1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within you @dhume

Once, it was considered that Greece was "mother of democracy". But recent discoveries have contested

If not all, "Democracy" seems to have certainly originated first in India as/ latest researches.

Read
2/n We came across the Rakhigarhi Excavations.

It took the whole world by shock for the revelations it brought.

It happened to be a civilization (6.5+2.0) KY BP*

*Thousand years before present
3/n Here as stated by Dr Shinde, the Panchayat found on the site is around 5.5 KYBP.

We do not find any evidence of Monarchical Set-Up across any Indus Saraswati Civilization belt. tribuneindia.com/news/archive/f…
4/n Now, it becomes very interesting to observe that even though it was a notion that Greeks gave democracy to world.

Diodorus who is said to have visited India, around 2 centuries after Alexander talks that high level democracy of Indians was peculiar to Greeks (Diodorus 2.39)
5/n It was peculiar as Diodorous noted "No Slavery."

Slavery was very much predominant in West. In fact, Plato defines Mathematics with notion of "Slave's Soul." @dhume aware of it?

So how can a society with Slaves be considered "DEMOCRATIC"?
6/n Ok @dhume , now what did democracy meant to Greeks, rather Athens?

Is it not the common notion that it originated in Athens around 2.5 KYBP?

Of course, we have no clue that how exactly the discovered "Panchayat" of Rakhigarhi was operating 5.5 KYBP, but we know of Athens.
7/n In the Athenian democracy around 70% of adult population (foreign origin, slaves and women) didn't had right to participate in Legislation & Executive Bills.

Did you know this @dhume ?

Look at this source: Athenian Democracy by John Thorle, I have put pg 74
8/n In case if one is getting confused with status of women as mentioned by Plato in Republic, one need to know that Plato's ideal state wasn't a democracy.

And in Athenian Democracy, men believed women's intelligence to be same as that of animals & barbarians.
9/n Well @dhume ji, there are various reasons why with current researches, India certainly needs to be seen as place to have seen "Democracy" much earlier than West.

I showed you above how discriminatory was Athenian Democracy for Slavery unlike India.
10/n Now let me let you know a bit about proto-democracies which have in place in records.

We have evidences of "Governing by assembly" in ancient Phoenicians. One such evidence is the story an Egyptian trader who traveled north to the Phoenician around 3.1 kybp.

Source below
11/n Now we also hear about "Primitive Democracy" pre-Babylonian Mesopotamia. One person to strongly vouch for it was Thorkild Jacobsen.

So what was primitive democracy?

According to Jacobsen, it was as below:
12/n "A government wherein ultimate power rests with the mass of non-slave male citizens. Although the various functions of government are as yet little specialized & the power structure is loose."

Jacobsen explains in his book, "Primitive Democracy in Ancient Mesopotamia" that
13/n The kings like Gilgamesh were devoid of autocratic power like how Mesopotamian rulers wielded in later period. Major city-states functioned with councils of non-slave men bearing arm. They were consulted on all major issues such as war.
14/n But is Mesopotamia really fit enough to be considered as “democracy” ~4kybp?

Many scholars are against calling it"democracy".

According to Bailkey this Gilgamesh & other situations, reflect a power struggle between primitive monarchy and Noblemen.
15/n Scholars see case of Mesopotamia as a struggle where common men appear more like pawn than sovereign authority.

& the Jacobsen too accepts that the peculiar evidence let us see Mesopotamian democracy = primitive oligarchy.
16/n It all has began after @narendramodi ji, spoke of India being "Mother of Democracy," let me focus completely on "Bharat" exclusively from here.

In the quoted tweet, I proved of Panchayat in India 5.5kybp & in above tweets spoke of Proto Democracies.
17/n Before I move onto how our democracy worked, I wish to pick two terms "gana" & "Sangha".

Gana=The representative members of clans

It finds mention in RigVeda 3.26.6
It reads:
"...Vrātam Vrātam gaṇam gaṇam..."
18/n Then we find, Pāṇini talking about it:

"Sanghoddhau gaṇa praśansayo..."
The Nāradasmṛti talks about the rule of "Ganatantra".

Bhishma explains about "Ganas" and their policies in Shanti Parva.
19/n We are informed about Ganas from great Sangam Literature.

Silappatikaram by Ilango Adigal talks about the offering for eighteen kind of Ganas.

You may read here
books.google.co.in/books?id=STbMz…
20/n Mahabagga, a Buddha Dharma text tells us:

"Gaṇa pūrkovā bhavissāmīti"

Hence we know that an office bearer used to see the number of ganas and their koram in the Rajasabha.

Pali-pitaka’, Majjhamnikaya, mahabagga, Avadana shataka talk about ganas and sanghas extensively.
21/n We must be informed that Gaṇas during Buddha's period were assemblies of the Sanghas.

The democratic republics Gaṇa-rājyas=rule of the assembly.

It is identical to demo-kratia .

Bhārata Gaṇarājya = The Republic of India
22/n As per the Kalchakra tradition Buddha would have lived around 2.9 kybp.

And even the most conservative, Marxist Historians place him 2.6 kybp, and that is when demo-kratia to came.
23/n So yes, these terms exists in our texts from ages.

But we will do a great disservice the stream of research if we don't look for empirical evidences too for the existence of Democracy in Ancient India a lot before the Western World.
24/n Now, let me summarize, what I have established so far:

a)Athenian Democracy(2.6 kybp)is considered the origin by conservative thought just based on Textual Evidences,even though Slavery existed & Slaves+Female were not part of System.Term too comes from here.
25/n b)Mesopotamia gives very crude idea which people call as "Democracy" (around 4 kybp)

c)India has ideas about Democracy in texts in lot earlier ages than both Greece & Mesopotamia (refer Rig Veda, Gana & Sangha).
26/n d)The existence of Panchayat in Rakhigarhi (5.5Kybp) is an empirical evidence that Democracy existed in Indus Saraswati Civilization.

Now from 27/n onward I'll deal with Janapads & Mahajanpads with empirical evidences too.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aabhas24

24 Sep
SR Goel also said:

"The Arya Samaj was the first Hindu movement to take up a bold stand in this context. Maharshi Dayanand himself had showed up Muhammad for the sort of man he was."

in his book, "Freedom of expression: Secular theocracy versus liberal democracy."
SR Goel writes, "He (Dayanand) made a positive contribution when he pointed out that India had inherited a spirituality and a culture which were not only indigenous but also intrinsically superior to the imported creeds and cultures...
...He encouraged and enabled his people to reawaken to their own inner sources of strength, and hold their heads high in the face of foreign invaders. He was the first to use the terms Swadeshi and Swarajya.
Read 12 tweets
24 Sep
There was a period, when every Hindu Organisations including Ramkrishna Mission, Hindu Mahasabha, Arya Samaj spoke of Shuddhi (re-converting to Hindu Fold) & wanted Hindus to give away shackles of caste for same.

Instead of blaming them as reformist & Christian stooges+
One need to understand Politics, situation of that period.

Why all were on same page?

Recently we came across a case where a BJP’s MLA’s mother converted to Christianity.+
A thing was observed that a child deemed to be Shudra by birth ran into the Mandir & heavy fine was imposed (₹25,000).

It is high time to realise that such incidence don’t lead to conversion.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hubballi/…
Read 7 tweets
19 Sep
Well let me simplify my stand.

1) There is no historic evidence for Euclid

2) Elements was actually a work of empirical proofs & not deductive (1st proposition itself is proof of two arcs by empirical method)
3)Post Crusades (after 7 centuries), Church brought logic in play & declared that metaphysical Mathematics began with Euclid, although they couldn't notice that it was actually dealing with empirical proofs.

4)It became an error for metaphysics of church
but went on being unnoticed till 19th century.

5) It was admitted that other empirical proofs (such as the proof of Proposition 4 or the side-angle-side theorem) are essential to the proof of the “Pythagorean” theorem in the Elements.
Read 6 tweets
12 Sep
Today, b'coz of our understanding of particular context, time, history wrt affiliations,may end up setting differences with Hindutva.

But get in drilled in mind, today they are attacking word "Hindutva",tomorrow they will do same to"Hinduism" too.

They have problem with Hindus.
They have issues with exactly that parts of Hinduism, that touched few parts of our history aided by British misinterpretations.

You claim that preserving "Jati System" would preserve "Hinduism", but there they are hitting you exactly there in name of Hindutva.
It is high time that we get over our obsession with seeing superiority as prescribed by Sampradaya that we subscribe too.

The merger of Sampradayas for common cause, with own ideas being limited to not superseding others should be the idea.
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep
Reformation isn’t needed in process that has “evolution.”

Sanatana Dharma, is the address to Nature, which evolves everyday.

The more beings are born, more she evolves. Every extra breathing has a new carbon-footprint.
Reformation comes in play where things are actually “distorted.”

Our Shastras don’t have contradictions, but evidence of “evolution” which was always accepted by our Acharyas.
While Christians after reformation, got to be known as Protestant, our Shastras despite evolutions kept being accepted by Hindus. There contradictions didn’t being new sect each time.

Dharma is like water, for it is Santana.
Read 4 tweets
11 Sep
Well @TheDeshBhakt ,"Hindutva"isn't only "Hindu Nationalism"as claimed by @devduttmyth, I must tell u that when Savarkar took it up in that form decades after it being coined (1892),it saved nation from the backlash of political Islam which could have resulted in Pakistan ++++
Hindutva is that force @TheDeshBhakt which is making us recognize our past, good and bad which had got crushed by the gang of Brown Sahibs.

Would @devduttmyth, agree with @AudreyTruschke who says that what "Nirbhaya" had to face is core of Hindus, citing Draupadi?
And @AudreyTruschke is one of the speakers and core behind the #DismantlingGlobalHindutva conference.

While she criticizes and abuses Hindu Sahstras day & night, she happens to be AUrangzeb fan girl, who was fan of sex slavery.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(