December payrolls report shows disappointing job growth of only +199k in December, well below expectations.
Unemployment fell a couple of ticks to 3.9%.
And revisions suggest the past couple of months were a bit better than feared.
Revisions punched November's number up from +210k to +249k, and October up from +546k to +648k. Those upward revisions -- and the prospect that December's number is likely to be revised up -- put a somewhat sunnier glow on these disappointing numbers.
Over the past three months payrolls employment has grown, on average, by +365k per month, which is okay, but not the sort of growth you might hope for.
And the past two months are consistent with a real slowdown in the recovery.
Remember, these are all pre-Omicron data.
So the economy didn't hit what I fear is a severe Omicron shock with any momentum. It dawdled into Omicron, and as you can see all around you, that has since caused all sorts of disruption that'll take months to unwind, even when the surge in cases is behind us.
The household survey provides a more upbeat reading, suggesting that employment grew +651k, which is why the unemployment rate fell to a pretty good 3.9%.
There's something pretty interesting going on in the household survey, which suggests that employment grew by 4.3m in the second half of 2021 (a rate of +727k per month). By contrast, payrolls says we added only 3m jobs (a rate of +508k).
FWIW the latter is usually more reliable
Here's the huge caveat: The "reference period" for the household survey was Dec 5-11. The reference payroll period for the payrolls survey is the pay period including Dec 12. Omicron was barely a factor back then.
We're only learning about our pre-Omicron pre-history.
Where's the economy at?
Well, 3.9% unemployment sounds pretty great. That's partly real, and partly because a lotta people have dropped out of the labor force.
Relative to pre-covid trends, we're still missing about 5-1/2 million jobs. That's a big hole.
Or in simpler terms: Employment remains 3-1/2 million below its pre-covid level. Again, a lot. In normal times, losing this many jobs would count as a very serious slump.
Average hourly earnings grew by 0.6% last *month*, which is a pretty rapid clip. It's consistent with wage growth starting to accelerate both ahead of inflation and ahead of the Fed's comfort zone.
Annualized wage growth over the past:
3 months: 6.2%
6 months: 5.8%
Year: 4.7%
An interesting snippet... It's easy to *explain* much of *this month's* divergence between the household and firm surveys: They measure slightly different things. But it's less clear which is a better measure of our macroeconomic health.
Doves: Job growth has slowed for the last 2 months, January's Omicron-inflected report will be awful, and none of us know how well we'll bounce back after that.
Hawks: Wage growth is taking off as it would at the start of a wage-price spiral
It's an environment you wouldn't want to tighten into, and an environment you wouldn't want to ease into, and it's not clear the current settings are the right ones.
Good policy will require a lot of hard thinking about how best to respond to supply shocks. And nerves of steel.
Open thread here. Please respond with links to the tweets about today's jobs report which you think need to get more eyeballs. Love to read the snippets, hot takes and insightful graphs you're seeing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Short version of the prize: We used to dig into the data, say "correlation ain't causation," quickly forget we said that, and make a bunch of causal-ish statements based on data that really couldn't support such claims.
Then David, Josh and Guido said: Hang on.
Their response wasn't the usual destructive "we can't make causal claims" stuff, but rather entirely constructive: Here's a toolkit and set of approaches to help you make credible causal claims.
Non-farm payrolls in September rose by only +194k, after +366k last month.
The recovery has stalled.
We're missing about 8 million jobs, and at this rate, we're not bringing them back any time soon.
Slightly brighter news in the revisions: Last month's gains were revised from +235k to +366k. The previous month's gains were revised up by an additional +38k. So the prior two months were in total +169k better than we thought.
But this month is about 300k worse than we hoped.
The unemployment rate fell from 5.2% to 4.8%, but celebrations on this score would be premature, as it partly reflects the labor force shrinking by about -183k.
Household survey is slightly sunnier than the payrolls survey, showing employment growth of +526k.
Stunning new estimates suggest that the 400 wealthiest American families paid an average Federal tax rate of only 8.2%. whitehouse.gov/cea/blog/2021/…
Here’s why: 1. The rich rely on investment income, which is taxed at lower rates than labor income. 2. They pay no income tax on a big chunk of their investment income. (This is the “stepped up basis” loophole.)
This new estimate does something quite important: It analyzes a measure of income that includes unrealized capital gains. The rich earn a lot of this income, but because it’s difficult to calculate, few estimates of tax rates include it.
The vax mandate solves a collective action problem:
Businesses want to vax their staff to provide a safe workplace. But they’re each worried that if they move first, they’ll lose staff to their rivals (who probably also want vaxxed staff). Mandating the vax solves this problem.
Point is in many industries all of the major players want fully vaccinated staff, but none wants to bear the political heat of announcing this first. Result: None of them require it even if all of ‘em want to.
The mandate solves the problem of waiting for a first mover to emerge
The vax mandate only applies to large employers, and so may be a competitive advantage for large companies, because customers know they’ll be safe there. Small businesses who do have vaccinated staff need a way to signal that they’re just as safe.
Viewing Biden's vaccine mandate as simply economic policy, it's surely the cheapest and most powerful economic stimulus ever enacted.
Lemme explain: Covid is a tax -- a tax on all in-person interactions, paid not with dollars but with lives. Vaccinations are a tax cut, and your shot cuts both your your covid tax, and your neighbors taxes, too. More jabs = a bigger tax cut, which will boost the service sector.
The reason that cutting the covid tax is such a cheap stimulus, is that this is one of the few tax cuts that doesn't actually reduce government revenue. Indeed, it probably boosts revenue: People are more likely to work when they feel safe, which boosts the government coffers.