Stablecoins will become increasingly regulated, only allowed to hold nominally risk-free assets, if they want to connect to regulated, legal institutions.
This includes cash and Treasuries. As such, stablecoins are a way to monetize Treasuries.
In other words, if stablecoins are backed in part by Treasuries, and the stablecoin market cap continues to grow, this is a new source of demand for US government debt.
Cash and Treasuries of various durations get mixed together in a basket, blurring the line between them.
USDC, GUSD, and USDP have already gone this route.
USDT is the one that holds other types of assets as well, which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the US government.
Entities that don't conform to regulations are basically eurodollars- offshore dollars.
Whenever a sovereign government becomes highly indebted in its own currency, financial repression follows.
This means that interest rates on the debt are held below the inflation rate for a long period of time, and institutions are mandated to own the debt.
Stablecoins are used primarily for crypto trading but also somewhat for a medium of exchange.
Some companies like Facebook (via Diem & Novi) are aiming to increase their usage as medium of exchange. We'll see if they are successful.
I do think that custodial stablecoins will increase as a medium of exchange in the 2020s decade. And if so, that means retail investors might increasingly hold both cash and Treasuries, rather than just cash in a bank, all wrapped up together as collateral for the stablecoins.
By increasing the fungibility between cash and Treasuries as collateral for the same asset token, it broadens the type of financial repression that is possible. It's another lever to hold interest rates on government debt well below the inflation rate.
On the institutional side, standing repo facilities increase the fungibility between Treasuries and cash. On the retail and institutional side, regulated stablecoins also increase the fungibility between Treasuries and cash.
I think this is a factor that has macro implications for real rates over the long run, but that few macro investors are paying attention to yet.
For confirmation, we'll need to see the precise details of how US stablecoin regulation shakes out.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People with demanding jobs spend their time in a few key ways:
-Advance at work in the tactical sense.
-Research and have random conversations and insights that boost your tactical work more dramatically.
-Recharge your batteries, refill your spirit, amplify your passion, etc.
All three (and more) are necessary.
Long-term productive people seem to be aware of all three, encourage tactical achievements, but also allow for subjective and longer-term insights, while acknowledging passions and family time.
In other words, work is important, but it has various components (completing TPS reports vs finding new insights), and is recharged by passion (family, hobbies, nature, life, etc).
To dominate at work requires a passion that exists outside of work, for one reason or another.
This chart shows the change in broad money supply per capita compared to the change in beef prices over 5-year rolling periods:
Meanwhile, the past 25 years had a big disconnect between M2 and CPI:
The question, in an imperfect world with imperfect metrics, is M2 or CPI the better metric between the two?
CPI changes its basket of goods and hedonic offsets over the calculation period. Meanwhile, M2 is more consistent but struggles with an opaque financial situation.
A lot of evidence shows that our lifestyles of looking at papers, screens, and phones indoors all day contributes to widespread deterioration in eyesight.
Now imagine if we work from home more, drive less, and wear VR goggles for hours a day...
And then of course we had the inverse correlation between technology and depression. Hunter gathers have rather rough lives but what we think of as depression is nearly nonexistent among them. They have plenty of exercise, decent diet, and frequent flow state.
Modern society requires that we make increasingly conscious choices to go outside, get exercise, and look into the distance, so that we can get the benefits of technology without the physical and mental deterioration that often comes with it.
Blue line is 10-year Treasury yields. Orange line is the annualized inflation-adjusted "real" rate of return if you bought a 10-year Treasury note that year and held it until maturity.
Bonds got killed on a real basis in all three inflationary decades (1910s, 1940s, 1970s).
If you compound -4% annual inflation-adjusted returns over a decade, you lose a third of your purchasing power on consumer goods by the end of the period.
And during that period, you probably lose more than that in terms of your purchasing power of prime capital goods.
So the bond market is "smart money" in that it does a good job of grasping tactical acceleration/deceleration moves, but isn't smart enough to avoid 30-40% losses of purchasing power over the course of a decade on three separate occasions.
All of my equity research over the past 4-5 years can basically summarized with Anakin here.
Most of the other asset classes (besides a few like bitcoin) have been even less attractive than expensive stocks, so the stocks just kept going up. That valuation expansion will end eventually, maybe in 2022 or who knows.
For lack of good money, everyone monetized other assets.
So I've been overweight equities, trying to avoid the silly ones, and letting it all run. Now eventually, everyone will be so piled into equities that it'll stop working. Individual stocks and sectors will become more separated.