Had a lot of people angry at me today around my tweet on the #londonprotest . I agree with many of them. Mandates suck, passports suck, and I worry about the government finding more reasons/ways of disempowering people. But my focus is the virus, and what it may do to people.
The virus is relatively equaliser, it doesn't care if you are labor or conservative, rich or poor. The inequalities bred out are societal, not of its making. The government have taken full advantage of the despair and chaos to profit, and certainly advance their agenda.
With legislation around protests, whilst having parties themselves, they have shown themselves to be the selfish malignancies they are. However, I do not align myself with them, but the effort to reduce infection and save lives is a common theme that we all share.
People need to be supported financially as a result of any restrictive measures. People need to be supported. That is key, we would all agree. Do I think a government would use this to disenfranchise their opponents, yes. But I can know that and still realise we need to be safe.
The only comment that stung me today was being equated to Priti Patel. Look through my history, you could not be more wrong. But do I worry about the things you all do? Yes. But we need to survive to protest, we need to prevent lockdowns safely.
Large gatherings will increase the risk of spread, and bring them about. My comments are not about disempowering you, they are about trying to find a way of protecting people without becoming the enemy. That's hard to do, when the approaches overlap in some sense.
But if your doctor is telling you not to smoke, and your government (who you hate) is, its quite clear who to trust. But when your doctor and government are both telling you the same thing, we need to realise that even those who are opposed line up against a common foe.
When this is all done I will be just as likely as you to be protesting any demarcation of our rights. But we need to survive to get there.
tldr: i dont get paid by pharma, priti patel is a comic book witch, BJ is a selfish megalomaniac, lockdowns ruin livelihoods, but people survive. There is no simple win here, only losing less.
Anyway, go ahead, call me whatever. I won't hold a grudge. Keep safe, happy holidays, down with the man.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So let's talk about the #COVID19Vaccine and #Booster based on the evidence, including #death rates.* This data looks at non-vaccinated vs vaccinated (per dose) and booster (separate study). Links to the evidence are posted at the end of this thread.
Note before starting:
The ASMR (age-standardized mortality rate,) is a unit that compensates for differences between age groups. This is because mortality changes over age band, so it can be misleading not to adjust.
The use of 'person-years' is a unit designed to make sense of the number of people and time under an illness, i.e a measure of incidence and duration. The data used in the first study uses ASMR/100,000 person-years.
As a virus continues to spread, it gains opportunities to mutate. This happens in any species as part of reproduction, and some mutations are good for it, others bad for it, and others bad for us.
The emergence of 'variants' such as delta and omicron are those that have mutations that have enabled greater survival. This means that they have adapted more to the environment, including the vaccines.
What tires me most as NHS staff is that most of this is preventable.
Those refusing a vaccine that could save their (and others') lives are harming others and prolonging the pandemic as they paint themselves as the heroes. This is a juvenile fantasy.
Grow up, get jabbed.
Inb4 you are mean mr psychiatrist. Half of my ward has the infection. My patients are at a higher risk of severe illness. My words are less severe than death, get over it sunshine.
Oh and the bluetickbuffoons going on about nazi germany and freedom, go talk to a holocaust survivor about how a mask and vaccine is the same as Auschwitz. Stop insulting actual genocide survivors for retweets and sponsorships, plebs.
From an ontological standpoint, both psychoanalytic formulations and psychiatric diagnoses work on an estimate of categorical fluency between cases, to form a framework of workable ingress. It is not for either to claim moral authenticity over the other.
Even Laing would agree.
To proffer some level of deeper understanding is reasonable for the former, but this does not provide a tautology in moral reasoning, other than reductionism in a more specific form. Neither promotes a fair epistemology, only a translation by which work is done.
From a more superficial and ideological standpoint, I suggest that political conflict between the approaches is one of secondary narcissism, not a significant variation in practical application. One is not the tail of the other, but both the tail of the unicorn.
Let's take a moment to address some of the conspiracies around #covid19 using psychology and sociology. Thread/
First off, some basic ground theory to put this into context. Human beings work on a very primal level when emotions are high, using a number of cognitive shortcuts
Our emotions serve a primary purpose in survival, and as such they work fast in influencing our behaviour. These are very old, existing before the more clever aspects of our brains, and can be referred to as 'survival mechanisms.'
They evolved during a different time, where major threats were more simple. Aggression, starvation, predators. As such they needed to move quickly, creating fear, alliances based on protection, formation of groups (tribes.)