NEW: As the U.S. approaches 800,000 COVID-19 deaths, our @KFF analysis finds 163,000 deaths could have been prevented by vaccination since June
healthsystemtracker.org/brief/covid19-…
@KrutikaAmin @JaredOrtaliza @PetersonCHealth
@KFF @KrutikaAmin @JaredOrtaliza @PetersonCHealth 2/ Our analysis also finds COVID was the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S. in November. healthsystemtracker.org/brief/covid19-…
3/ In October, the most recent month with age-specific data, COVID-19 was the #1 killer of people age 45-54 in the U.S. healthsystemtracker.org/brief/covid19-…
4/ This is an update to a brief we published in October. At that time, we estimated there had been 90,000 preventable Covid deaths.

Now, we estimate there have been over 70,000 *additional* preventable deaths in just the last 2 months. Horrifying.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cynthia Cox

Cynthia Cox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cynthiaccox

17 Nov
Curious how the Medicaid expansion works in Build Back Better? Here's a quick thread.
In short, BBB would close the Medicaid coverage gap in states like FL and TX that haven't expanded the program by allowing people living under poverty in those states to access ACA subsidies 🧵 Image
2/ People in states that have already expanded Medicaid with incomes under 138% of poverty would still have Medicaid.
Starting in 2022, if BBB passes, 2.2 million uninsured people living in 12 Medicaid non-expansion states could get heavily subsidized coverage through ACA markets Image
3/ If BBB passes: In states that do not expand Medicaid, people with incomes under 138% of poverty would get free ($0 premium silver plans) that, in 2022, have an actuarial value of 94% (very low deductible) and from 2023-2025 have an actuarial value of 99% (maybe no deductible)
Read 6 tweets
17 Nov
🧵 Here's an updated summary of the major health provisions in Build Back Better.
It has changed from the original version, so I'll walk through the current version in this thread 🧵(1/10)
Click the link for more data on potential costs and impact: kff.org/health-reform/…
2/ Build Back Better would boost ACA Marketplace subsidies through 2025 (original version was permanent). Upper/middle income people would not be priced out of coverage and low-income people would get free platinum-like plans, thru 2025. Over a million people could gain coverage.
3/ Build Back Better would create a new Medicare hearing benefit (no longer dental/vision). Hearing aids would be available every 5 years with 20% coinsurance. There are about 36 million Medicare beneficiaries in traditional Medicare who currently lack this coverage.
Read 10 tweets
1 Jul
With new regulations on #SurpriseBills expected to drop momentarily, a reminder that about 1 in 5 emergency visits results in an out-of-network charge, putting patients at risk of surprise bills healthsystemtracker.org/brief/an-exami…
Even for childbirth -- something patients have months to prepare for, and it's common for new parents to even go on TOURS of hospitals in preparation for -- 1 in 10 in-network hospitalizations comes with an out-of-network charge healthsystemtracker.org/brief/surprise…
Soon, most surprise billing practice should stop with implementation of the No Surprises Act.

But there are holes in these protections, particularly for ground ambulance rides (which are exactly the sort of situations patients feel powerless in). healthsystemtracker.org/brief/ground-a…
Read 12 tweets
18 Feb
NEW on House COVID Relief:

•3.4M+ people would be guaranteed $0 plans with deductibles under $200

•8M ppl are subject to full-priced premiums now. Many in the subsidy cliff would save $500/month

•States with biggest savings include WY, NE, WV, SD

kff.org/health-reform/…
2/ Under the House proposal, most of the ~14 million people buying on the individual market and the ~15 million uninsured people who could be on the ACA Marketplace would see lower ACA premiums. That savings could be used to get lower deductible plans, too.
3/ The House COVID Relief proposal would yield big savings for the older adults buying ACA Marketplace plans, particularly those above 4x the poverty rate (~$52k single income).

But the zero-premium low-deductible plans for low-income people are at least as big of a game changer
Read 5 tweets
10 Nov 20
At her confirmation, #AmyConeyBarrett said the #ACA SCOTUS case is about severability.

That assumes the individual mandate is unconstitutional, and the question before the court is: 𝘾𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝘾𝘼 𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙?

The data shows it can... 1/9
2/ The individual mandate 𝗵𝗮𝗱 been seen as essential to the ACA’s individual market. The thought 𝗵𝗮𝗱 been, if people with #PreexistingConditons can get coverage, people would wait 'til they got sick to get insurance. This would drive up premiums and lead to a "death spiral"
3/ As anyone who has read the ACA knows, it’s a big piece of legislation. There’s a lot that has nothing to do with the individual mandate. Like calorie labeling, biosimilar approval, closing the Medicare donut hole. There was never a risk of a death spiral in Medicaid expansion.
Read 9 tweets
10 Nov 20
Does Biden’s presidential win make the ACA (#Obamacare) more likely to survive tomorrow’s Supreme Court case?

Only marginally, and it would all come down to Georgia.

Here's why: (1/7)
2/ The Trump Admin is arguing in court that the ACA should be struck down. A Biden Admin would change positions to defend the law.

But the Trump admin’s exit has no effect on the plaintiffs in the case – 18 Republican-led states + two individuals – who aren’t backing out
3/ There’s nothing administrative that Biden can do unilaterally as president to reverse the course of the ACA case. Biden can’t simply issue an executive order and make it go away. This case is now up to the largely conservative SCOTUS to decide.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(