1 acre can house a total of around 4840 people for Namaz.
3/n Hence The Waqf board's total land can house approximately 11,27,720.
This is almost 28 times the Muslim Population of Gurugram.
Now for the sake of argument assume that all these 233 acres site are constructed.
4/n Then say, 60% of Ground Coverage has happened. Despite that too around 120 acres of land will be open to sky.
This too can house around 12 times the total Gurugram Muslim Population for Namaz.
5/n Now let us assume that a total of Namaz reading eligible population is 15 crore in Bharat.
Which means, they need 15,00,00,000 X 9 sqft land=135 crore sqft=30992 sqft
Now what is total land area under Waqf Board?
6/n The Waqf board has around 6,00,000 Acres of land as of 2009
So if they are giving away 5% of land each & every Muslim can do congregational Namaz in India.
Why are they ever needed to come in Road etc?
7/n Now let us take an example of a Muslim leader from Hyderabad. @asadowaisi has declared property with site area of around 4 acres. The BUA shown is almost 1 acres.
That means even if it is three floor building, at least 3.5 acres land are open spaces.
8/n It suggests that @asadowaisi can accommodate Namaz of around 17000 people in his property. And by logic eligible Friday Namaz reading population is not more than 20-21,000 in Gurugram.
So imagine, had distance been not an issue, Owaisi itself can accommodate 82%.
9/n What I mean to say is that even if forget Waqf board for a while & all Muslim Leaders, activists give away their open lands for Namaz, Friday Namaz can actually happen without disturbing community spaces.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reason why Hindu Civilisation survived despite the places like Persia being islamised at so much ease?
It is because Persian Royalty accepted the Christianity of Lakhmids which was different from that Byzantine supported.
Persian King was quite happy that Lakhmids & Eastern Church had turned religious enemy of Byzantine on the matter of Jesus being seen as Human & not son of god.
Nestorians were on rise.
To supersede the Byzantines, the cross culture between Sassanids & Lakhmids led to arrival/ creation of Islam.
In no time the Persians became Muslims. All historical accounts support this.
It should be written as "Hindutva", not "Hindustava".
What is "your" minister? Get some sanity when you wish to deal with history.
Ambedkar saw "CONGRESS & GANDHI" as root supporter of Untouchability that is why wrote the book framing them & not RSS, HM or Savarkar.
Well @lovekeshchandra , yes Ambedkar chose to walk in "Buddha Panth" but his reason as political person were GANDHI & CONGRESS. They failed to do anything for Dalits, rather they intensified problems.
He put it openly in his book.
You keep blaming Hindutva & Savarkar @lovekeshchandra for untoucability. While Gandhi kept talking lofty he wanted a Dalit to remain Shudra by profession forever Savarkar was practically making things happen through intercaste dining, patitpawan mandir.
Interestingly, author Jha, claims in the article that Kathak & Khayal Gayaki were born in period of Amir Khusraw.
What a joke.
The roots of Kathak is found in "Natya Shastra". Even the conservative Marxist historians place this text 3-4 centuries before so called birth of Jesus
"The Arya Samaj was the first Hindu movement to take up a bold stand in this context. Maharshi Dayanand himself had showed up Muhammad for the sort of man he was."
in his book, "Freedom of expression: Secular theocracy versus liberal democracy."
SR Goel writes, "He (Dayanand) made a positive contribution when he pointed out that India had inherited a spirituality and a culture which were not only indigenous but also intrinsically superior to the imported creeds and cultures...
...He encouraged and enabled his people to reawaken to their own inner sources of strength, and hold their heads high in the face of foreign invaders. He was the first to use the terms Swadeshi and Swarajya.