1. Looks like the puppet masters are losing hope in INC as it is today, and they are willing to load up TMC instead.
The sudden money rush to buy manpower in disparate states cannot be explained otherwise.
2. Also shows the masters are not hopeful of AAP
3. RaGa and PriGa are loaded and reloaded and they have failed spectacularly.
Evidence - exit of close ties of RaGa from INC to join TMC and Aditi's entry into BJP - looks like check for PriGa.
4. Distinct absence of 'Third Front' narrative and a united Modi Hate Band despite five state elections - no mahaghatbandhan talks -
instead focusing on backroom orchestrations through Prashant Kishore Pandey.
5. Looks like the plot is a trial - like AAP. Mamta's age and willingness of non-hero oriented potential new cadres is challenge to this model.
Possible this is to allow PriGa or RaGa to take a step back and reorganise their games. We will know more towards 2024.
6. INC cannot be written off freely - they still sit on a heavy cashbox - hence the family's leech like attachment to the leadership.
It will be interesting to see if INC will partner with TMC post losing most of the states after the 22 Assembly elections.
7. Fraudster INC leaders will find a way to siphon out their corpus. The fight has already begun with G-23 and will intensify towards 2024 unless compromises made.
8. If at all Manish Tiwari leaves INC, my speculation is that he will join Captain.
But if he joins TMC instead, then that will be a clear telltale. But as said, G-23 have their eyes on INC's cash box. They have no better intention for India.
9. Subramaniam Swamy's position with Mamta may not just be about his RS seat,
he can be as helpful to Mamta as she is to him. He is born into the power corridors of Delhi and has, in the past amply proved his ability to make or break governments and parties.
Mamta needs that if she is any serious about eyeing Modi's chair.
10. Amidst all this, is @narendramodi 's sane thoughts on the constitution and our democracy today.
He spoke of Kartavya instead of power which indicates he might think of breaking and rebuilding the current political system which runs more on authority than responsibilities.
11. BJP thinks long into the future and works today for it. Modi and Shah knew 20 years before 2014 of Modi becoming PM. They are well aware of the course correction with INC.
It's evident from the intense focus they have on each state even if there are no elections there.
Overall, the wind is changing in the political landscape of India.
Not Modi opposition, but a new hero might be a trick up their sleeve over the next decade or so. Some changes are organic, some are grafted.
My view is that even in 2029, BJP will remain stronger than ever.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The competitive game India has been able to play in recent times gives hope not only to our own future, but also to countries that look upon India as a friend, philosopher and guide.
Keeping our civilisational integrity in the world driven by consumerism; and preserving India’s long legacy of being the Culture Guru of the world is a challenge India can only tide over with careful planning beyond the current geopolitics.
• An inherently proud generation to take on the world.
Age and skills do not bring home the demographic dividends. A national pride is needed.
How India can achieve this in the face of manipulative social engineering is a clear challenge for us.
Making Ajit Doval the National Security Advisor was a much-anticipated move.
However, little did the world expect that a country like India would have the craft and dare to define its own terms while
it’s still a developing country.
Narendra Modi’s new style of leadership powered by Subramaniam Jaishankar’s diplomatic orchestrations and Doval’s formidable combination of master strategy and meticulous footwork enabled India to wield a commanding position in the
emerging multi-polar world.
Modi’s swearing in ceremony asserted India’s lead role in the SAARC countries, but it was the Paris summit on climate change that displayed India’s changing geopolitics in the world arena.
It was obvious from the declaration of ‘climate justice’ by
A world order but in India’s terms: emerging Indian geopolitics - Sreevidya Balasubramaniam
In this thread, I unpack @narendramodi Ji's geopolitics from an outside perspective. To show contrast, I am giving a brief of the past diplomacy as part 1.
India’s past foreign policy
Non-alignment was a foreign policy instrument India followed since her independence.
It sat on a pile of post-war assumptions of the emerging world order. Promoting peace made the core of India’s foreign policy as a pre-condition to development.
However, this policy had long become redundant in the face of a ballooning war economy globally.
Like many domestic policies post-independence, non-alignment was also strongly influenced by the socialist ideas in support of the Soviet Union in the protracted bipolar power-
their so called opposition is shamefully struggling to figure out who their leader today is.
This being the context, our intellectuals start advising how we don’t have a robust ‘opposition’ and the importance of having an opposition.
This is the biggest collective delusion.
If judiciary can work without ideology and opposition, then why can’t the Legislature and Executive work without a political process which costs a fortune, forcing parties to be at war constantly?
What is ideology? Why should ideology lead a group of people?