Kids return to school in 5 days. If we don’t have #BetterMasks (and more) for all staff and students, schools might technically stay open but with no one to teach or learn. Local and state leaders need to get these masks immediately to distribute staring Monday.
Universal #BetterMasks alone can reduce exposure dramatically relative to universal cloth masks, let alone no masks. They can be more comfortable than cloth, and you could get through the next couple of months for < $20 per person paying retail.
Cost is prohibitive for some families, and many districts couldn’t afford to provide masks for all. Where the gov won’t help, maybe PTOs can step up? Bulk purchase where those who can afford subsidize for those who can’t? State help for low-income districts? Let’s get creative.
For those skeptical that their kids will tolerate #BetterMasks or not sure which are best for a given kid, you could have a central purchase of multiple types with a “mask selection fair” at the school, where kids can try them on. Show videos at assembly on what good fit means.
Obviously ventilation and filtration are also crucial, though less can be done in the next few days (but open any windows that can be opened, and run portable HEPA if you have them).
The weak link is lunchtime. Warm weather places should eat outside when physical space allows. Personally I think kids can eat outside even in colder climates except on extreme days - sitting in 40 degree weather for 10 minutes won’t cause them to dissolve.
Many who say it is cruel to have kids eat lunch outside undoubtedly take their kids to football games or New Year’s Eve fireworks when temperatures are low. Yes, I know supervision logistics get complex and many schools don’t have adequate space. And some places are too cold.
But we should do as much as we can wherever we can. And if you can’t do the outdoor lunch layer, add a different layer. Wherever you sit on the political spectrum, we all want schools open and safe. Let’s come together and make that happen.
We don’t need these measures forever. But the next couple of months with #Omicron will be very difficult. Add protection now for our kids and teachers, and to keep working parents able to work. We can dial back later.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Those who focus on “Most kids will be fine if they get #COVID19” are missing the big picture. If we let kids get COVID in the next few weeks (which is a foregone conclusion with #Omicron without multiple layers of protection in schools), we create some major problems… 🧵
2. Kids will infect their families, putting their health at risk and creating the workplace disruptions that seem to be our primary focus right now.
3. Kids will flood the health care system. And it’s not just about hospitals - pediatric practices will be overrun. And that will have a major ripple effect for other kids who need support, including the mental health challenges gripping so many.
1. In the coming weeks, you will be in a room with someone with #COVID19. But that doesn’t mean you will get infected. The dose makes the poison, so your goal is to reduce your dose as much as possible.
How do you do that? TL;DR - #BetterMasks, ventilation, and filtration 🧵
2. First the basics - Watanabe et al. 2010 published a dose-response model for SARS-CoV, which has been used as the conceptual foundation for SARS-CoV-2 risk modeling. You want to get yourself as far to the left as possible.
3. The question is, how much dose reduction is possible using simpler measures under your control?
Important to remember that measures are cumulative and multiplicative. So stack a few up and you can make a big difference.
1. For your holiday reading pleasure, a special section was just published @AMJPublicHealth on "New Frontiers in Environmental Justice". I was privileged to co-edit it with @DrDianaHernandz. This is a very important topic at a very important time. So what's in the issue? 🧵
2. First, @DrDianaHernandz and I provide a roadmap for the articles, emphasizing how much has changed since a similar special section a decade earlier. This includes escalating burden of climate change, structural racism, and political extremism.
3. An article by Goldsmith and @MichelleScience describes pathways that contribute to disproportionate environmental burdens on the LGTBQ+ population, a population often ignored in environmental justice work.
Look at the #COVID19 wastewater signal for Greater Boston, which tells us where cases are heading next week. It has NEVER been this high, even at last winter's peak. And vax rates in MA are generally higher in Greater Boston. And this is likely before #Omicron. Action now #mapoli
We have a choice: 1) Indoor mask mandate, all-out effort for boosters and vaccinations in vulnerable communities, expansion of testing 2) Do nothing, and watch as health care system is overloaded and families are devastated before the holidays
And for those who argue cases don't matter any more, only hospitalizations and deaths - hospitalizations are at highest level since February, and today was the first day with 50+ deaths reported since March. So we are decidedly not "decoupled".
1. Hi! Trained risk assessor here. Can we talk about this “1 in 5000” risk of getting #COVID19 if you are vaccinated, all of the things that are wrong with the number and how it is being used, and why I still think there is some value in the calculation? 🧵
2. First, for those unfamiliar, this first appeared (to my knowledge) in a column by @DLeonhardt in the @nytimes. He estimated a 1 in 5000 risk from stats in a few settings (UT, VA, WA). Let’s assume that his number is right. I still have a few major problems with it.
3. First, it is a daily risk, which is not how we commonly quantify risk. The column did say this directly, so it is not hidden from the reader, but many people dropped that nuance in talking about the number. Probably too much headline reading and not enough article reading.
Anyone patting themselves on the back about how we have handled #COVID19 in MA should periodically look at this chart and the profound racial/ethnic disparities. #mapoli
Our analyses showed that communities with higher % Latinx populations had sustained elevations in case incidence across the first 8 months of the pandemic, even after controlling for other factors.