Marital rape.

A 🧵
#coercivecontrol
Despite the historical myth that rape by one’s partner is a relatively insignificant event, causing little trauma, research shows that partner rape often has severe and long-lasting consequences for women.
History:

The traditional definition of rape was, ‘sexual intercourse with a female not his wife without her consent’ and it was not until 1991 that rape within marriage was recognised in law in England and Wales.
One in four women who will be involved in physically abusive relationships are especially vulnerable to rape from their partners. Studies show that between a third and half of women experiencing physical abuse are also raped by their partners at least once.
This is experienced in various ways; some are physically abused during the sexual violence whilst others are raped following a physically violent episode where the husband wants to ‘make up’. Other women experience sadistic or obsessive rape and
these assaults involve torture and/or ‘perverse’ sexual acts and are often very physically violent and involve pornography.
Women raped by their husbands are likely to be raped many times – often 20 x or more. Survivors of partner rape not only experience a higher number of assaults, but research indicates that they are more likely than women raped by acquaintances to experience oral and anal rape.
Husbands often rape their wives when they are asleep, or use coercion, verbal threats, physical violence, or weapons to force their wives to have sex.
Importantly, some researchers have found that compared to men who ‘only’ physically abuse, men who physically abuse and rape are particularly dangerous individuals and are more likely to severely injure their female partners and potentially escalate the violence to murder.
While the research thus far reveals no composite picture of a partner-rapist, these men are often portrayed as jealous, domineering individuals who feel a sense of entitlement to have sex with their ‘property.’
Women appear to be particularly at risk for being raped by their partners under some circumstances which include being pregnant, being ill or recently discharged from hospital.
Women are at a particularly high risk of experiencing physical and sexual violence when they attempt to leave since this represents a challenge to the abusers’ control. One study found that two thirds of women in their sample were sexually assaulted at the end of the relationship
Despite the historical myth that rape by one’s partner is a relatively insignificant event, causing little trauma, research shows that partner rape often has severe and long-lasting consequences for women.
Rape by a partner is more likely to result in physical injury than rape by a stranger. The physical effects of partner rape may include injuries to the vaginal and anal areas, lacerations, soreness, bruising, torn muscles, fatigue and vomiting.
Campbell and Alford (1989) report that one half of the partner rape survivors in their sample were kicked, hit or burned during sex. Specific gynaecological consequences of partner rape include vaginal stretching, miscarriages, stillbirths, bladder infections, infertility
and the potential contraction of sexually transmitted diseases including HIV infection.
Given that women who are raped by their partners are likely to experience multiple assaults and rape by someone that they once presumably loved and trusted, it is not surprising that partner rape survivors seem to suffer severe and long-term psychological trauma.
Similar to other survivors of sexual violence, some of the short-term effects of partner rape include anxiety, shock, intense fear, depression, suicidal ideation, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
Compared to women raped by strangers and those whom they don’t know well, partner rape survivors report even higher rates of anger and depression. Long term effects often include disordered eating, sleep problems, depression, problems establishing trusting relationships,
and increased negative feelings about themselves. Research has also indicated that the psychological effects are likely to be long lasting. Some partner rape survivors report flash-backs, sexual dysfunction, and emotional pain for years after the violence.
Women raped by their husbands may hesitate to report because of family loyalty, fear of their abuser’s retribution, inability to leave the relationship, or they may not know that rape in marriage is against the law or even ‘name’ their experience as rape.
Many women (and men) believe that only stranger rape is ‘real rape;’ and other women see sex in marriage as an obligation and define forced sex as a ‘wifely duty,’ not rape.
If women do not ‘name’ their experiences as rape, they are unlikely to seek outside assistance to stop the violence.

Source: newstatesman.com/uncategorized/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Coercive Control & Recovering From Trauma

Coercive Control & Recovering From Trauma Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CCCBuryStEd

16 Oct
The red flags of dating that seem romantic.
🚩 ❤️🚩❤️🚩❤️🚩❤️🚩❤️

A THREAD 🧵
1/ He insists on picking you up from your home because he is * a gentleman*.
2/ He insists on making all the choices. The venue/the food/the wine.
Read 16 tweets
25 Sep
He hasn’t hit me or punched me or strangled me or threatened to kill me.
He hasn’t done any of that, he’s not like that. He’d never hurt me. He’s not like that.
He doesn’t hit me. He’d never hit me.

But he pushed me against the wall, when I got a text from a boy and said he was jealous.

I blamed myself for making him feel sad and stopped talking to this boy.
Read 17 tweets
9 Sep
Have been trying to manage the biggest panic attack in a long time. Up for hours. Struggling to breathe.

Not posting this for sympathy, but to illustrate the very real ongoing impact of trauma & the often time-consuming nature of regulating. Recovery often is not linear.
🧵
I rarely get severe panic attacks during the day. I know my body well enough to recognise symptoms in the earlier stages and prudent enough to know not to ignore the warning signs when they appear.

Ignoring them because I’m too busy is simply not an option.
I still get panic attacks when I am asleep and waking up scared out of my wits - hyperventilating and with my heart racing is still a regular occurrence.

And it’s not something I have been able to prevent/control.

Believe me, I have tried.
Read 25 tweets
3 Sep
Little nuggets of truth that no one teaches you and that you have to find out yourself.

A THREAD
People showing empathy aren’t necessarily empathic.
Some are able to approximate empathy.

It’s important to recognise the difference and to be aware that some convey it to manipulate and/or harm.
People who give to charity aren’t always charitable.

There are those who genuinely want to help others and then there are those who only do it so it reflects well on them.

Or because they want to be recognised for it.
Read 13 tweets
25 Jul
Review of research and case law on parental alienation
by @julie_doughty Nina Maxwell and Tom Slater,
Commissioned by Cafcass Cymru April 2018

A précis:

THREAD
*Parental alienation* was first recognised by Wallerstein and Kelly in 1976, but Gardner’s assertion in 1987 that parental alienation was a syndrome - a mental condition suffered by children who had been alienated by their mothers, which has led to debate over the last 30 years.
Despite a wealth of papers written by academics, legal and mental health professionals, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on the topic.
Read 36 tweets
4 Jul
Britney Spears

How her father and a team of lawyers seized control of her life and have held on to it for thirteen years.

A THREAD

#FreeBritney
L.A. County Judge Brenda Penny not only reminded those listening to Britney Spears’ testimony about the court policy against recording, but also against live-tweeting & told those physically in the courtroom that they needed to use a pen & paper instead of a laptop for notes.
The viral audio of the testimony began circulating just hours after the hearing, including in a YouTube post that has since been taken down because of a copyright claim from the court.
Read 54 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(