside of initial spread. More data needed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Note that data is still incoming! I currently only have the first sequences detected & will update as soon as I have additional sequences.
1/4
The 21K (B.1.1.529) page offers some information about some of the observed mutations - but I'd welcome contributions to link to more research!
On the right you can see the defining mutations - note that nonsynonymous mutations aren't yet available - I'll add them soon.
2/4
You can also see 21K (B.1.1.529) on the Shared Mutations page (& too big to screenshot!) to compare what Spike mutations we also see in other variants.
"What's the situation in Europe?"
Yes - cases are rising in many places 📈
But it's difficult to talk about 'Europe' 🌍 as one entity right now: as the pandemic continues, things are getting more heterogeneous. 📊
*What one country can manage, may not be true for another*
1/16
First, we have to look both at absolute case numbers & change in case numbers - some places with high cases may see a decrease but remain high 📉, others with lower numbers might be seeing a concerning sharp increase 📈
"Thing is, we have a chance to build office work from the ground up: to re-evaluate the old 9-to-5, to relocate city centre offices, to let people work tight 4-day weeks, to realise that working smart is better than the old-fashioned idea of working hard"
From chatting to people, I think the main reason those high up want people to come back to the office is simple: control.
Even when productivity metrics indicate all is well, bosses don't trust employees & like to be able to physically check on them. Not related to actual output.
I'd be super curious in any survey difference between how much superiors miss "stopping by to chat" vs how much their employees feel similarly.
Headlines like the one circulating about India always need to be taken cautiously: until we have sequence data, speculation about a new variant or new mutations is entirely that - speculation.
But let's dig into what's being reported right now about 40,000 breakthroughs...
Headlines are saying things like "40,000 breakthrough COVID cases". But what does breakthrough mean here? Most generally, at least in Western media, this is used to refer to infections in fully-vaccinated (commonly 2-dose) people.
2/N
However, 1 site reporting the 40,000 defines this as "people contracting the disease a second time or fully vaccinated".
Another implies this is infection after 1 or 2 doses.
Today, my best birthday present is being fully vaccinated! 🎂
But so many still aren't - & the pandemic has wrecked havoc on routine vaccinations too.
Donate to @gavi, @UNICEF or others & I'll match up to $500! Send your receipt to vaccine_donations@protonmail.com & plz RT!
1/
As well as desperately requiring stronger action towards more equitable #COVID19 vaccination, the pandemic has meant so many children weren't able to get basic vaccines.
This could add unnecessarily to the already too-large burden of the pandemic.