Ok I’ve written up some threads on the bull case and the bear case for $SPELL
Let’s talk about my personal opinion on the asset: 👇
We can talk about flawed token economics all day long, we can talk about how Daniele Sestagalli is the king of the frogs 🐸 and how WAGMI, both are unquantifiable.
Valuations are memes, and we need to understand that crypto valuations as more nuanced than equities.
To me, the value proposition of $SPELL is strong.
I’ve used it to borrow, the concept of borrowing against yield bearing tokens is revolutionary and the demand is there.
Take a look at the cauldrons: yield bearing pools are empty while token pools like $FTX and $SHIB are full.
The demand for $MIM is there and the marketing is strong. The meme is strong.
If the most interesting outcome always comes true in crypto, ‘Magic Internet Money’ will take incredible market share away from DAI and other decentralized stables.
And the narrative around centralized stables being unsafe and unsecured could come true as well: right now there’s nearly $150 billion in centralized stables, that may or may not be legitimately backed.
And token issuance schedules be damned, in my time in crypto I’ve learned to never short a meme.
If $MIM grows and people continue wanting to borrow against yield bearing assets (a no brainer), the token price will go up. Period.
You think the protocol behind a stablecoin worth $50 billion will only have a market cap of $1 billion?
No way, the market cap will grow despite emissions because the protocol will grow in value.
Having Abra and $SPELL available cross chain will help tremendously.
The average loan size for now is about $130k so no smaller players are borrowing, even though it’s very low risk leverage.
Cross chain lending opens the floodgates as no one wants to pay $300 in gas.
The question, then is how all of these dynamics affects token price. Staking helps, as you get a piece of growing revenue.
And if you believe in the lending protocol, the cross chain expansion, and increasing TVL, token price will simply go up.
As long as the protocol is growing, and quickly.
Because if the protocol isn’t growing in value, token price will drop due to inflation.
Anyways, those are my thoughts today.
I still think it’s a good deal under 2 cents and a good LT investment if you believe in $MIM growing as a stablecoin.
That’s just kind of my gut feeling.
What do you guys think? Where do you see short and long term token price going?
What signals are you waiting for to invest or to take profit?
While I sometimes ramble in Twitter threads, my newsletter discusses fundamentals, valuations, mimetics, technicals, and more, all with a data -backed approach.
Here's the universal framework I use to keep my head and make money through nasty downturns. 👇
(thread)
My strategy for investing in altcoins is holding them, not trading them.
Everyone constantly posts their short-term technical analysis, flips, and trades. This is difficult to perform reliably/over time.
A better strategy: hold high conviction alts.
Don't sell them.
Your goal is to use crypto like a venture capitalist. Explore a basket of many smaller market cap projects (on average, they perform better than blue chips).
Let them go to zero or 100x.
Only a few in your portfolio have to succeed for you to outperform.
That makes it an ineffective narrative to onboard users to crypto.
Here's a thread on how we can actually help people understand the insane value of crypto networks.
(or the story of how I finally got my dad to pick up some $ETH)
thread👇
Let's start with the most basic definition of Bitcoin:
Cryptocurrencies are:
• decentralized digital currency
• without a central bank or single administrator
• that can be sent on peer-to-peer networks without the need for intermediaries
Decentralization convinces the libertarian crowd and the privacy crowd but not the mainstream.
'Without a central bank' is attractive to the gold bugs.
Abracadabra Money's $SPELL token has TANKED over the last couple of weeks.
But maybe things are a lot more bullish than they seem...
Here's how the brand new analytics available on the Abracadabra Money Dashboard tell us we're overdue for a pump:
I think the most direct way to value $SPELL is its cash flows: it's unique in that just about every cent from borrowing activity gets paid out to stakers.
The past 6 weeks have produced an average of $2.33 mm/week. That's about $120 million in yearly revenue.
And that revenue doesn't cost anything. No marketing, no COGS, no interest expense.
Thus, we can value it more or less as pure earnings.
Below are some comps with P/Es that show how $SPELL is very undervalued. Note Maker DAO for an analogous crypto.