Share this page!

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture
Twitter logo
26 Nov, 5 tweets, 3 min read
It should be written as "Hindutva", not "Hindustava".

What is "your" minister? Get some sanity when you wish to deal with history.
Ambedkar saw "CONGRESS & GANDHI" as root supporter of Untouchability that is why wrote the book framing them & not RSS, HM or Savarkar.
Well @lovekeshchandra , yes Ambedkar chose to walk in "Buddha Panth" but his reason as political person were GANDHI & CONGRESS. They failed to do anything for Dalits, rather they intensified problems.

He put it openly in his book.
You keep blaming Hindutva & Savarkar @lovekeshchandra for untoucability. While Gandhi kept talking lofty he wanted a Dalit to remain Shudra by profession forever Savarkar was practically making things happen through intercaste dining, patitpawan mandir.
In fact, @lovekeshchandra , Ambedkar went to praise Savarkar that "you are the only person who has understood how the caste based discrimination can be removed."

But you will have beef only with Hindutva. Go read amazon.in/What-Congress-…
and then @lovekeshchandra read this "Free Hindustan Constitution" drafted by Hindu Mahasabaha and tell me how discriminatory it is.

Lunatic thoughts must be replaced by a well informed opinion base.

Read Lovekesh read and come back.
dspace.gipe.ac.in/xmlui/bitstrea…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aabhas24

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture
3 Nov
Absolutely bunkum @thewire_in

Jha ji cites, Romila Thapar & Shokoohy to claim that Arabs defended Somnath.

Truth is that the primary source , Al-Biruni doesn’t talks about such incidence.

Both Thapar & Shokoohy have just fabricated a story.

I dare any historian to prove it
Dear @thewire_in , in this review of of Romila Thapar’s
"Somanatha, The Many Voices of a History" #MeenakshiJain ji destroys the propaganda so well.

The same book is one of the source of Prem Shankar Jha in this non-scholarly article.
web.archive.org/web/2014121804…
Interestingly, author Jha, claims in the article that Kathak & Khayal Gayaki were born in period of Amir Khusraw.

What a joke.
The roots of Kathak is found in "Natya Shastra". Even the conservative Marxist historians place this text 3-4 centuries before so called birth of Jesus
Read 16 tweets
Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture
3 Oct
The root of racism is in Christian Theology. Black people according to them were beasts & hence deserved to made slave.

As per the Christian Identity theory, Adam and Eve were only the ancestors of white people.
hey say that before, Adam & Eve lived non-Caucasian races which are identified as "beasts of the field"(Genesis 1:25).

As precedent, the 'beasts'which wore sackcloth & cried unto God (Jonah 3:8) are identified as black races.
Now, interestingly to support this, Christians direct us to the Hebrew etymology of the word 'Adam' which is = 'be ruddy, red, to show blood'.

James Strong's Hebrew Dictionary talks about it.
Read 5 tweets
Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture
26 Sep
1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within you @dhume

Once, it was considered that Greece was "mother of democracy". But recent discoveries have contested

If not all, "Democracy" seems to have certainly originated first in India as/ latest researches.

Read
2/n We came across the Rakhigarhi Excavations.

It took the whole world by shock for the revelations it brought.

It happened to be a civilization (6.5+2.0) KY BP*

*Thousand years before present
3/n Here as stated by Dr Shinde, the Panchayat found on the site is around 5.5 KYBP.

We do not find any evidence of Monarchical Set-Up across any Indus Saraswati Civilization belt. tribuneindia.com/news/archive/f…
Read 26 tweets
Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture
24 Sep
SR Goel also said:

"The Arya Samaj was the first Hindu movement to take up a bold stand in this context. Maharshi Dayanand himself had showed up Muhammad for the sort of man he was."

in his book, "Freedom of expression: Secular theocracy versus liberal democracy."
SR Goel writes, "He (Dayanand) made a positive contribution when he pointed out that India had inherited a spirituality and a culture which were not only indigenous but also intrinsically superior to the imported creeds and cultures...
...He encouraged and enabled his people to reawaken to their own inner sources of strength, and hold their heads high in the face of foreign invaders. He was the first to use the terms Swadeshi and Swarajya.
Read 12 tweets
Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture
24 Sep
There was a period, when every Hindu Organisations including Ramkrishna Mission, Hindu Mahasabha, Arya Samaj spoke of Shuddhi (re-converting to Hindu Fold) & wanted Hindus to give away shackles of caste for same.

Instead of blaming them as reformist & Christian stooges+
One need to understand Politics, situation of that period.

Why all were on same page?

Recently we came across a case where a BJP’s MLA’s mother converted to Christianity.+
A thing was observed that a child deemed to be Shudra by birth ran into the Mandir & heavy fine was imposed (₹25,000).

It is high time to realise that such incidence don’t lead to conversion.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubballi/…
Read 7 tweets
Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture
19 Sep
Well let me simplify my stand.

1) There is no historic evidence for Euclid

2) Elements was actually a work of empirical proofs & not deductive (1st proposition itself is proof of two arcs by empirical method)
3)Post Crusades (after 7 centuries), Church brought logic in play & declared that metaphysical Mathematics began with Euclid, although they couldn't notice that it was actually dealing with empirical proofs.

4)It became an error for metaphysics of church
but went on being unnoticed till 19th century.

5) It was admitted that other empirical proofs (such as the proof of Proposition 4 or the side-angle-side theorem) are essential to the proof of the “Pythagorean” theorem in the Elements.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @Aabhas24 has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @Aabhas24!

Read all threads by @Aabhas24

:(