The tale of Two Prime Ministers, a blast and a rebuild.
Bhagavān Sreerāmakrishna Paramahamsa revealed to the world how death in Kāshi gave Mukthi.
He describes seeing Lord Shiva sitting by the head of the corpse on the pyre and chanting Tāraka Mantra (Rāma) in its ear.
Sitting at the foot of the corpse, Dēvi Pārvati removes each of the five mantles of Māya (Kala, Kāla, Rāga, Niyati, Avidya) from the Jīva.
With the Tāraka Mantra infused and the veils of Māya removed, the Jīva lives and dies many times in a split second and attains Mōksha.
This is how sacred and important the Mahāshmashāna - the burning ghats of Kāshi are.
Now the tale of the first PM.
In 1986, Rajiv Gandhi ordered to replace these pyre grounds with electric crematorium under GAP. Clean Ganga was NOT the only reason as you know.
Hindus were highly stressed as pyres were not freely allowed for a time.
I have heard from the Doms and priests of Kāshi that they would stealthily burn a proper pyre and smear that ash on the Lord.
Every practising Hindu was pained at this act of the 'secular' government.
The irony was that for a man who thought burning pyres was making Ganga and Kāshi dirty, he didn't have enough of his own body to burn. Unfortunate.
30 years later, another PM took over Kāshi. This time to restore, to give new life - not only to Kāshi, but to the whole universe.
As our Puranas say, Kāshi is the most ancient city in the world, and it is the real centre of the universe.
@narendramodi Ji's renovation and restructuring of the Lord's abode par exceeds collective efforts of Kings and Queens over hundreds of years.
Every time we restored it, destructive forces broke it. It was not easy to achieve what Modi Ji has.
As our Prime Minister opens the Kāshi-Vishwanāth corridor tomorrow, he will be carrying the blessings of the dead, the living, and the unborn souls of India.
Har Har Mahādev!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The competitive game India has been able to play in recent times gives hope not only to our own future, but also to countries that look upon India as a friend, philosopher and guide.
Keeping our civilisational integrity in the world driven by consumerism; and preserving India’s long legacy of being the Culture Guru of the world is a challenge India can only tide over with careful planning beyond the current geopolitics.
• An inherently proud generation to take on the world.
Age and skills do not bring home the demographic dividends. A national pride is needed.
How India can achieve this in the face of manipulative social engineering is a clear challenge for us.
Making Ajit Doval the National Security Advisor was a much-anticipated move.
However, little did the world expect that a country like India would have the craft and dare to define its own terms while
it’s still a developing country.
Narendra Modi’s new style of leadership powered by Subramaniam Jaishankar’s diplomatic orchestrations and Doval’s formidable combination of master strategy and meticulous footwork enabled India to wield a commanding position in the
emerging multi-polar world.
Modi’s swearing in ceremony asserted India’s lead role in the SAARC countries, but it was the Paris summit on climate change that displayed India’s changing geopolitics in the world arena.
It was obvious from the declaration of ‘climate justice’ by
A world order but in India’s terms: emerging Indian geopolitics - Sreevidya Balasubramaniam
In this thread, I unpack @narendramodi Ji's geopolitics from an outside perspective. To show contrast, I am giving a brief of the past diplomacy as part 1.
India’s past foreign policy
Non-alignment was a foreign policy instrument India followed since her independence.
It sat on a pile of post-war assumptions of the emerging world order. Promoting peace made the core of India’s foreign policy as a pre-condition to development.
However, this policy had long become redundant in the face of a ballooning war economy globally.
Like many domestic policies post-independence, non-alignment was also strongly influenced by the socialist ideas in support of the Soviet Union in the protracted bipolar power-
their so called opposition is shamefully struggling to figure out who their leader today is.
This being the context, our intellectuals start advising how we don’t have a robust ‘opposition’ and the importance of having an opposition.
This is the biggest collective delusion.
If judiciary can work without ideology and opposition, then why can’t the Legislature and Executive work without a political process which costs a fortune, forcing parties to be at war constantly?
What is ideology? Why should ideology lead a group of people?