Important article: says WHO should treat Big Food like Big tobacco, w/ "critical measures to firewall industry’s profit-making interests from influencing policymaking for the health and wellbeing of public and to hold industry liable for harms caused" 1/ link.springer.com/article/10.105…
Cites FAO (Food & Ag Org), multinational group that invited in junk food multinationals as 'stakeholders.' This can easily lead to corporate agendas taking over.
Eg. a partnership between FAO and CropLife International, an international pesticide association 2/
FAO partnership with pesticide group "runs counter to FAO’s own programmes and codes of conduct that are seeking to minimize the harms of chemical pesticide use worldwide...Moreover, such a partnership may transform FAO into a business broker for CropLife member companies" 3/
Corporations have invaded spaces meant to protect human rights, the public health.
"Having businesses ‘at the table’ or as ‘stakeholders’ contributes to the weakening of standards."
Treat Big Food like Big Tobacco, w/ same restraints. Human rights are not their agenda.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm trying to figure how how this 'study'--which was a presentation by a Harvard post-doc at a @American_Heart conference, not peer-reviewed--got reported by @NBCNews, @CNN and others. No link provided even to the presentation. Link, anyone? 1/ nbcnews.com/health/health-…
The concl. that sat fats are linked to stroke is contradicted by virtually all other similar studies which have consistently found that more sat fat is assoc. w/ LOWER risk from stroke. This includes the largest such study in the world, called PURE: thelancet.com/article/S0140-…
2/
Super important to consider @CoryBooker@SenateAgDems@SenateAgGOP that our most important govt policy is not evidence-based and does not improve health. Very likely causes harm. This is our government's current policy for prevention and the basis of all federal nutrition prog.
When you talk about disease prevention, this is the government's top policy. It's been followed, yet Americans are not getting healthier.
Why? Bc the advice could not be shown--even in clinical trials--to produce good health. Low-fat diet was shown to INC. risk of heart disease.
These were large clinical trials on >50K people.
So what works to actually swivel diet-related diseases into reverse? Either a permanent starvation diet (not viable) or a diet that restricts all sugars, including foods that turn to sugar upon digestion (grains, fruits).
A recent survey found 42% of adults gained weight during the pandemic: avg. of 29 lbs. 1 in 10 gained 50-plus lbs. Weight gain increases risk of T2 diabetes and other diseases...and also, to poor outcomes for #Covid19 1/ apa.org/news/press/rel…
h/t to @chriskresser for this info
Greatest predictor of hospitalization/death from #Covid other than old-age, is obesity, high avg. blood glucose. A study in JAMA found 63.5% of hospitalizations were due to 4 major metabolic conditions: diabetes, obesity, hypertension, heart failure 2/ ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.11…
It appears there's an effort underway to 'cancel' non-establishment views on nutrition. Seems impossible, yet it's happening. Non-orthodox opinions are being suppressed in many fields-why not nutrition? Hence, a thread for @twitter@facebook@Wikipedia@youtube@instagram etc
On saturated fats, the vast majority of now ~20 review papers on this subject do NOT support continued caps on sat fats. Official guidelines lag behind (as they always have), but the science clearly no longer supports caps on these fats. List of papers: nutritioncoalition.us/saturated-fats… 2/
Most important was a paper on sat fats in the J. of Am. College of Cardiology. Authors included 4 members of previous USDA-HHS Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees, saying, basically, we got it wrong on sat fats: Data do not support continued caps 3/ sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Malnutrition among US women. "This is the stuff that keeps me up at night,” says prof. Bailey. And ability to have healthy children? “Going into reproductive age at nutrition risk can cause intergenerational effects"
Important story by @ANDREAAPETERSEN
In the US, "We live shorter, poorer lives" according to a Nat'l Academies' report. The report was called a "catalogue of horrors." Newspapers were "stunned" and "surprised." That was 2013. “As bad as things were then, they’ve only gotten worse,” says Dr. Woolf from @VCUHealth
By 2019, U.S. was 36th in the world on life expectancy at birth, behind Slovenia, Costa Rica. Recent paper found that even privileged whites fare worse on infant mortality, maternal mortality+deaths from heart attacks than avg. citizens of Norway, Denmark+other developed nations
"The troubling portrait of America’s health did not spur action to paint a better one. Two presidential administrations have ignored it, as has Congress" states this article by @undarkmag, looking back at the 2013 report undark.org/2021/02/01/ame…@XavierBecerra