That makes it an ineffective narrative to onboard users to crypto.
Here's a thread on how we can actually help people understand the insane value of crypto networks.
(or the story of how I finally got my dad to pick up some $ETH)
thread👇
Let's start with the most basic definition of Bitcoin:
Cryptocurrencies are:
• decentralized digital currency
• without a central bank or single administrator
• that can be sent on peer-to-peer networks without the need for intermediaries
Decentralization convinces the libertarian crowd and the privacy crowd but not the mainstream.
'Without a central bank' is attractive to the gold bugs.
But peer-to-peer? That often gets overshadowed.
When we should really be shouting peer-to-peer from the rooftops!
It is the characteristic of crypto that's simplest to understand, and perhaps the one that adds the most value to crypto ecosystems.
Why?
Our current systems rely on intermediaries to function--literally almost all of them, unless you're directly bartering with someone.
And those intermediaries reduce friction but they take a big cut. The financial industry alone is worth over $20 trillion!
But all of that value is derived from peer to peer activity. Nearly all value created in economies, fundamentally, is the exchange of goods and services between peers.
That's the base layer on which EVERYTHING else is built.
And those intermediaries are extractive, trying to suck out profit from these peer-to-peer transactions.
But what if we owned the means of exchange? Or even better, what if it was distributed, decentralized, and peer-to-peer.
Maybe we would start with the financial system?
That's crypto.
And if we can create the financial systems from scratch, interacting without intermediaries, well wouldn't those systems be worth at least $20 trillion dollars?
All the value that was once sucked up now becomes DISTRIBUTED thanks to peer-to-peer networks.
And Bitcoin, L1s, and altcoins are the networks we use to exchange without intermediaries.
And we can own these networks, and as they become worth more to people, the value of our ownership in these networks increases as well.
And that's why specific cryptos are valuable, because they replace those intermediaries.
Instead of extracting value to a central entity, the value is now distributed amongst the owners of the network.
So the next time someone asks you why blockchain is important, or why crypto is valuable, don't start with abstract concepts like 'decentralization.'
Talk about how peer-to-peer systems allow us to reclaim the value that intermediaries have extracted for thousands of years.
THAT'S why crypto is important and valuable.
That's why decentralized protocols built on decentralized networks are important and valuable.
If you liked this thread, please check out my newsletter.
It's called Crypto Pragmatist. I write about investing in small and mid-cap cryptocurrencies.
Here's the universal framework I use to keep my head and make money through nasty downturns. 👇
(thread)
My strategy for investing in altcoins is holding them, not trading them.
Everyone constantly posts their short-term technical analysis, flips, and trades. This is difficult to perform reliably/over time.
A better strategy: hold high conviction alts.
Don't sell them.
Your goal is to use crypto like a venture capitalist. Explore a basket of many smaller market cap projects (on average, they perform better than blue chips).
Let them go to zero or 100x.
Only a few in your portfolio have to succeed for you to outperform.
Ok I’ve written up some threads on the bull case and the bear case for $SPELL
Let’s talk about my personal opinion on the asset: 👇
We can talk about flawed token economics all day long, we can talk about how Daniele Sestagalli is the king of the frogs 🐸 and how WAGMI, both are unquantifiable.
Valuations are memes, and we need to understand that crypto valuations as more nuanced than equities.
To me, the value proposition of $SPELL is strong.
I’ve used it to borrow, the concept of borrowing against yield bearing tokens is revolutionary and the demand is there.
Take a look at the cauldrons: yield bearing pools are empty while token pools like $FTX and $SHIB are full.
Abracadabra Money's $SPELL token has TANKED over the last couple of weeks.
But maybe things are a lot more bullish than they seem...
Here's how the brand new analytics available on the Abracadabra Money Dashboard tell us we're overdue for a pump:
I think the most direct way to value $SPELL is its cash flows: it's unique in that just about every cent from borrowing activity gets paid out to stakers.
The past 6 weeks have produced an average of $2.33 mm/week. That's about $120 million in yearly revenue.
And that revenue doesn't cost anything. No marketing, no COGS, no interest expense.
Thus, we can value it more or less as pure earnings.
Below are some comps with P/Es that show how $SPELL is very undervalued. Note Maker DAO for an analogous crypto.