Is it possible to make any sound conclusions about the state of US - Russia dialogue over Ukraine and NATO already today? Obviously there way too many variables but I've tried to outline there major developments. Thread 1/6 ridl.io/en/the-drumrol…
Isolation of Russia is over. We will have a lot more meetings, summits and various negotiation formats. And this is good. The half-isolations of the last 7 years proved to be pointless. For as long as Putin is ready to talk, it is cheaper to listen.
2/6
Russia-NATO status-quo is over. Something will have to change. Too soon to tell which way it would go - obviously Article 10 would not be altered but there are ambitious yet hard options that could be investigated. It is crucial to be open and keep in mind that Russia
3/6
would also need to compromise. It doesn't have to be a loss for the West. A version of new CFE treaty should be on the table.
US is already becoming part of Minsk, Biden made it clear he will press Kyiv to unblock peace process.
4/6
Moscow signals that it would take this seriously once Steinmeier Formula is back on the table and is prepared to be incorporated into Ukrainian law. Maybe Donfried visit will help clear things out.
This is good not because it right but because the alternative is horrible.
5/6
None of this means military escalation is off the table and it is imperative to keep talking.
Putin is not crazy, his primary goal is to survive politically for as long as possible. Even the fact that he is ready to risk does not mean that he will.
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vladislav Inozemtsev here argues you can't defeat Putin, you can only outlive him. Why?
Thread 1/14 ridl.io/en/outliving-p…
Putin’s system is in some ways not a state in the traditional sense of the word. It lacks clear ideology; it has rather blurred and undefined boundaries; and, most importantly, it does not distinguish between the private and public spheres, treating both quite arbitrarily 2/14
It is hostile to legal culture as such, constantly changing the rules and passing vague laws that could victimise any of its subjects at any given time. The nature of this bizarre regime is set by the main goal of its beneficiaries: personal enrichment. 3/14
Fresh @levada_ru about the ongoing escalation over Ukraine.
Only 4%(!) believe Russia is responsible
50% think it is NATO
16% - Ukraine
3% - DNR/LNR
Thread
75%(!!!) do not exclude it could lead to Russia - Ukraine war
Of them, 3% think it is inevitable, 36% - highly likely, 38% - least likely;
only 15% think it is impossible
What does it say? 1. Propaganda continues to work quite well when it come to foreign policy, Kremlin fully controls the narrative. 2. The language of "defense" appeal impeccably. See Olesya Zakharova on how it is constructed - ridl.io/en/the-languag…;
Was just reminded of this Kasparov quote:
"Russia's war with Ukraine is the final stage of historic confrontation of Kievan Rus and Byzantium/Golden Horde". He is juxtaposing "good" European civilization with a "bad" Asian one. A small thread.
1/5
I find it quite hilarious that Byzantine Empire's tradition is being framed as an Asian one.
Poor Eastern Roman Empire. Oh well.
But main problem with that comparison is that it is often used as a racist one - Ukrainians as white Europeans vs. Russians the Tatars/Ugrians
2/5
A final frontier of Europe vs. Barbarians of the East.
I get why it is attractive for some in Ukraine, especially on the right but it is embarrassing really.
Russia is Europe. And it is acting as a European power...of the 19th century.
3/5
Total of 4,876 election campaigns were held in Russia. The most important one was Duma election. What's new here? "New People" - not only getting 5.6% but also getting into 20 regional parliaments.
A year before the elections it had only 1% of public recognition.
2/7
New People had receive a lot of state support: large TV air time, did not face any obstructions. Most of the people in the party are unknowns.
At the same time - Yabloko became a regional party, loosing federal support and getting less than 3%. 3/7
Kortunov of @Russian_Council published a piece arguing that there would be no war between Russia and Ukraine. Let's look at his key thesis. Thread
1. People who argue they know what Putin wants, how he thinks and what exactly his logic is - are wrong.
- I tend to agree but it nevertheless doesn't mean we can't make reasonable assessments and arguments based on past experience, statements and context. Approximation at best
2. If Putin was preparing a real massive attack on Ukraine we would have not known about it. Look at Crimea.
- Well, Crimea was a special operation not a large offensive. So, this case is a bit different in scale.
But I do agree that what see is about signaling first
.@gavinbwilde asked what I think about the US support for Russian civil society and opposition and whether it helps them or not. Indeed, would it not help US-Russia relations if US stopped its efforts to support "democracy building in Russia"? Thread.
First and by most it is crucial to define what Russian state sees as "foreign interference"- foreign support for election monitoring missions, financing of journalist investigations, support for legal work with politically repressed and imprisoned,financing of libraries that 1/11
do lectures on "freedom loving literature", inviting Russians to speak on certain conferences abroad? This list would definitely be long and ever more confusing and absurd since what is considered "interference" is redefined almost daily: moreover it is not universal, 2/11