Does a woman need romance?
๐งต
๐งต
Before we go into discussion in the topic. Let us define romance. Romance is to inspire a deep feeling in a woman in the form of "Love" or high emotion which pulls her into sexual orbit. That is why we separate a romantic relationship from friendships. Sex and high emotion.
Many men will think that my message of frame is too rigid, and that softness brings greater benefit to a relationship with a woman. What benefit? Emotional attachment and sexual arousal. But does a romantic guy inspire those two elements better than a framed man?
Let us break romance into two parts. We either qualify to someone above or inspire qualification to someone below. "Romantic nice guys" get confused with this since they view relationships for women with a false perception of equality. There is no equality. In nature or romance
With that in mind, romance is either an act of supplication to someone above from fear of loss or an act of appreciation to someone below. When a man makes romance a constant, he is in supplication mode and subconsciously triggers a woman to view herself above him
When a man makes romantic gestures/affection a rarity is telling the woman that he is not in fear of her loss but rather is bestowing upon her a rare gift of appreciation. This rarity makes the act seem much larger in her mind and creates greater emotion.
Women encourage men to be romantic guys because it lowers them into a fearful servant mode where they only think of pleasing the elevated woman. A woman encourages men to be of service because having a servant to need is always tempting. To deny this is delusion.
This is one reason that women only encourage men to be romantic which primes them for easy control. Romantic guys are in the feminine frame of authority and are always chasing a woman's qualification which only deflates her arousal/emotion.
Why? Because a woman's sexual arousal comes from male dominance, not male submission. And a man who qualifies to a woman, puts himself into subjection to her. When a man holds frame, puts a woman in qualification mode to him.
Is romance completely wrong? It can do more harm than good but rare romance can heighten feelings like a boss who tells his employee a rare "Good job" -- As opposed to a boss who tells his employee "Good job" every day.
This is why "Romantic guys" who encourage young men to be romantics are betraying the power of their masculine brotherhood. In a way, they are selling their brothers into slavery to women. A great disservice and irresponsible in our fatherless era.
These romantic guys have learned to love their chains and so they encourage other men to love them. Don't listen to these romantic fools. Bear strong frame. Show little emotion. If you want, give a woman rare affection which increases her feelings/arousal. Be wise and stay free.
Enjoy this thread?
Like/Retweet to help struggling men.
Appreciate it.
Like/Retweet to help struggling men.
Appreciate it.
https://twitter.com/jerr_rrej/status/1474424229428932608
Want to learn more about masculine frame?
The Wall Speaks is a book of male empowerment and easy to read guide on learning masculine frame.
Stop the emasculation.
Empower yourself today and grow in dignity.
amazon.com/wall-speaks-Jeโฆ
The Wall Speaks is a book of male empowerment and easy to read guide on learning masculine frame.
Stop the emasculation.
Empower yourself today and grow in dignity.
amazon.com/wall-speaks-Jeโฆ
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ใ
