NEW—document in the talks among 67 WTO members (EU=28) on streamlining domestic regulation of services.

This lists the countries that have submitted their “schedules” (lists) of commitments. Includes all the major traders = a “critical mass”

1/5 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S… ImageImageImage
In principle, those commitments would comply with WTO non-discrimination rules (“most-favoured nation”), meaning they would apply to service suppliers from all WTO members, including free-riding non-participants.

We have to see the details to confirm

2/5 docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S… ImageImageImage
Members’ individual commitments are drafted according to a “reference paper” released yesterday.

That reference paper will probably not be legally binding (wait for tomorrow’s announcement), but the “schedules” of commitments will be, when certified

3/5
WTO agreements have 2 parts: general “rules” + members’ specific commitments (“schedules”), attached to the rules.

WTO members already have commitments attached to the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). These new commitments would be added to the existing ones.

4/5 Image
Participants in this deal on domestic services regulation were ready to announce it at the now-postponed WTO Ministerial Conference.

They have decided to go ahead anyway.

Follow WTO news: wto.org/english/news_e…

Latest: wto.org/english/news_e…

5/5
So, it’s done, and they didn’t even need to do it at a WTO ministerial conference

(Is it 67 or 68 members? Depends on how you count the EU. EU+27 member states = 28 WTO members. But for obscure legal reasons, the EU wants to be counted as 27.)

What does it all mean?

Here's the WTO's material wto.org/english/news_e…

But by for the best source is @GTP_Trade's website on WTO plurilateral agreements:

wtoplurilaterals.info/plural_initiat…
By the way, here's the updated list, with El Salvador added

docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/S… ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Ungphakorn

Peter Ungphakorn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CoppetainPU

26 Nov
Confirmed, it's an urgent informal meeting of the WTO General Council at 9.30 (in about 14 minutes) to discuss the deteriorating health situation, travel restrctions and possible alternative arrangements for the Ministerial Conference
The official Swiss announcement is now available in French, German, Italian but not yet English. Buttons to switch language at the top right

bag.admin.ch/bag/fr/home/da…
Bloomberg is reporting that the in-person Ministerial Conference is postponed. I'm waiting for confirmation
Read 4 tweets
24 Nov
THIS SUNDAY—ANOTHER 🇨🇭 vote

4th of the year. 3 issues:

1. Covid-19 law (referendum)
2. Better pay and conditions for nurses (initiative)
3. Federal judges to be chosen by drawing lots (initiative)

The Swiss broadcaster’s final opinion poll is out

1/8 swissinfo.ch/eng/covid-cert…
1. The vote on the Covid law is a proper 🇨🇭 #referendum (law or constitutional change referred to a public vote)

This is the 2nd vote on the law. The first was in June

It’s about a range of powers but the Covid certificate is the focus of attention

2/8 swissinfo.ch/eng/fate-of-co…
What is a 🇨🇭 referendum?

A nationwide vote called to challenge legislation already approved by parliament:

• if 50,000 signatures collected within 100-day deadline
• mandatory for constitutional amendments or major international agreements.

3/8 swissinfo.ch/eng/direct-dem…
Read 8 tweets
23 Nov
I sat on this for a day before publishing.

The letter from 86 NGOs misrepresents what’s happening in the WTO so badly that perhaps it’s better to just ignore it.

But it is sponsored by some big names (@amnesty, @Oxfam) and is attracting attention.

1/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…
What did the letter get wrong?

Apart from the absurd hyperbole:

1. The two strands of WTO work on trade and the pandemic are not mutually exclusive. The letter says ditch one in favour of the other. That’s not what most developing countries want

2/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…
2. Those 2 strands (compiling views on trade issues; waiving intellectual property rules) are not equivalent

One is about compiling views (easier). The other is rule-making, affecting legal rights and obligations (much more difficult)

3/5 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/11/23/ngo…
Read 5 tweets
21 Nov
We can tell the tension's rising when weird stories like this appear

Fact: 🇳🇿 Amb David Walker has been working on trade and COVID-19 issues but *not* on the #TRIPSwaiver

Why? Because that is done in the TRIPS Council by chair 🇳🇴 Amb Dagfinn Sørli

1/3 thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/…
This ⬇️ is the latest on the intellectual property (TRIPS) waiver in the TRIPS Council

WTO members are deadlocked on the waiver. No consensus in sight

So the question is: if agreement on this is not possible, should all other work be blocked too?

2/3 wto.org/english/news_e…
More specifically should all other WTO work on COVID-19 and trade, for the Ministerial Conference, be blocked?

The latest from the General Council on these issues: wto.org/english/news_e…

The decision to set up the Walker discussions: wto.org/english/news_e…

3/3
Read 4 tweets
19 Nov
WTO AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS

A bit behind on this one. But despite lots of meetings nothing much seems to have changed.

Info from trade sources:

Chair @GloriaAbrahamP told ambassadors on Monday she will circulate a revised draft (first: July 29)

1/8 tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2021/07/30/agr…
She said huge gaps remain on several issues:

1. Trade-distorting domestic support—go for a numerical target or try to agree on words; a timetable for reducing the support; special treatment for developing countries.

Forget market access.

Draft: tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2-domestic-sup…

2/8
2. Improving information shared among the membership (notifications)—eg, on shipments en route; notifying export restrictions in advance.

This is seen as something that could be delivered at the Ministerial Conference, but differences remain.

Draft: tradebetablog.wordpress.com/9-transparency…

3/8
Read 8 tweets
16 Nov
Oh dear. Trade geekery needs an upgrade 😉

A whopping 86% of you GOT THIS WRONG!

The correct answer is … 154

That’s all 164 @wto members EXCEPT the 10 that have not ratified the agreement.

Why? Does it matter?

Maybe.

Cc: @craigaatkinson @maheenhassan3 @AllieRenison

1/11
The #TradeFacilitationAgreement is multilateral, the whole WTO membership (164) agreeing by consensus.

But to add it in the WTO’s rule book, WTO members had to insert it in the package of agreements—by amending Annex 1 of the WTO Agreement.

2/11 wto.org/english/docs_e…
So rules on amendments apply—WTO Agreement, Art.10, Par.3:

“Amendments … shall take effect for the Members that have accepted them upon acceptance by two thirds of the Members and thereafter for each other Member upon acceptance by it.”

3/11 wto.org/english/docs_e…
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(