Why did @narendramodi not pursue the plastic Gandhis post 2014 win?
I have seen Twitter splitting on this every time a statement comes from the family or any of the others in the opposition including Mamta, OYC.
Here is why they should be left on a long leash.
To understand why Modi Ji said before the win that he will not chase them, you should pay some attention to how our democracy works.
I have said in the past that democracy is inherently flawed, and political system with it's ideological war is dangerous.
In this flawed democratic political system, for a party to survive and grow, it needs what's called an 'enemy'. In politics, this is called 'Opposition'.
Gaining strength against a common enemy is a communist tactic.
BJP is no exception. For it to grow, there must be a villain.
No party will grow just by focusing on service. No party will grow if they did not target an opposition party.
Orissa is an example of how BJP could not target a good Administration.
At the centre, Modi and Shah need Rahul Gandhi to keep attacking them.
In Kerala, @surendranbjp needs Communists to oppose.
In WB, BJP needs TMC to oppose.
A strong target is one who openly displays their true colours, speaks against India, and Hindus. Such targets should float free.
If BJP tried to put them in jail for legitimate reasons, then they will become the heroes and Modi the villain.
Hence their relentless taunting to induce hard action against them.
Followers of BJP may support their leaders in their own state and at the centre by focusing on the 'enemies' and stop accusing BJP for not jailing every good enemy they could focus on.
This is why I said in 2020, that DMK and Communists should come to power in TN and Kerala.
Unfortunately, this is how politics works. Let’s hope by the time of Annamalai, we have a different system.
Until then enjoy the ride. This is something we ordinary folks get out of this game.
Those who instead focus on what Modi Ji should and should not do won't enjoy this.
There are four ways you can do this:
On SM and in the field,
1. Explain and propagate government's good deeds 2. Focus on the opposition or anti-nationals and expose them relentlessly 3. Criticise or expose the government where it goes wrong 4. Participate in nation building.
If you focus ONLY on criticising an otherwise good government, we stand to lose.
In my view, a leader can be tested on these:
~ a good person
~ a patriot
~ works hard to do the right thing always
If you agree @narendramodi is all the above, then I rest my case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The competitive game India has been able to play in recent times gives hope not only to our own future, but also to countries that look upon India as a friend, philosopher and guide.
Keeping our civilisational integrity in the world driven by consumerism; and preserving India’s long legacy of being the Culture Guru of the world is a challenge India can only tide over with careful planning beyond the current geopolitics.
• An inherently proud generation to take on the world.
Age and skills do not bring home the demographic dividends. A national pride is needed.
How India can achieve this in the face of manipulative social engineering is a clear challenge for us.
Making Ajit Doval the National Security Advisor was a much-anticipated move.
However, little did the world expect that a country like India would have the craft and dare to define its own terms while
it’s still a developing country.
Narendra Modi’s new style of leadership powered by Subramaniam Jaishankar’s diplomatic orchestrations and Doval’s formidable combination of master strategy and meticulous footwork enabled India to wield a commanding position in the
emerging multi-polar world.
Modi’s swearing in ceremony asserted India’s lead role in the SAARC countries, but it was the Paris summit on climate change that displayed India’s changing geopolitics in the world arena.
It was obvious from the declaration of ‘climate justice’ by
A world order but in India’s terms: emerging Indian geopolitics - Sreevidya Balasubramaniam
In this thread, I unpack @narendramodi Ji's geopolitics from an outside perspective. To show contrast, I am giving a brief of the past diplomacy as part 1.
India’s past foreign policy
Non-alignment was a foreign policy instrument India followed since her independence.
It sat on a pile of post-war assumptions of the emerging world order. Promoting peace made the core of India’s foreign policy as a pre-condition to development.
However, this policy had long become redundant in the face of a ballooning war economy globally.
Like many domestic policies post-independence, non-alignment was also strongly influenced by the socialist ideas in support of the Soviet Union in the protracted bipolar power-