A CWRU School of Medicine study of 577,938 pediatric and adult patients shows first time SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring at a time when Omicron was rapidly spreading were associated with significantly less severe outcomes than first time infections when Delta predominated. 🧵
It is IMPORTANT to note severity of disease in humans is NOT determined only by virus replication but also by the host immune response to the infection. Make sure you are PROTECTED. Source for the information above can be found here: medrxiv.org/content/10.110… PLEASE NOTE.
Currently, data on the severity of the disease caused by the Omicron variant compared with the Delta variant has been limited. Here, researchers compared 3-day risks of emergency department (ED) visit, hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, & mechanical ventilation
in patients who were first infected during a time period when Omicron was emerging to those in patients who were first infected when Delta was predominant.
Researchers used electronic health record (EHR) data of 577,938 first-time SARS-CoV-2 infected patients from a multicenter, nationwide database in the U.S. during 9/1/2021-12/24/2021, including 14,054 who had their first infection during the 12/15/2021-12/24/2021 period when
Omicron emerged (Emergent Omicron Cohort) and 563,884 who had their first infection during the 9/1/2021-12/15/2021 period when the Delta variant was predominant (Delta Cohort).
After propensity-score matching the cohorts, the 3-day risks of four outcomes (ED visit, hospitalization, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation) were compared. Risk ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
Of 14,054 patients in the Emergent Omicron cohort (average age, 36.4 ± 24.3 years), 27.7% were pediatric patients (<18 years old). The Emergent Omicron cohort differed significantly from the Delta cohort in demographics, comorbidities, and socio-economic determinants of health.
After propensity-score matching for demographics, socio-economic determinants of health, comorbidities, medications and vaccination status, the 3-day risks in the Emergent Omicron cohort outcomes were consistently LESS THAN HALF those in the Delta cohort.
ED visit: 4.55% vs. 15.22% (risk ratio or RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.28-0.33); hospitalization: 1.75% vs. 3.95% (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.38-0.52]); ICU admission: 0.26% vs. 0.78% (RR: 0.33, 95% CI:0.23-0.48); mechanical ventilation: 0.07% vs. 0.43% (RR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.08-0.32).
In children under 5 years old, the overall risks of ED visits and hospitalization in the Emergent Omicron cohort were 3.89% and 0.96% respectively, significantly lower than 21.01% and 2.65% in the matched Delta cohort (RR for ED visit: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.14-0.25; RR for
hospitalization: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.19-0.68). Similar trends were observed for other pediatric age groups (5-11, 12-17 years), adults (18-64 years) and older adults (≥ 65 years).
Conclusion: First time SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring at a time when the Omicron variant was rapidly spreading were associated with significantly less severe outcomes and significantly milder disease than first-time infections when the Delta variant predominated.
Our findings of reduced hospitalization in the Emergent Omicron cohort compared to the Delta cohort is consistent with findings from Africa, Scotland, and England, that were based on genomic sequences, and goes further to indicate that the severity in hospitalization is reduced.
I recommend reading this thread in full as it looks into pediatric admissions, age stratified data, those with comorbidities, those on immunosuppressants, AND finally some data out of the US that falls in line with data out of several other countries.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“In the United States, mortality trends typically trail case trends by about three weeks- which means the Omicron surge, which began more than a month ago, should be visible in the death counts. It isn’t yet.”
Let’s talk about that. 🧵
NOTE: Source for ALL the information above AND in this thread can be found here. I highly recommend David Leonhardt’s “The Morning” Newsletter.
•nytimes.com/2022/01/05/bri…
“The details of the Omicron variant are becoming clearer, and they are encouraging. They’re not entirely encouraging, and I will get into some detail about one of the biggest problems- the stress on hospitals, which are facing huge numbers of moderately ill COVID-19 patients.”
Guys, B.1.640.2 isn’t new. It actually PREDATES Omicron. It's a sub-lineage of B.1.640- which caused some concern back in mid-November but couldn’t even compete with Delta. B.1.640.2 was first sequenced OVER a month ago and was officially recognized as a lineage in December.
As Tom points out, there haven’t been any new sequences uploaded since before Christmas and this variant has had a decent chance to cause issues but never really materialized. It’s been classified as a Variant Under Monitoring by WHO since November. Let’s focus on Omicron.
“Breakthrough” infections DO NOT mean vaccines don’t work. Remember, they are preventives, NOT cures. One can still contract COVID once vaccinated. As long as that vaccine is preventing you from facing severe disease and worse, it IS working and doing what it was designed to do.
The term infection refers to the virus entering and being detectable in your system regardless of whether OR NOT it makes you sick, whereas the term illness refers to the virus entering, being detectable in your system AND making you sick. It it important not to conflate the two.
The first thing to know about the COVID-19 vaccines is that they’re doing exactly what they were designed and authorized to do. Since the vaccines first started their rollout late last year, rates of COVID-19 disease have taken an unprecedented plunge among the immunized.
@_almond_tree May I make a suggestion. This isn’t new. The preprint just got uploaded like two days ago but that’s it. If anyone does a Google search they’ll see this pops up as early as October/November deseret.com/coronavirus/20… and hasn’t done much. Omicron kinda blew this out of the water.
@_almond_tree This has been under monitoring with B.1.640 being first detected in September 2021. ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/va…. I know everyone is looking for the “next big thing” but context is important. The preprint just got uploaded on 12/29 which is why some people think it’s “new.”
@_almond_tree I mean, it didn’t even get to spread far due to Delta. Now with Omicron, if this variant couldn’t stand to Delta it likely wouldn’t be able to against Omicron either. Again, it’s been under monitoring, that’s it.
Encouraging news out of South Africa. Study data has suggested South Africa’s Omicron peak has indeed passed with NO major spike in deaths OR hospitalizations.
The study looked at the rate at which the fourth surge in cases progressed in the South African city of Tshwane, which researchers described as the "global epicentre" of the Omicron wave.
Researchers looked at hospital records from a Tshwane hospital system and compared them to prior surges. Based on their analysis, the omicron wave "spread and declined in the City of Tshwane with unprecedented speed peaking within 4 weeks of its commencement."
Them: Is there any other vaccine in history that required three doses in a year and yet still didn’t prevent transmission of the virus it was meant to protect against?
Me: Your childhood vaccinations would like a word with you.
Before I forget, reminder that your TDap: Tetanus-Diphtheria-Pertussis (every 10 years) are technically a repetitive vaccine series or rather boosters during adulthood. HPV is another vaccine that could fit here as well.
“Even the measles vaccine, which is incredibly effective, fails to protect about 3% of vaccinated individuals who are exposed to the virus. Jonas Salk's polio vaccine-hailed a medical miracle- was 80% to 90% effective at preventing paralysis caused by the polio virus.”