Did you know that on December 5th 1921, the English Football Association (FA) passed a resolution BANNING women's football matches from being played in their stadiums?
To mark the 100th anniversary, the delayed Women's #FACup Final is taking place at Wembley Stadium TODAY, as part of a day celebrating the women's game that their organization stymied for 50 years.
Women's football was incredibly popular prior to the ban.
At the time of the ban in 1921, women's football in England was thriving, in no small part due to the all-conquering Preston-based team 'Dick, Kerr Ladies FC', who played matches raising money for charitable causes, & frequently drew five-figure crowds.
The Dick, Kerr Ladies played all over the country, most notably attracting an estimated 53,000 fans to Goodison Park in Liverpool on Boxing Day 1920.
It is believed that the success of the women's game was concerning to the miserable old farts at the FA.
The FA was worried they may divert paying spectators away from the professional men's game.
Citing medical opinion which considered football as "most unsuitable for a women's frame" & "quite inappropriate", the FA banned its clubs from staging women's matches in their stadiums.
Although not an outright ban of the women's game per se, it limited the then amateur women's teams to playing on smaller grounds and away from the media spotlight.
Without the income from ticket sales to cover the players' expenses, most clubs disbanded.
It was not until 1971 that The FA lifted the ban on women's football, which was now run by an independent governing body, the Women's Football Association (WFA).
It was not until 1993 that the FA brought all women's football under its direct control.
Every previous winning captain in the competition's 50-year history has been invited to attend today's FA Cup final, and as a tribute, their names will be displayed on the steps leading up to the Royal Box from where the trophy will be presented to the winning team.
The Women's FA Cup was suspended due to #COVID19, but the men's competition continued as the FA only classify the top two women's leagues as meeting the elite standard required to satisfy the government's exceptions at the time which allowed sport to continue during the pandemic.
The season before women's football was banned in 1921, there were only two professional men's leagues in England, but allowed to develop organically, men's football can now sustain four professional divisions.
Women's football was not given the same opportunity.
"People might (now) have some understanding as to why the women's game isn't as developed as the men's game - why we are where we are. Then they'll actually start looking at it as its own thing - because it is its own thing - & not keep directly comparing it to the men's game."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
House of Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle has promised to raise allegations of drug use in Parliament with the Met Police, after traces of cocaine had been found in several lavatory areas.
The Government estimates that last year there were around 300,000 opiate or crack users in England, & around one million people using cocaine per year.
The latest ONS figures for England suggest that one in 11 adults aged 16 to 59 years took a drug in the year to March 2020.
Just 5% of voters think politicians are in the job primarily for the good of the country.
In 2014, 48% of voters believed politicians were “out merely for themselves” as opposed to their country or party, it was 57% by May 2021, & 63% last week.
Growing distrust in politicians should be of great concern to democrats & progressives: growing distrust can lead to a downwards spiral of democratic decline, with voters disengaging, becoming polarised, or turning to populist leaders and causes.
It's terrifying that in 2021 the Tories - just like the US Republicans, Viktor Orban, Jair Bolsonaro, Modi, Putin & other antidemocratic authoritarian leaders - are using the fascist playbook, unhindered by either mass protests or a concerned news media.
It's often impossible to know exactly what caused or motivated their despicable behaviour: some have been abused themselves, others have psychological problems, there may even be biological causes.
Whatever the cause, some behaviours are intolerable, & it's only right that they should be removed from society.
But it is often impossible to be 100% certain about what motivated a person to engage in cruelty toward children.
There's certainly something wrong with them.
However, certain sections of the press are imho deeply irresponsible in their reporting of child abuse.
What I object to is the predictable, instant, & speculative demonisation of social workers, police officers & doctors by some sections of the press, without knowing the facts.
The horrific news about Arthur has of course shocked, angered, & distressed all of us.
And I hate to say it, but the predictable, instant, & opportunistic politicisation of this tragic case by the usual toxic newspapers, makes me feel sick & angry.
Here we go again...
In January 2003 Lord Laming published the report of his official inquiry into the death of Victoria Climbie.
She had been sent to Britain by her parents from the Ivory Coast, in the hope she would receive a better education. She was in the care of her great-aunt.
With her boyfriend she systematically tortured Victoria over several years until she died in 2000. The aunt and boyfriend were imprisoned for life for murder in 2001. An official inquiry was immediately announced.
The inquiry lasted 62 days and took evidence from 128 witnesses.
In 2019, one of the USA's foremost civil liberties lawyers published a book describing how America’s constitutional checks & balances were being pushed to the brink by a president consciously following Hitler’s extremist propaganda & policy template from the early 1930s.
Imho, the rhetorical & policy similarities displayed by Boris Johnson & the UK's @Conservatives, to the ones used by the Nazis & the Trump administration, are now impossible to ignore.
Trump "became the twenty-first-century master of divisive rhetoric... Hitler didn’t take power by force. He used a set of rhetorical tropes codified in Trump’s bedside reading that persuaded enough Germans to welcome Hitler as a populist leader."