...and here is a link to the @nytimes piece:
Americans Don’t Want to Return to Low Wage Jobs nyti.ms/2S1Jzbx
Continuing on the U.S. Employment front this morning, we just had a really good number out of #ADP of 978,000 jobs added in May. We'll see tomorrow if that squares with the #BLS numbers and offers a "catch-up" from the disappointing April data. But now, Unemployment Claims...
....For the week ended May 29th, Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Benefits fell - very nicely - to 385,000. The lowest level, by far, since the pandemic. And edging back slowly into its normal range of just above 200K...
But the claims themselves are no longer the story>
Continuing claimants remain at 15.4 million workers. And the complexion of those claimants is changing. Conventional (28 week) state and federal benefit recipients are down to 3.5 million. The number on extended (13 week) federal benefits actually rose to 5.3 million week/week>>>
And we still have 6.4 million formerly self-employed workers receiving federally-paid unemployment benefits.
Together, this is nearly $10 billion/week that the federal government is pumping into the economy, likely all of which is being spent by recipients (its ~$750/week total).
So here's the (annualized) $520 billion question: Will there be sufficient jobs to employ (or offer self-employment gigs) to ~13 million workers between now and September 6th when all federal supplements cease? Hard to imagine so, as I covered here: nytimes.com/2021/06/01/opi…
So keep an eye on those continuing claims numbers as we head closer to the federal unemployment benefits cliff. We are likely to have a terrific summer of reopening fun - but the fall may bring negative surprises when it comes to household consumption.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Good Jobs Day morning! Hopefully we will see a renewed acceleration in the restoration of jobs during May. But after we dissect the data at 8:30am EDT. the remaining question will be which sectors still have not returned to prepandemic employment levels?
Answer: Mostly low income
We know that the re-employment gap is mostly in the low income sectors (below) because there are many workers receiving unemployment benefits exceeding incomes from their old jobs.
What we don't know is whether all their old jobs are really still there! nytimes.com/2021/06/01/opi…
With the above as prologue, stay tuned for the data in 5 minutes....
IMPORTANT THREAD RE: CHINA 1/n
Back in March, near the beginning of the US lockdown, I warned those predicting a US economic "supply shock," stemming the fall in exports by China not to count China out. That China would battle back with a vengeance,...
2/n ...using every tool at its disposal, including currency devaluation, industrial subsidies and household support - in addition to its overwhelming attack on #COVID19. I said then that China would be playing an aggressive game of economic "catch-up. >>
1/5 Thank you, @andrewrsorkin, for compiling these - largely, appropriately critical - essays on Milton Friedman's work of a half century ago. But one critical argument is absent: The change in composition of share ownership over the past 50 years.>> nyti.ms/2GRaXTK
2/5 As Hyman Minsky wrote sometime after Friedman's disturbing exegesis on corporate capitalism, even by the 1970s - larger by magnitudes since - the shareholders for whom profits are being generated have become isolated from corporate governance/oversight by "money managers.">>
3/5 This "money manager capitalism" is not really focused on profits, but on values reflected in stock prices. Regardless of profitability, manager-intermediaries seek, at all costs, price gains that place them in a competitive, or at least equal, position with other managers.>>
MARCH 12th - keep that date in mind this morning. We will have lots to talk about regarding the #BLS employment situation report at 8:30am EDT. But remember that the test date for "jobs day" data is the 12th of the month being reported. And March 12 was before the lock downs.>>
>>Consequently, today's Non-farm Payroll data won't come anywhere near reflecting the reality of the #COVID19 pandemic impact.
Nevertheless, will be back at 8:30 and expect to see a material, if early, loss of front line low-wage/low-hours - see why, here: jobqualityindex.com
#BLS#NFP Payrolls decline by 701,000 with the unemployment rate at 4.4. This is just the tip of the iceberg as the reference date for the data is the week ending March 13th, before the social and economic lock downs. But really bad.>>
If I had a $ for each time I have heard MMT used positively over the past month, I could monetize the debt of an average US household! The markets, CEOs and not just a few pols are cutting from "mainstream" economists. My prediction: An epochal change, the likes of 1932 and 1980.
And, you might see my piece from the weekend as to why this is happening - and should be (in which I never actually refer to MMT - just its essential logic): businessinsider.com/coronavirus-bo…
#BLS Today's job's report will be the last prior to the launch of the U.S. Private Sector Job Quality Index (JQI) on November 14th, which will thereafter be updated and released on each "jobs day." #JQI is a collaborative of @Cornell, @cpa_tradereform, @UMKC and @GISP_Tweets,>>
>and tracks shifts in job quality related to relative levels of weekly income (wages times hours) on a real time basis from month to month. The JQI reveals is three decades of astonishing job quality decline, reflecting a substantial increase in the number of>>
> production and non-supervisory jobs that are below the mean level weekly incomes of all such jobs. In 1990, 52.7% of those jobs fell below the mean – but since then, 63% of all net new job formation has been lower wage/lower hours. >>