In my opinion Haridwar’s Conclave only has weakened Hindu Assertion.
I don’t question Intent, given the attack Hindu Community indeed has faced with time but this certainly isn’t the way you win battles.
We must learn from “Gandhi Assassination”.
You can’t be just another Owaisi to fight him.
You can’t threaten certain community only to gain few claps.
Intellectual destruction of Quranic thought is needed. You have no other way out, irrespective of if you like it or not.
The premise is clear. If you think that you can control the menace of Jihad by non-intellectual way, it is a gross mistake.
The brainwashing comes to a level that "Shahadat" is a tenet & they would come forward to fight you out.
Yes there is an argument that those brainwashed minds can't be cleaned again.
God forbid, but if that is the "reality" only disaster awaits.
This is like a Mathematical Equation resulting in exponential curve.
You can't take them head on because they have concept of "linear time" & are away from the idea of "Karma".
For them "Jihad" leads to the "Jannat" which is the end goal. Irrespective of how many Jihadis get "Shahadat", the numbers will keep increasing because of "Mindset".
People would give example of the great Hindu Saviour #GopalPatha.
But what did he do? He led the people to fight Jihadis. Not by organizing events thereby calling for violence followed with claps.
He acted when "needed."
Owaisi(s) have been used to such speeches every now and then.
But how many Hindus organised globally mobilized protest events?
Perhaps had that been routine, we could have saved #kamleshTiwari
The deafness of government would only break if you show your strength of "Satyagrah".
If people would spend time reading the whole thread & sit silently for a while decoding it, they will get:
"I never questioned intent of people at Haridwar Conclave, but called their delivery of speech 'naive.'"
It speaks how far they are from knowing the nature of the beast.
Then I came across this amazing article by @TheJaggi sir, which was shared by @anuraag_saxena bhai. He has so perfectly summed up the nuances.
Read what Clement of Alexandria writes around 200 AD.
He says, “There are those who have determined not only the year of our Lord's birth, but also the day; ...
... & they say that it took place in the 28th year of Augustus, & in the 25th day of (the Egyptian month) Pachon (May 20)... Further, others say that He was born on the 24th or 25th of Pharmuthi (April 20 or 21).”
"I once heard, and I think it is true, that only one man in the world—some Indian mathematician—understood the mathematics of string theory in eleven-dimensional space, and he dreamed it." - Kary Mullis
2/n We are told that Babylonians & Egyptians were the first to deal with "Elements of ancient Geometry."
Then I came across the interesting work of A Seidenberg, called "Ritual origin of Geometry." jstor.org/stable/41133224
He says: Egypt & Babylonia learnt it from Hindus.
3/n While Seidenberg gives very logical case that how it is armature attempt to think that Egyptians & Babylonians learnt elements of Geometry without Sulvasutras, we are also made aware about how the RigVaidik tribes had migrated out to latter influence to the rest of the world.
Dear @Mufti_Yasir īśvára is very much context based.
That is the reason why many see Shiva as īśvára while many see Vishnu as. You perhaps won't even get what the amalgamation of Nirgun & Sagun literally means.
Who is he PM of? He is PM of country that is defined by article-1, "India, that is Bharat".
& what is Bharat? it is the Civilizational State of which Kashi is pivot.
If you question PM @narendramodi taking part in it grandly, you certainly are also mocking the constitution makers who refrained from inserting "Secular"as they thought Bharat's culture has it by default.