@jefoster_ The immune target being used, the spike protein, is not the spike protein of SARS-COV-2. The mRNA was synthetic, a kind of computer code directing the cell to make the synthetic spike protein. The code produced a mutated spike protein, or VARIANT. No way to tell if close...
@jefoster_ ...enough to enable the immune system to recognize the spike protein of the virus. The vaccine does not use the viral spike protein as claimed by Pfizer:
@jefoster_ 2. How does an mRNA vaccine work?
mRNA, delivered to your body's cells by lipid nanoparticles, instructs
@mentions
the cells to <<<generate the spike protein found on the surface of the novel coronavirus that initiates infection.>>>1,2 Instructing cells to generate the spike
@jefoster_ protein spurs an immune response, including generation of antibodies SPECIFIC TO THE SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
The above was from the FAQ section of the Pfizer Web site. I believe the phrase "specific to the SARS-COV-2 spike protein" is most important, particularly...
@jefoster_ "SPECIFIC TO." The reason for that is, the immune response is to the synthetic spike protein generated by the mRNA, not the spike protein of the vaccine. Immune response to any exposure to the virus is NOT SPECIFIC TO the spike protein of the virus.
@jefoster_ The vaccine immune response is geared only to the synthetic spike protein manufactured through the mRNA. This is a LIMITED RESPONSE to just that one thing. There is no flexibility to the response. I might be wrong, but my OPINION is this could be hampering the response.
@jefoster_ All of this made me think of this exchange:
@Glimmertwinz@markwynne@JemNicoleRN We were lied to when some in the medical/research field told us the vaccine does not leave the site of injection in the arm muscle. Well, that was never true as revealed by the interview with Dr. Shane Crotty, Phd in immunology.
@John_for_hope@RWMaloneMD I assume that the DNA damage repair is inhibited because of viral spike protein bonding to the ACE2 receptors of a number of cells, changing the gene expression of those cells and causing downstream damage.
@John_for_hope@RWMaloneMD We were not informed by vaccine developers and pharma executives that the spike protein was dangerous prior to the vaccines being rolled out. However, we were informed of a significant mutation of the SARS-COV-2 RNA genome coded by the vaccine developers that was...
@John_for_hope@RWMaloneMD ...originally described as a way to stop the vaccine spike protein from moving from a closed position to an open position, which was called "shape shifting," which the vaccine developers claimed would reduce immune response. In actuality, the mutation prevents the spike...
@Nowheremaam@KathMLee1 They are using spike protein as the immune trigger. As I reported to TLAV @YoureAllDunces I have yet to find an early (2020-January 2021) article or video that: 1. Informs public spike protein is dangerous. 2. Documents steps taking in vaccine development to neutralize danger.
@Nowheremaam@KathMLee1@YoureAllDunces In addition to no documentation of steps taken to eliminate spike protein danger, we found statements from Shane Crotty, phd. in a video that two claims of "safety features" were false. Those claims were made after the danger of spike proteins were revealed to general public...
Dr. Crotty says the developers always knew all the vaccine would NOT stay in the arm muscle. They wanted the vaccine to enter "rare" immune cells to familiarize immune system with vaccine. Vaccine..
@YoureAllDunces
Update in the ongoing investigation into disclosures to the public prior to release of vaccines.
A review of three more videos of participants in vaccine development and with credentials in microbiology, etc. reflected NO disclosures of the dangers of...
...the spike protein of the virus, and no disclosures of any safety measures to control the health threats of spike protein. The SP2 mutation of the spike protein, designed in the vaccine development labs, stabilized the spike protein in a "closed position."
This was so there would be a better immune response to the spike protein OF THE VACCINE, rather than to prevent the spike protein from binding to an ACE2 receptor of a cell.
@YoureAllDunces Something else has to be broached as we confront the addition of this claimed safety feature for the vaccine spike protein that is supposed to prevent binding to ACE2 receptors.
The creation of the safety feature would further change the RNA genome of the vaccine's spike protein from the genome of the virus' spike protein. I don't think this fact is remotely debatable, but desperation can result in just about anything.
These differences in the appearances, and the genetic structures between the spike protein of the vaccine and the spike protein of the virus inspire questions about the nature of what constitutes a VARIANT of a virus.
I am trying to find out why the long-known data of the spike protein being the engine of COVID-19 was not disclosed prior to EUA of vaccines. This is my second attempt to address this since stories keep changing. I'm going back to original articles/videos...
...and creating a kind of index document, complete with links, identifying content that could cause people to be misinformed and lead to rabbit hole research, etc.
In the course of conducting research, the following related information was found:
In this video, we find out what makes a SELF-AMPLIFYING vaccine as opposed to a TRANSMISSIBLE vaccine, a frequent question.