Good #BLS#NFP Jobs Day.
Below are my pre-report observations on what to look for.
Stay tuned for quick analysis and, thereafter, the @jobqualityindex data related to today's report.
Non-farms payrolls up 199,000
Private sector up 211,000 (loss of government workers)
Unemployment rate falls to 3.9% as labor force increases by only 168,000. LFPR flat at 61.9.
Stay tuned for additional analysis, but this is miserable data.
Upward revisions for two prior months totaled 141,000. Not bad, but nowhere near enough to offset the bad news today.
Leisure and hospitality hiring DID stall in December, up only 41,000 vs. 211,000 in November. Retail jobs fell (at Christmas!) by 13,300 (perhaps seasonal adj?)
M/M hourly wages grew at an eye-watering 0.6%, while hours remained flat. But the growth was concentrated in hard to fill services jobs (spilling over from low paying into professionals as well) - Manufacturing and Construction did not benefit as much.
This is also the second month of EXTREME divergence between the household survey and the establishment survey in terms of the number of jobs added.
December:
Household 651,000
Establishment 199,000
November:
Household 1,090,000
Establishment 249,000
This is abnormal.
As it did last month, the @jobqualityindex JQInstant measure of all jobs created in December shows that most were in high-quality sectors paying more than the average weekly income for all jobs (unsurprising given the collapse in L&H and retail hiring, etc.):
The one month lagging @jobqualityindex for Nov-2021 came in at 81.17 (3 month trailing average). This value represents a 0.08% change from the prior month, Oct-2021 and is indicative of the same shift of employment to higher paying positions. (see prior tweet).
This report truly complicates the policy picture.
On the one hand, we have a buffer stock of labor that has still not returned to work.
Then we have Omicron, which may further delay that process.
The Fed is tightening monetary policy.
And no more fiscal relief on the horizon.>>
Add in the relief of supply pressures (almost all of the bottlenecks will be history by the end of Q1) and attendant disinflationary imports, and I am much more concerned now with a more sudden demand side collapse than I previously was.
Hourly wage growth not sustainable then.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The complex dynamics of today's Employment Situation Report: 1) We are still in a "re-hiring" phase, not a jobs creation phase (the jobs have been out there for months). So the key data point will be labor force participation. If the jobs number is strong and LFP rises...>>
>>...that will likely mean the return of workers previously sitting on accumulated federal transfers needing to become re-employed, the unemployment rate remaining stable (or even rising) and wage pressures decreasing this year. 2) Probably too early for the December data...>>
>>...as the test week ended 12/17, but it will be interesting to see if leisure and hospitality were hammered yet - as it and other sectors surely will be in January - due to Omicron. 3) Finally, the adjustments from November's weak date will be interesting to see. Covid...>>
#NFP Expecting a strong number today. The headline will not be impacted by the loss of government education jobs we saw in September and I expect private sector to show far more strength with the ending of supplemented unemployment benefits now fully filtered through the data.
#NFP As a result of the above, I see the number as likely to exceed expectations of 450K to 475K, with a decent shot of well-exceeding that range. But the test week was the week ending October 17th, and activity has increased measurably after that with improving COVID data.
#NonFarmPayrolls come in at 531,000 in October as the Unemployment Rate registers 4.6%. Now let's look at the details underneath the headlines as we await the @jobqualityindex data.
1/10
THREAD: There's No "Great Resignation"
There's this idea that a post-pandemic "labor shortage," yielding wage inflation, is caused by disinterest in work.
A good example of the "paralysis of aggregates" I spoke of in this @Bloomberg podcast this week: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/10
That's an easy snap judgment to arrive at when you correlate the malaise related to these 19 months of plague with the fact that, in the aggregate, millions of workers have, in fact, not yet returned to their jobs:
3/10
But if that is where you stop in your analysis you miss the underlying realities. First of all, we know where the unfilled jobs are - they are disproportionately in the low-wage/low-hours (read "low income") sectors. See the income levels below for guidance and bear with me:
Good Jobs Day everyone. Today we see if the slow pace of reduction in continuing (not initial) extended and supplemented unemployment claims is again reflected in the #BLS data for June. Estimates for job growth of ~600K private and ~700K total sound reasonable, but its dicey.
If we get a big jump in jobs, we should see a slump in wages as most of the jobs seeking worker are low-wage/low-hours jobs. And they are not likely the type to draw in people off the bench from either the unemployed OR those who have left the labor force: nytimes.com/2021/06/01/opi…
#BLS Non-farm payrolls rise by 850,000
The U-3 unemployment rate remains at 5.9%
Good Jobs Day morning! Hopefully we will see a renewed acceleration in the restoration of jobs during May. But after we dissect the data at 8:30am EDT. the remaining question will be which sectors still have not returned to prepandemic employment levels?
Answer: Mostly low income
We know that the re-employment gap is mostly in the low income sectors (below) because there are many workers receiving unemployment benefits exceeding incomes from their old jobs.
What we don't know is whether all their old jobs are really still there! nytimes.com/2021/06/01/opi…
With the above as prologue, stay tuned for the data in 5 minutes....
...and here is a link to the @nytimes piece:
Americans Don’t Want to Return to Low Wage Jobs nyti.ms/2S1Jzbx
Continuing on the U.S. Employment front this morning, we just had a really good number out of #ADP of 978,000 jobs added in May. We'll see tomorrow if that squares with the #BLS numbers and offers a "catch-up" from the disappointing April data. But now, Unemployment Claims...