Large unvaccinated groups and the unchecked spread of the virus around the world raise the prospect of further mutations, possibly evading today’s vaccines, that will create new waves everywhere.
Yet COVID-19 is also a forerunner of more, and possibly worse, pandemics to come. Scientists have repeatedly warned that without greatly strengthened proactive strategies, global health threats will emerge more often, spread more rapidly, and take more lives.
Together with the world’s dwindling biodiversity and climate crisis, to which they are inextricably linked, infectious disease threats represent the primary international challenge of our times.
Recognizing this new reality of a pandemic era is not fearmongering but rather prudent public policy and responsible politics.
We must organize ourselves on a whole-of-society basis within nations and rethink how we collaborate internationally to mitigate its profound consequences for livelihoods, social cohesion, and global order.
COVID-19’s only benefit has been to put the case beyond doubt. Our collective failure to heed scientific advice and invest in pandemic prevention and preparedness has inflicted a catastrophic toll.
Official data put the number of deaths at over 5 million; credible unofficial estimates are a multiple of that number.
The world has experienced the deepest economic contraction since World War II and a significant rollback in progress in education, poverty eradication, and inclusive development for a large swath of its population.
Rich nations must make good on pledges to donate projected substantial surplus vaccines, along w grants to bridge the $23 B shortfall needed to get jabs into arms and provide test kits and other medical supplies. All that is a very small price to shorten the pandemic everywhere.
We cannot avoid outbreaks altogether. But we can sharply reduce the risk that they will blow up into pandemics. The world has the scientific and technological capabilities and the financial resources to do so. However, to mobilize these resources, we need a new way of thinking.
Rather than financing global health security under the mantle of “aid for other nations,” we must treat it as a strategic investment in global public goods that benefit every nation—rich or poor.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
CBO estimate for tax-compliance efforts is conservative to the point of implausibility.
Assuming Admin is successfully able to develop & implement sound plans for IRS, I'm confident the proposed investments can generate more revenue than CBO assumes.
That is a large sum. But it's important to put it into context given the scope of the tax evasion problem faced by fed govt. Over next 10 yrs, IRS is on track to collect $7 T less than is owed. This enormous tax gap is around 3% of gross domestic product on an annualized basis
Today, the IRS has about the same number of auditors as it did during World War II, and the IRS can answer fewer than 30 percent of the phone calls it receives from taxpayers with questions.
There is a wise apocryphal saying often attributed to Keynes: When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do? After yrs of advocating more expansionary fiscal & monetary policy, I altered my view. I believe Admin & Fed. need to further adjust their thinking on inflation.
First, let’s not compound errors that have already been made with far too much fiscal stimulus and overly easy monetary policy by rejecting Build Back Better. The legislation would spend less over 10 yrs than was spent on stimulus in 2021.
@paulkrugman continues his efforts to minimize the inflation threat to the American economy and progressive politics by pointing to the fact that inflation surged and then there was a year of deflation after World War 2.
If this is the best argument for not being alarmed that someone as smart, rhetorically effective and committed as Paul can make, my anxiety about inflation is increased.
Pervasive price controls were removed after the war. Economists know that measured prices with controls are artificial, so subsequent inflation proves little.
John Authers reviews the various measures and arguments used to minimize inflation over the last 9 months and concludes the argument is over. He is right. His piece should be required reading at the Fed Board of Governors, Treasury and White House.
@USTreasury concludes $80B of funding to IRS will result in $400B in additional revenue for IRS over the decade. This is most significant offset in BBB package & one I am thrilled to see included. I have long believed robust attack on tax gap first order for tax reform efforts
If anything, @USTreasury estimates are conservative. @NatashaRSarin and I estimated that a $100B investment in the IRS focused on high-end enforcement (like Admin proposal is) would generate $800B+ over the course of the decade, outside of info reporting, which raises even more.
Our estimates are lower than those of former Commissioners Charles Rossotti and Fred Goldberg ($1.6T), who have also written in this space. shrinkthetaxgap.com/reform-proposa…