Is it possible that a variant evolves that has a CFR of more than 50%, like Ebola virus (EBOV)? Although SARS-CoV-2 has nastily surprised us already so many times, I think this is unlikely.
1/7
EBOV infects inner organs and blood vessels causing diarrhea, vomiting, and severe bleedings. Transmission occurs mainly via body fluids (Blood, Vomit, Saliva, etc). Exposed to the virus-infested fluids are hospital staff and relatives caring for the sick or washing the dead
2/7
Thus, heavy symptoms are actually helping or even required by EBOV to jump from human to human.
SARS-CoV-2, by contrast, spreads mostly through the air. For transmission, the virus only needs to replicate in cells of the upper airways.
3/7
Here it is more important that apparently healthy people can walk around, contact others, and spread the virus. There are also SARS-CoV-2 hospital outbreaks caused by critically ill people, but these are less important for maintaining the transmission chain.
4/7
Unlike for EBOV, the severe symptoms of COVID-19 do not help transmission and can be considered an accident. Most likely the virulence is due to the selection of aggressively growing strains spreading in a crowd of immun-naive individuals.
5/7
The severe disease is caused by an immune-overreaction to virus particles that infect the inner organs and is not an advantage for the virus. It happens well after the peak in virus load and infectiousness. The virus just "does not care"
6/7
Therefore, I think that the differences in transmission strategies argue against the possibility that a SARS-CoV-2 variant with an EBOV-like level of virulence could evolve.
7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The complexities of a working definition for the term ‘asymptomatic’ in this disease are exemplified by an early report from Wuhan, which showed that about one-third of individuals with asymptomatic infections had lung changes that were visible on computed tomography scans
2/
...subsequently confirmed in several other studies. That is, end organ damage can ensue in individuals who were otherwise unaware of their infection.
3/
Warum sind unsere Impfquoten nicht ausreichend? Ich denke viele der Mythen, welche die Leute verunsichert haben, gehen auf den Flyer zurück, der Anfang 2021 in die Briefkästen geworfen wurde. Verantwortlich dafür sind @SHomburg und Sucharit Bhakdi
1/
Schon das Deckblatt nutzt den klassischen "ich stelle doch nur Fragen"-Trick.
Und die abgebildete Spritze, naja, die Größenrelation zu dem niedlichen Teddybär entspricht nicht direkt der Realität beim Impfen (man beachte auch: blutiges Pflaster, umgekippte Impfampulle) 2/
Los geht's mit dem Text:
Was unterschlagen wird:
Impfung: ist nur 1 Virusgen ("VirusgenE" ist also falsch)
Infektion: mindestens 10 verschiedene Virusgene 3/
"Ireland is home to one of Europe's highest vaccination rates...three-quarters of all people, having been immunized -- but it recently imposed a midnight curfew ...as it battles a growing surge in cases and hospitalizations" 1/9
"...even small pockets of unvaccinated people can drive transmission...Ireland...around a million are still not protected.
"...we have...an epidemic of the unvaccinated -- about 10% of our population over 12 is unvaccinated, and we're seeing an epidemic in those people..."
2/9
"...elderly and vulnerable people with co-morbidities can still suffer breakthrough cases, and asymptomatic, healthy people are catching and passing on the virus.
"The combination of those four or five things has meant that our hospitals are getting quite full""
3/9
Was haben denn Impfungen je für uns getan? Unglaublich viel!
Leider verschwinden die Erfolge dieser erfolgreichsten aller medizinischen Maßnahmen nur allzu schnell aus dem kollektiven Bewusstsein, und man nimmt die Abwesenheit fieser Keime als gegeben an
1/n
Wichtiges Beispiel: Pocken, eine sprichwörtliche Geisel der Menschheit.
Hier eine Beschreibung des Todes von Ludwig XV, der sich bei einem Schäferstündchen das Virus eingefangen hatte. 10 Tage später das da:
2/n
Dies und vieles was folgt sind aus:
(Sehr empfehlenswertes Buch, ca.1200 spannende Seiten plus weitere 500 Seiten Referenzen. Ich gebe 10 von 5 Sternen)
I have a totally unproven hypothesis why the australian society did not discuss much before they imposed fast and robust public health measures against SARS-CoV-2: They already had quite some bad experiences with invasive species
(Thread ends with a kid's TV series!)
1/11
Cane toads: introduced into Australia with the aim to control beetles that were destroying the sugar cane harvest (didn't work)
Cane toads (dt.: Aga Kröte) soon became a problem themselves. They are prolific eaters (not only sugar cane beetles) and their skin secretes a toxin. Not good for the local ecosystems