Marc Owen Jones Profile picture
Dec 10, 2021 13 tweets 11 min read Read on X
[Thread] 1/ This is an update on the #DoNotComply and #DoNotComplyEver hashtag. Both began trending again when mandatory mask wearing was introduced after the discovery of the Omicron variant. Since my last thread, I analysed approx 26000 tweets, between 5th -10th December Image
2/ In the following thread I will discuss

a) who the main influencers are
b) the salient political communities promoting the hashtag
c) any potentially unusual elements to the hashtag

Read on for more.

#OmicronVariant #Omicron
3/ Firstly, influencers. As with my previous thread, the British actor @LozzaFox remains the most influential account spreading the 'Do Not Comply message'. His posturing tweet of December 8th was retweeted almost 2k times, and liked around 8k times. #omicron #FridayFeeling ImageImageImage
4/ The second most influential account @LeAdderNoire - a self-proclaimed 'Gammon', whose call to defy all restrictions got around 500 RTs and 1500 likes. ImageImage
5/ There are a bunch of verified 'celebs', politicians and journalists endorsing the do not comply message, e.g @kezia_noble @SkySportsPL Journalist @jacktwilkinson journalist @SoniaPoulton - bad science nutrionist @GillianMcKeith US congressman @RepDanBishop, to name but a few.. ImageImageImage
6/ An interesting, potentially suspicious, but not definitely, is the speed at which @LozzaFox got engagement. The below graph shows activity on the hashtag over time, and by account. What the below shows is that LozzaFox's tweet of 8th December got a lots of engagement rapidly Image
7/ This could just be normal viral engagement, or possible artificial amplification. It's difficult to tell. Next tweet I will discuss who is spreading the #donotcomply message #OmicronVariant
8/ The overall analysis of the hashtag reveals once again that the most cohesive community spreading the #donotcomply message are right-wing, pro Trump conservatives. 'MAGA' and 'Trump' are the 5th and 6th most common biographical descriptors, 'conservative' the 10th Image
9/ Again, we see polarisation.The majority of users in the top sector of the graph do not wish to comply, while a small community at the bottom are pushing back against the do not comply trend. An analysis of the pro complying community reveals they are 'liberal' #OmicronVarient Image
10/ An analysis of the pro comply crowd reveals support for 'democrats' 'black lives matter' and 'liberal' position. These are generally the key markers. Again, this is what we would expect given what we know about vaccine hesitancy among the right. #OmicronVarient #omicron Image
11/ There are some non-UK/US communities here too (among the donotcomply crowd). This dutch account for example, @BananaMediaQ , which supports
#Nexit , and @Qhawe___L - which writes on African affairs ImageImageImage
12/ Some takeaways>

1) #DoNotComply encouraged predominantly by right-wing & libertarian accounts
2) UK actor @LozzaFox a key, influential repeat offender in messaging
3) New measures prompt new waves of DoNotComply messaging
4) Little sign yet of cross-party online support
13/

Notice: Figures here don't portray, although may indicate extent of problem offline

Hope you enjoyed, thanks for reading!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Owen Jones

Marc Owen Jones Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marcowenjones

Nov 20
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both). Image
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on Image
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
Read 4 tweets
Nov 14
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right

Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
Read 6 tweets
Nov 9
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below Image
Image
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift! Image
Image
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video. Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 8
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed. Image
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people. Image
Image
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism. Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 8
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.

Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants. Image
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans. Image
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism. Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 29
🧵 'At least 1,800 bots on the social media site X are promoting the controversial choice of Azerbaijan, a major oil and gas producer, to host next month’s ...#COP29, according to a new analysis shared exclusively with The Washington Post".

washingtonpost.com/climate-enviro…Image
2/ The analysis by Marc Owen Jones, an expert on disinformation at @NUQatar, focused on roughly 2,800 X accounts that collectively sent around 10,800 tweets, retweets and replies about the conference between Oct. 17 and Oct. 24.
3/ Detection

73% of all accounts active in sample created in the space of 3 quarters in 2024.

Conservative estimates suggest 66% (1876) accounts in the sample are fake (bots) based on activity over the past week Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(