This is an attempt to explain plurilaterals. It’s in 2 parts:
• General explanation, including political and legal pitfalls
• The plurilaterals, each in a nutshell. There are 17, so I’m afraid it’s long, from e-commerce to environment and trade
7 plurilaterals are currently under discussion in the WTO. Some are proper negotiations. Others are just talk (for now at least). The aim is to modernise the @wto.
1 is procedural: on appealing dispute rulings while the Appellate Body cannot function
The legal and political pitfalls are about whether the plurilaterals discriminate against non-participating WTO members, how that is inserted into the WTO rule-book, and whether dissenting countries can block making the results legal. It’s complicated
There was so much members disagreed about, most of it with little sign of compromise. They couldn’t even agree on what to call the statement to be issued at the end of the Ministerial Conference #MC12
In principle, those commitments would comply with WTO non-discrimination rules (“most-favoured nation”), meaning they would apply to service suppliers from all WTO members, including free-riding non-participants.
Members’ individual commitments are drafted according to a “reference paper” released yesterday.
That reference paper will probably not be legally binding (wait for tomorrow’s announcement), but the “schedules” of commitments will be, when certified
Confirmed, it's an urgent informal meeting of the WTO General Council at 9.30 (in about 14 minutes) to discuss the deteriorating health situation, travel restrctions and possible alternative arrangements for the Ministerial Conference
1. The two strands of WTO work on trade and the pandemic are not mutually exclusive. The letter says ditch one in favour of the other. That’s not what most developing countries want