This is a good podcast. It summaries the far reaching impact SCOTUS’s recent decision regarding the Texas abortion decision. After reviewing the decision, I’ve come to the conclusion that Gorsuch essentially explains how states can overcome 1/

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-u…
federal preemption. Federal preemption is where federal law or decision on a particular issue negates a states ability to legislate in a manner contrary to federal action. In this instance, federal law/decision - Stare Decisis - has ruled that a woman has a right to an 2/
abortion. The recent Texas law doesn’t “completely” outlaw abortion but creates a scenario which makes it functionally improbable frustrating the purpose of federal law/intent. It also deputizes civilians to “report on their neighbors” if they undertake an abortion /3
procedure outside the permissible scope of the law. Very Gestapo/Stasi/KGB like. Gorsuch also describes the path states can take to further an agenda of undermining federal preemption in other areas of law. This is a really bad precedent. Robert directly criticizes /4
the 5-4 majority opinion written by Gorsuch. This decision undermines SCOTUS itself. It’s an attack on Marbury and judicial review of state action. It gives everything the South wanted pre-civil war. Very problematic. X

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew C Laufer, Esq

Andrew C Laufer, Esq Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lauferlaw

8 Dec
There were two types of subpoenas issued by the @January6thCmte to Meadows. A subpoena for testimony and one for documents. It appears he may have complied with the document subpoena, we don’t know if he fully complied, but not with the one for testimony. 1/
A subject of a subpoena must either fully comply with all of its aspects or seek judicial intervention to limit its scope or quash (love this word) the subpoena in total - nullify it.Failure to do either results in a contempt proceeding - fines & imprisonments. The penalties 2/
can, & usually do, continue until there’s compliance with the subpoena. For example, @xychelsea was imprisoned due to her failure to comply with a grand jury subpoena concerning Assange for the entire term it was seated. If she had agreed to testify, she would have been released.
Read 4 tweets
19 Nov
There's so many emotionally driven "hot takes" regarding the #RittenhouseVerdict As a trial attorney, unless I'm in the room, I respect the jury's verdict. May not like or agree with it, but they were the ones who heard ALL the evidence. KR was able to afford a proper defense.1/
He was able to raise over $500k due to the publicity of the case. Most ppl are unable to do that. There are hundreds, both white & POC alike, of ppl who are force to take bad plea deals or are wrongly convicted bc they had an overwhelmed public defender who was unable to pay 2/
enough attention to their matter. Most ppl live paycheck to paycheck. They can be easily victimized by a judicial system that doesn't have enough time to address their particular circumstances. A good "paid" attorney can compel the system to do just that and make it more 3/
Read 5 tweets
15 Nov
Could the media pls stop the hyper-criticism of Biden? It’s stupid and insulting to the intelligence. He’s been in office for 10 months. He successfully passed #Covid relief & infrastructure bills. These are huge accomplishments. Is he the “bestest” POTUS ever? No. 1/
Is he the worst? No. Is he 10 billion times better than Trump? Yes. Will inflation continue to plague us after supply disruptions resolve? Perhaps. Today’s media appears to thrive on chaos and dissension. Profitable? Yes. Healthy for our Republic? No. Our nation 2/
requires a base line for all media to report above. The fairness doctrine won’t work due to the advent and proliferation of social media. We require a modern version which disallows intentional distortion of facts and the manufacturing of false narratives which aim to 3/
Read 4 tweets
13 Oct
So it appears that the @January6thCmte subpoenas for records have not been complied with. The production of these documents are necessary for the committee to both conduct and enhance their ability to question witnesses under oath. Without them, it /1
it will be much more difficult to conduct questioning since these key documents weren’t produced. Bannon and Patel have be subpoenaed to appear tmr while Meadows and Scavino are to appear on Thursday. The committee claims they’re engaged w Patel & Meadows. Usually that means 2/
the parties are negotiating what documents are subject to the subpoena & when they will testify. In the present instance, I believe this type of negotiation to be a mistake. The Committee should demand production of what they deem necessary to conduct their investigation 3/
Read 13 tweets
12 Oct
After taking some time to consider what @AdamKinzinger stated regarding the criminal referral of non-compliant subpoenaed persons to DOJ, I’ve determined that this the wrong way to proceed. Congress needs to hold these individuals in inherent contempt if they do not comply w 1/
the #January6thCommittee subpoenas. They need to be taken into custody & imprisoned until compliance. Just like a judge presiding over a Grand Jury, Congress has the power to imprison individuals until documents are produced and testimony is garnered. 2/
If you allow DOJ and the Courts to do Congress’s job, you’re ceding your authority to the other branches. If the House flips during the midterms, these putative witnesses will run out the clock until the new Congress is seated. If you’re worried about opening 3/
Read 8 tweets
11 Sep
If I can make one request this 9/11 anniversary, it would be to stop politicizing the attacks. Al Qaeda’s assault wasn’t only against democrats, republicans, or independents. They attacked all of us. They attacked what we stand for. They attacked our freedom and democracy. 1/
They attacked America. When the list of the victims is read, I don’t hear what political party they belonged to. I hear their names and the pain their deaths brought to all of us. I am also reminded of the thousands of deaths that are still occurring decades after 2/
due to the toxins first responders, volunteers, and those who worked and lived downtown were exposed to. That’s what 9/11 is about. The victims memories and how we all came together to morn the loss and confront those responsible for the heinous attacks. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(