#SupremeCourt to continue hearing plea challenging 27% reservation for OBCs and 10% reservation for EWS in All India Quota (AIQ) for NEET PG Medical courses.
Yesterday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had submitted that, "Let us go ahead with the counseling, then we can decide. The Court can then hear the matter and we'll continue."
Datar submitted that they formed a committee in 2006 which gave a report in 2010, after extensive deliberations of income criteria, it was attached to the counter of the government, they have gone state wise...the BPL for the urban area was 559/ person per month.
The Committee, they reffered to various criteria to determine poverty, Datar added.
The family should be a unit of identification of poverty, they said don't adopt creamy layer criteria, Datar added.
Datar: When there is an existing committee, which gone into it extensively for 5 years, there must be some reason to defer. What is the reason for taking decision other than Sinho commission. Here is an exhaustive exercise done.
Datar: It is best to take a fixed income, all the BPL get some that's already known... I'll come to 5 acres land criteria, To keep a national thing of 5 acres across the country in arbitrary, in Kerala it's virtually impossible.
Datar says "My submission is Let's not change the rule of the game, let's stick to the criteria that was there is in the prospectus, if your Lordships upholds this they will implement it elsewhere without any study whatsoever."
Chaudhary- the second submission is that Justice Rohini commission was setup to examine sub categorisation to examine, castes are divided into 4 categories, this will have casts distribution reservation at 2%, 6%, 9% and 10% from a total of 27%.
Senior Advocate Anand Grover- Under Article 16, apart from the family income, other incomes are not taken into account. EWS should be perceived in level to present economic situation.
Adv Archana Pathak Dave: I have filed an intervention on behalf of Resident Doctors Federation, we are the one who went on #Strike
45 thousand doctors were inducted,
My submission is that the Counseling has to start at the earliest, we have very low workforce.
Mehta- I'll paraphrase my points and then elaborate.
- I would dispell the confusion, we are not changing any rules midway, we are not changing the goal post.
- Regime that is the subject matter is already implemented except for the UG and PG since 2019.
- Submission that this is unconstitutional is wrong.
- The report of the committee headed by Mr Pandey, eventually, no person with common sense would never reach the conclusion made in the report.
Mehta- If I appear in examination my performance should be the best, it's not that if I'm getting 10% reservation then my performance may be slightly less.
Mehta: All the IITs, NITs and IIITs are all central Universities and have implemented this 27% OBC and 10% EWS because i.e the decision taken as back as in 2019.
Mehta: All UPSC examinations are taking place with this 27% OBC and 10% EWS, MDS counselling was also as per this, Mehta added.
Don't take my argument that as if these are done and hence it should not be considered. #NEETPG #neetpg2021counselling #NEETPG2021
I never argue on jurisdiction, this Court is the highest court in the world, Mehta added.
Court to continue hearing the matter after lunch at 1:30 PM.
Mehta- The Government took a decision that let us increase the number of seats in all colleges. So, the increase in number of seats will not harm the general category students and it was increased to accommodate the EWS. #NEETPG #neetpg2021counselling #NEETPG2021
Mehta- OBC reservation is constitutionally permitted, he further submits that None of the judgment of your Lordships even remotely suggests that there cannot be any reservation in PG.
Mehta: Milords it was argued that there was no study conducted before the committee, but I want to inform as officer of the court that there was an study. There are pleadings showing...
Mehta: Mr Natraj will seek instructions on that and I'll tell at the end.
We understand the statistics,
It is my personal view that, your Lord
I remember a quote "Data is used in the same way as a drunken man uses a lamp post for support rather than illumination."
Mehta further submits that, there may always be a wider mind who can bring an alternative view, I can find out points that they would have gone in, but that is not the magnitude.
Mehta: One of the question that was very rightly bothering your Lordships is that both EWS and creamy layer can have same limit, they have answered it saying that it shall not be clubbed.
Justice Chandrachud- When you first set the limit, you followed the Creamy layer, then you decided to revisit.
Today's income tax exemption limit, upto 5 Lakhs effectively you can say that there is no tax, that is the area where we would like you to take us.
Mehta: There has been no attempt to justify, Mehta referring to the report Submits, the income is family income, if there are 3 members earning 25000, they'll cross that limit, this would be more severe if 5 Lakhs is the limit, they don't want over inclusion also.
Justice Chandrachud- One other thing we want to ask you, the Pandey Committee the 3 norms the area of the flat, municipality, they say it would be impossible that be done away with next year, why don't you do away with it this year.?
Sr ADV Shyam Divan: I would be given some time for the rejoinder after this is over.
Justice Chandrachud- Certainly.
ASG KM Nataraj: Only a few points, one case came before this Court in 1986, the reservation could be provided it was said.
Nataraj- The scheme was proposed before the court of providing All India Quota, the Court allowed, hence the argument that the court made the reservation and the court has the only right is not right.
Wilson: For central quota it has been implemented in 2008, they challenged the 2021 notification, you cannot be choosy. This is selective challenge to reservation.
Wilson: The approval was given by the Court for AIQ, we approached HC seeking 27% quota. Finality has been reached, the entire motive of reopening the whole thing cannot be done.
Advocate A Mariarputham appearing for State of Tamil Nadu submits most of my arguments are covered by Mr Wilson, what I want to add is that the constitution bench had upheld article 15 and 2006 reservation in favour of OBC.
Justice Chandrachud- We are wrapping up today, we cannot keep it up for tomorrow.
Adv VK Biju: everybody were attacking from the other side against EWS, I'll submit that what was the submissions in Constituent assembly. #NEETPG #neetpg2021counselling #NEETPG2021
Biju- This is a revolutionary decision taken by the Government let it continue.
Justice Chandrachud- Now you give us a note, don't tell me you are EWS in the Court, in Court everybody is equal.
Adv Shashank Ratnoo- In the case of OBC salary and agriculture is not counted, and in EWS everything is considered. This is the point I wanted to make.
Justice Chandrachud- Mr Datar and Mr Divan now you have 2 Minutes.
Divan: At this juncture person who registered know that what seats slot they are supposed to compete, you can't change once the registrations are over in such competitive exams.
Divan: Now in the context what does Pradeep Jain do, something from the constitutional perspective, there are certain rights that are written down, there is a second set of right which has been derived by the Court. This is what we are concerned with here.
Divan: The Vishakha right, it's not which is already there, it is created, that is why over all AIQ 50% it was evolved in the context of domiciliary and requirement.
Divan: It is a court created entitlement, we are not saying that you do not have authority, but in this case the Court created it in this situation did you have the right to make chage through an executive order.
Divan: This is putting me on a disadvantage. When you see Abhay Nath, they issued public notice also, their understanding was very different than of what the officers of the Court interpreted. There understanding then was also that it is court created.
Delhi High Court is hearing a plea by Sathish Babu Sana, linked to meat exporter Moin Qureshi's corruption and illegal gratification case. Sana was granted interim protection in the case previously by the Court.
Sana challenges a Look Out Circular issued against him.
Sana: I'm a person who has gone abroad 19 times and returned to the country since registration of the case. I've always presented myself whenever called for investigation.
Founder and Editor of The New Indian has moved the Delhi High Court against @Twitter for blocking access to her handle @AartiTikoo allegedly "for calling out the actions of Kashmiri Islamists on Twitter for threatening her cousin."
The contents of her tweet according to her plea, were: "My brother @TikooSahil who lives in Srinagar, being openly threatened by jihadi terrorists sitting in Kashmir-India, their handlers in Pakistan, UK, US. Is anyone watching?"
(contd.)
"Are we sitting ducks waiting to be shot dead by Islamists or will you crackdown on them? @HMOIndia"
Maninder Singh, Sr.ADV: I have 2 submissions. It is not merely a law and order problem. It is squarely falling in the Special Protection Group Act #PMOIndia . Section 14 says “assistance to the group shall be the duty of every ministry of central or State Government”
Singh: This fell for your lordships consideration with regard to a former PM who was under trial for corruption and the place of the trial had to be shifted. Even if the PM wants to wave the protection, he cannot do that. He does not have the right #PMOIndia
Justice Chandrachud dictating order- There is a challenge in the petition to the notification issued by the Director General of Health Services.
The notice takes effect from 2021-2022.