Good Jobs Day morning! Hopefully we will see a renewed acceleration in the restoration of jobs during May. But after we dissect the data at 8:30am EDT. the remaining question will be which sectors still have not returned to prepandemic employment levels?
Answer: Mostly low income
We know that the re-employment gap is mostly in the low income sectors (below) because there are many workers receiving unemployment benefits exceeding incomes from their old jobs.
What we don't know is whether all their old jobs are really still there!
nytimes.com/2021/06/01/opi…
With the above as prologue, stay tuned for the data in 5 minutes....
#BLS reporting May Non-farm Payrolls increasing by 559,000 and the U-3 unemployment rate falling to 5.8%.
Here come the details and, shortly, the @jobqualityindex and #JQInstant readouts.
NFP was disappointing and further hurt by the downward revision to the very disappointing prior month. There is no question that what I wrote earlier this week is a big factor. The incomes offered are not attracting people off of unemployment benefits:
nytimes.com/2021/06/01/opi…
The telling point is that the projected DECLINE in average hourly earnings did not materialize (it rose 0.5%) because the composition of rehiring not drawing back the low income workers.
The decline in the labor force participation rate by 1/10th of a percent is disappointing too, but I read it as folks falling off extended benefits and not rushing out to look for new jobs right away because what is out there is paying very little. They will eventually need a job
While the traditional low-wage/low-hours sectors pick up jobs - they are nowhere near the volume necessary to restore headcount to pre-pandemic levels. Big concern, however it that retail FELL by 6K. Are the jobs just not out there because so many stores have closed? Very likely.
The rest of the traditional low-wage/low-hours sectors accounted for most of the net job growth:
Leisure and Hospitality: 292K
Healthcare and Social Assistance: 46K
Administration and Waste Services: 18K
Important to note in the above regard that PRIVATE SECTOR payrolls only increased by 492K or the total NFP of 559K - the rest being, of course, government employment. So those three low income sectors were 356K of 492K in private jobs formed in May.
Another disturbing data point is that the labor force itself declined by 53K. Very unusual during a "booming recovery" (scare quotes intended). Jobs on offer are not drawing in even those workers who have timed out of their unemployment benefits or just stopped looking.
And here's the @jobqualityindex's #JQInstant graph showing that 82.52% of the private sector jobs formed in May were in Low-wage/Low-hours sectors. Not unexpected as a percentage, but as discussed above, not enough takers of these low income jobs (or too many lost businesses?).
And this data tells the a big story:
Leisure and hospitality hourly wages rise a huge 1.2% M/M but hours worked FALL to 25.1 from 25.3. Pretty odd for employers complaining about no available workers. So weekly incomes rise from a pathetic $396.70 to a nearly unchanged $398.34!
And now we have the @jobqualityindex through April (runs with a 1 month lag) which fell -0.42% to 81.49. The index should continue to fall (albeit SLOWLY given today's data) as low income jobs eventually return to the mix. (Click to open the graph to see recent data)
This month's full @jobqualityindex report - with updates to today's Employment Situation Data - is now out, here:
bit.ly/JQIMay2021

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Alpert

Dan Alpert Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanielAlpert

3 Jun
On @NPR @MorningEdition this morning with @NPRinskeep chatting about unemployment and my @nytopinion essay from yesterday...
npr.org/2021/06/03/100…
...and here is a link to the @nytimes piece:
Americans Don’t Want to Return to Low Wage Jobs nyti.ms/2S1Jzbx
Continuing on the U.S. Employment front this morning, we just had a really good number out of #ADP of 978,000 jobs added in May. We'll see tomorrow if that squares with the #BLS numbers and offers a "catch-up" from the disappointing April data. But now, Unemployment Claims...
Read 8 tweets
19 Oct 20
IMPORTANT THREAD RE: CHINA 1/n
Back in March, near the beginning of the US lockdown, I warned those predicting a US economic "supply shock," stemming the fall in exports by China not to count China out. That China would battle back with a vengeance,...
2/n
...using every tool at its disposal, including currency devaluation, industrial subsidies and household support - in addition to its overwhelming attack on #COVID19. I said then that China would be playing an aggressive game of economic "catch-up. >>
3/n
And China has done exactly that, with astounding success in terms of restoring growth to its economy:

"With Covid-19 Under Control, China’s Economy Surges Ahead" reported by @KeithBradsher
>>
nyti.ms/2T8bkMG
Read 14 tweets
13 Sep 20
1/5
Thank you, @andrewrsorkin, for compiling these - largely, appropriately critical - essays on Milton Friedman's work of a half century ago. But one critical argument is absent: The change in composition of share ownership over the past 50 years.>> nyti.ms/2GRaXTK
2/5
As Hyman Minsky wrote sometime after Friedman's disturbing exegesis on corporate capitalism, even by the 1970s - larger by magnitudes since - the shareholders for whom profits are being generated have become isolated from corporate governance/oversight by "money managers.">>
3/5
This "money manager capitalism" is not really focused on profits, but on values reflected in stock prices. Regardless of profitability, manager-intermediaries seek, at all costs, price gains that place them in a competitive, or at least equal, position with other managers.>>
Read 5 tweets
3 Apr 20
MARCH 12th - keep that date in mind this morning. We will have lots to talk about regarding the #BLS employment situation report at 8:30am EDT. But remember that the test date for "jobs day" data is the 12th of the month being reported. And March 12 was before the lock downs.>>
>>Consequently, today's Non-farm Payroll data won't come anywhere near reflecting the reality of the #COVID19 pandemic impact.
Nevertheless, will be back at 8:30 and expect to see a material, if early, loss of front line low-wage/low-hours - see why, here: jobqualityindex.com
#BLS #NFP Payrolls decline by 701,000 with the unemployment rate at 4.4. This is just the tip of the iceberg as the reference date for the data is the week ending March 13th, before the social and economic lock downs. But really bad.>>
Read 14 tweets
11 Mar 20
If I had a $ for each time I have heard MMT used positively over the past month, I could monetize the debt of an average US household! The markets, CEOs and not just a few pols are cutting from "mainstream" economists. My prediction: An epochal change, the likes of 1932 and 1980.
See, for example, this from today:

Rishi Sunak to signal end of austerity with huge leap in borrowing - giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/ac… via @FT
And, you might see my piece from the weekend as to why this is happening - and should be (in which I never actually refer to MMT - just its essential logic):
businessinsider.com/coronavirus-bo…
Read 4 tweets
1 Nov 19
#BLS Today's job's report will be the last prior to the launch of the U.S. Private Sector Job Quality Index (JQI) on November 14th, which will thereafter be updated and released on each "jobs day." #JQI is a collaborative of @Cornell, @cpa_tradereform, @UMKC and @GISP_Tweets,>>
>and tracks shifts in job quality related to relative levels of weekly income (wages times hours) on a real time basis from month to month. The JQI reveals is three decades of astonishing job quality decline, reflecting a substantial increase in the number of>>
> production and non-supervisory jobs that are below the mean level weekly incomes of all such jobs. In 1990, 52.7% of those jobs fell below the mean – but since then, 63% of all net new job formation has been lower wage/lower hours. >>
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(